AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Intel Core i7-13650HX Comparison

The benchmark database places the Intel Core i7-13650HX and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS in the same performance tier, with both processors holding an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs. However, the recorded head-to-head results are decisively one-sided. Across fifteen shared benchmark tests, the Intel part wins every single matchup, often by substantial margins. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, while a capable mobile processor in its own right, is clearly outclassed in the measured workloads. This analysis breaks down those results, examines where each chip excels, and provides a data-driven verdict for prospective buyers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic separation occurs in the Cinebench suite, which stresses both single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 24,580 compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS’s 11,992, a lead of 105 percent. That is a doubling of performance, and it reflects the Intel chip’s higher core count and thread count. The single-core test in Cinebench R23 shows an even larger percentage gap: Intel scores 3,470 while AMD manages 1,455, a delta of 138.5 percent. These are extreme differences, indicating that the Intel architecture has a significant advantage in both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads.

The older Cinebench R15 tests show similar trends, though with smaller gaps. In R15 multi-core, Intel scores 2,477 versus AMD’s 1,987, a 24.7 percent win. In R15 single-core, Intel’s 349 beats AMD’s 234 by 49.1 percent. The compression of these percentages compared to R23 suggests that the newer test scales more aggressively with the Intel chip’s additional cores and higher boost clocks.

PassMark results confirm the pattern, though the margins vary by workload. The largest PassMark win for Intel is in floating-point math, where the Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 75,643 against AMD’s 47,533, a 59.1 percent advantage. Physics simulation shows a 72.9 percent lead for Intel, with scores of 1,745 versus 1,009. Prime number finding, a test that often rewards raw integer throughput, gives Intel 103 against AMD’s 56, an 83.9 percent edge.

Other PassMark tests are closer but still favor Intel. Integer math sees Intel at 102,929 versus AMD’s 84,228, a 22.2 percent lead. Data compression gives Intel 383,943 versus 292,698, a 31.2 percent margin. Data encryption is tighter, with Intel at 21,649 and AMD at 18,104, a 19.6 percent difference. Extended instructions, which test SIMD and other specialized operations, show Intel ahead by 15.1 percent, scoring 23,146 versus 20,114.

Random string sorting, a test of memory access patterns and cache efficiency, favors Intel by 36 percent, with scores of 41,162 and 30,266. The multithreaded PassMark score, which aggregates several workloads, gives Intel 30,704 against AMD’s 22,801, a 34.7 percent win. Single-threaded PassMark results are the closest overall, with Intel at 3,769 and AMD at 3,184, a still significant 18.4 percent gap. The Intel chip wins all fifteen head-to-head tests, with zero victories for the AMD part.

Where Each One Wins

Given the data, there is no benchmark category where the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS takes the lead. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is superior in every measured workload. That said, the magnitude of the Intel advantage varies, which suggests different use cases are affected differently.

For multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, or any workload that scales across cores, the Intel chip is the clear choice. The 105 percent lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the strongest argument here. Tasks that saturate all cores will finish in roughly half the time on the Intel part, assuming the same thermal and power conditions. The 24.7 percent lead in R15 multi-core, while smaller, still indicates a substantial throughput advantage.

For single-threaded tasks, such as older games or lightly threaded applications, the Intel chip also wins. The 138.5 percent lead in Cinebench R23 single-core is the largest single-threaded gap in the entire comparison. This suggests a major architectural advantage in per-core performance, not just a core count benefit. The 49.1 percent lead in R15 single-core reinforces this, though the R23 result is more telling for modern software.

The PassMark data reveals where the gap is smallest. Data encryption, extended instructions, and single-threaded PassMark all show Intel leads under 20 percent. For tasks that rely heavily on these specific instruction patterns, the difference is less punishing. However, the AMD chip still loses, so it is not a matter of AMD winning these categories, only that the Intel advantage is narrower.

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS’s strengths, based on the available data, lie in its efficiency rather than raw performance. It has a 35 watt TDP compared to Intel’s 55 watts, which suggests lower power consumption and heat generation. The database does not record battery life or thermals, but the TDP difference is the only metric where AMD comes out ahead. For users who prioritize portability and battery longevity over maximum performance, the AMD chip is the more sensible choice, even though it loses every benchmark.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is the faster processor in every recorded test. Its 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 4.90 GHz boost clock, deliver results that the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS cannot match. The AMD chip’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a 4.70 GHz boost clock, are simply outmatched by the Intel part’s higher core count and superior per-core performance.

For users who need maximum processing power for demanding tasks, the Intel Core i7-13650HX is the only choice based on these measurements. The 105 percent lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core alone justifies its selection for rendering, video editing, or scientific computing. The 138.5 percent lead in single-core performance also makes it the better option for games or applications that rely on one or two fast threads.

For users who prioritize battery life and lower heat output, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS has a compelling case, even though it loses every benchmark. Its 35 watt TDP is significantly lower than the Intel chip’s 55 watts. This likely translates to longer unplugged operation and quieter cooling in thin laptops. The performance gap is real, but it is acceptable for lighter workloads like office productivity, web browsing, or media consumption.

The average benchmark scores place the Intel chip at 33,089 and the AMD chip at 32,354, a difference of only 2.2 percent. This aggregate figure is misleading, however, because the head-to-head tests show much larger gaps. The average includes benchmark results that are not directly comparable, such as Geekbench scores for AMD and 3DMark scores for Intel. The head-to-head results are the more reliable indicator of actual performance differences.

In summary, the Intel Core i7-13650HX is the superior performer in all measured aspects. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is a viable alternative only when power efficiency is the primary concern. The verdict is straightforward: choose the Intel part for performance, choose the AMD part for efficiency.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Intel Core i7-13650HX in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel chip scores 24,580 versus AMD’s 11,992, a 105 percent lead. This means the Intel processor completes the render in roughly half the time.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS win any benchmark against the Intel chip?

A: No. Across all fifteen shared head-to-head tests, the Intel Core i7-13650HX wins every single one. The AMD chip records zero victories.

Q: What is the biggest single-threaded performance gap?

A: The largest single-threaded difference is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel scores 3,470 and AMD scores 1,455, a 138.5 percent delta. This is also the largest gap in any test.

Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of power consumption?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i7-13650HX has a TDP of 55 watts. This is the only metric where AMD has an advantage.

Q: Are there any workloads where the AMD chip is close to the Intel chip?

A: The smallest Intel lead is 15.1 percent in PassMark extended instructions. Data encryption shows a 19.6 percent gap, and single-threaded PassMark shows an 18.4 percent gap. These are the closest results, but Intel still wins.

Q: What do the average benchmark scores say about these two chips?

A: The Intel chip has an average benchmark score of 33,089, while the AMD chip has 32,354. This 2.2 percent difference is much smaller than the head-to-head gaps, but it includes different test sets that are not directly comparable.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant, using a 10 nanometer process node. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, which indicates a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS uses AMD’s Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, on a 6 nanometer process node from TSMC. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, a traditional uniform design.

The cache hierarchies differ significantly. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel’s larger L2 and L3 caches likely contribute to its single-threaded performance lead.

Both processors support DDR5 memory, but the Intel chip also supports DDR4. The AMD chip specifies a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel chip does not list a bandwidth figure in the database. The AMD chip has ECC memory disabled, while the Intel chip supports ECC memory. PCIe support differs as well: Intel offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Integrated graphics are a notable difference. The Intel Core i7-13650HX includes UHD Graphics 710, a basic iGPU. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS includes Radeon 680M, which is generally considered a more capable integrated graphics solution, though no benchmark scores for iGPUs are in the database. The AMD chip’s smaller die size (208 mm² versus Intel’s 257 mm²) reflects its more efficient process node.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core i7-13650HX has more cores (14 versus 8) and more threads (20 versus 16). Its base clock is 2.60 GHz, while the AMD chip has a higher base clock of 3.20 GHz. The Intel chip’s boost clock is 4.90 GHz, which is faster than AMD’s 4.70 GHz. This explains the Intel advantage in single-threaded tests.

TDP differs substantially: Intel is rated at 55 watts, AMD at 35 watts. The Intel chip uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, while AMD uses the AMD Socket FP7. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while AMD supports only DDR5. The Intel chip has a higher L3 cache (24 MB versus 16 MB) and a larger die (257 mm² versus 208 mm²). The AMD chip is manufactured on a smaller 6 nm process versus Intel’s 10 nm.

The Intel chip has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the AMD chip is locked. The Intel chip supports ECC memory, while AMD does not. PCIe version differs: Intel Gen 5, AMD Gen 4. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 710 for Intel and Radeon 680M for AMD. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $485, while no MSRP is recorded for the AMD chip. The Intel chip was released on January 3, 2023, while the AMD chip’s release date is not recorded.