AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS and Intel Core i5-14400 occupy different corners of the processor market, yet their benchmark profiles overlap in surprising ways. The data shows a clear overall winner in raw performance, but the AMD mobile chip carves out specific niches where it holds the advantage. This analysis walks through the head-to-head results, the use-case implications, and the architectural and specification differences that explain the outcomes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14400 dominates the benchmark comparison, winning 14 of the 17 recorded tests. The most dramatic separation appears in Cinebench R23, where Intel's multicore score of 21315 crushes AMD's 11992, a 43.7% deficit for the Ryzen 7 6800HS. The single-core gap is even more pronounced in percentage terms: Intel's 3009 versus AMD's 1455 represents a 51.6% lead, the largest delta of any test in the pack. These Cinebench results paint a stark picture of generational and segment differences, with the desktop Intel part delivering more than double the single-threaded rendering performance.

The Geekbench results tell a similar but less extreme story. Intel wins multicore with 9807 against 9515, a modest 3% margin, and single-core with 1905 against 1652, a 13.3% advantage. The multicore gap here is far narrower than in Cinebench, suggesting that Geekbench's workload mix doesn't stress the Intel chip's additional cores as heavily. PassMark's multithread test shows Intel ahead at 25080 versus 22801, a 9.1% margin, while the single-thread test gives Intel a 14.9% lead at 3741 versus 3184.

Looking at specialized workloads, Intel wins passmark_find_prime_numbers with 80 against AMD's 56, a 30% advantage, and passmark_physics with 1396 versus 1009, a 27.7% lead. Floating point math also favors Intel heavily: 61549 versus 47533, a 22.8% margin. Data compression goes to Intel at 314995 versus 292698, a 7.1% edge, and random string sorting favors Intel at 32346 versus 30266, a 6.4% margin.

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS wins three tests, and they are notable for their specificity. The largest AMD victory is in passmark_data_encryption, where it scores 18104 against Intel's 16731, an 8.2% lead. This suggests the AMD chip's cryptographic instruction handling is more efficient. AMD also wins passmark_integer_math with 84228 versus 82017, a 2.7% margin, and passmark_extended_instructions with 20114 versus 19816, a 1.5% edge. These wins are narrow but consistent, pointing to strengths in integer-heavy and instruction-extension workloads rather than in floating-point or physics simulations.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400 is the clear choice for rendering and content creation. Its 43.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore and 51.6% lead in single-core make it the superior processor for 3D rendering, video encoding, and any workload that scales across cores. The 22.8% win in floating-point math reinforces this, as that benchmark often correlates with scientific computing and simulation tasks. The 30% lead in prime number finding and 27.7% lead in physics further cement Intel's position for computational and physics-based workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS wins in security and encryption-related tasks. The 8.2% lead in data encryption is the most significant AMD victory, indicating better AES or similar cryptographic performance. The 2.7% win in integer math and 1.5% win in extended instructions suggest that the AMD architecture handles general-purpose integer operations and newer instruction sets slightly better. These wins are not large, but they are consistent across three distinct tests, indicating a pattern rather than a single anomaly.

For everyday multitasking and general productivity, the data leans toward Intel. The 9.1% lead in PassMark multithread and 7.1% lead in data compression suggest that the i5-14400 handles mixed workloads and file operations more quickly. The single-thread wins across Geekbench and PassMark (13.3% and 14.9% respectively) make Intel the better choice for applications that rely on single-core responsiveness, such as web browsing, office applications, and legacy software.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-14400 is the overwhelmingly stronger processor in raw performance. With 14 wins out of 17 head-to-head tests and a 51.6% maximum lead, the data supports Intel for anyone who prioritizes speed in rendering, physics simulation, or single-threaded applications. The i5-14400's 82nd percentile ranking versus all CPUs, compared to AMD's 83rd percentile, shows they sit at nearly the same overall performance level, but the Intel chip achieves this with a higher average benchmark score of 32115 versus AMD's 32354. The delta is tiny — AMD's average is actually 0.7% higher — but the distribution of wins heavily favors Intel.

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is the choice for specific security-sensitive workloads. Its 8.2% encryption lead and 2.7% integer math win make it a better fit for database encryption, secure communications, or integer-heavy data processing. The data also shows the AMD chip is more efficient in terms of power: its 35W TDP versus Intel's 65W TDP means it delivers comparable average performance at roughly half the thermal design power. For laptop users who need encryption performance and can accept lower rendering scores, the 6800HS makes sense. For desktop users who want maximum performance across the broadest range of tasks, the i5-14400 is the clear pick.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS has an average benchmark score of 32354, while the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115. The difference is 0.7% in AMD's favor, despite Intel winning 14 of 17 head-to-head tests.

Q: How large is the Cinebench R23 multicore gap?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 scores 21315 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 11992. This represents a 43.7% lead for Intel, the largest multicore margin in the benchmark set.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any benchmark by a wide margin?

A: No. AMD's largest win is in passmark_data_encryption, where it leads by 8.2% (18104 versus 16731). Its other wins are 2.7% in integer math and 1.5% in extended instructions, all relatively narrow margins.

Q: What is the difference in single-core Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 scores 3009, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 1455. This gives Intel a 51.6% advantage, which is the largest percentage difference of any test in the comparison.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has a TDP of 65W, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS has a TDP of 35W. This makes the AMD chip more power-efficient, though the Intel chip delivers higher performance in most tests.

Q: How do their PassMark single-thread scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 scores 3741 in passmark_single_thread, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 3184. This gives Intel a 14.9% lead in single-threaded performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, built on a 6nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10nm process at Intel. The process node difference is significant: AMD's 6nm node is smaller, which typically allows for better power efficiency, while Intel's 10nm node is older but the architecture compensates with higher clock speeds and more cores.

The core counts differ substantially. AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Intel chip achieves its thread count with a mix of performance and efficiency cores, a design choice that AMD does not employ. The cache hierarchies also differ: AMD has 64KB of L1 cache per core, 512KB of L2 per core, and 16MB of shared L3 cache. Intel has 80KB of L1 per core, 1.25MB of L2 per core, and 20MB of shared L3 cache. Intel's larger L2 and L3 caches likely contribute to its single-thread performance advantage.

The integrated graphics differ as well. AMD pairs the 6800HS with a Radeon 680M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The benchmark data does not include graphics tests, so the comparison is limited to CPU performance, but the hardware specifications show AMD's integrated solution is positioned for more demanding graphics work. Memory support also diverges: AMD supports DDR5 exclusively, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving Intel systems more flexibility in memory selection.

Specification Differences

The most notable specification difference is the TDP. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS has a TDP of 35W, making it a mobile-focused part, while the Intel Core i5-14400 has a TDP of 65W, indicating a desktop-oriented design. This aligns with their market segments: AMD is listed as Mobile, and Intel is listed as Desktop.

The sockets are incompatible. AMD uses AMD Socket FP7, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. This means the processors are not interchangeable in any system. The base clocks differ, with AMD starting at 3.20GHz and Intel at 2.50GHz, but both boost to the same 4.70GHz maximum. The process nodes differ as noted, with AMD at 6nm and Intel at 10nm, and the die sizes are close: 208mm² for AMD and 215mm² for Intel.

PCIe support differs in generation and lane count. AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Intel's PCIe 5.0 support is a generational advantage for storage and graphics bandwidth. ECC memory support also differs: AMD does not support ECC, while Intel does. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-14400 is $221, while no MSRP is listed for the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS. The Intel part has a listed release date of January 7, 2024, while AMD's release date is not provided. Both processors are currently marked as Active in production status.