AMD Ryzen 7 5825U vs AMD Ryzen 7 7730U Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 7730U and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U are near-identical twins on paper, but benchmark results reveal a split personality. The 7730U is the multi-core champion, while the 5825U takes the single-threaded crown. With 17 head-to-head benchmarks, the 5825U wins 10 and the 7730U wins 7, yet the 7730U secures the larger victories in the most demanding tests. The data shows that these are not interchangeable parts; the choice depends entirely on workload priority.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The 7730U’s most decisive win comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 10801.5 against the 5825U’s 10152, a 6.4% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and signals that the 7730U is better suited for sustained, heavily threaded productivity. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test reinforces this trend, with the 7730U posting 1830 versus 1757, a 4.2% lead. These two wins are the 7730U’s strongest statements, suggesting that its refresh architecture extracts more performance when all eight cores are under load.

The 5825U, however, dominates the Geekbench suite. In Geekbench multi-core, it scores 7288 against the 7730U’s 6565 — a 9.9% lead that is the largest margin in either direction across all tests. The single-core Geekbench result is also in the 5825U’s favor, 1618 versus 1541, a 4.8% gap. This makes the 5825U the better choice for applications that rely on short bursts of high-frequency work, such as web browsing, office tasks, and light code compilation.

In the Passmark suite, the results are more fragmented. The 7730U wins data compression (225023 vs 221938, +1.4%), data encryption (14258 vs 14088, +1.2%), extended instructions (14619 vs 14394, +1.6%), and random string sorting (23651 vs 23539, +0.5%). These are all modest margins, but they consistently favor the 7730U in memory-intensive and cryptographic workloads. The 5825U counters with wins in find prime numbers (48 vs 45, +6.2%), physics (774 vs 751, +3%), floating point math (38482 vs 38460, +0.1%), integer math (72577 vs 72352, +0.3%), and multithread (18131 vs 18037, +0.5%). The 5825U’s Passmark single-thread score is 3053 versus 3004, a 1.6% edge.

The overall picture is clear: the 7730U is built for throughput, while the 5825U favors latency and single-core response. The 7730U’s average benchmark score is 25625, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. The 5825U’s average score is 25446, also in the 78th percentile. These are statistically equivalent overall scores, but the distribution of wins matters more than the aggregate. The 7730U is 0.7% ahead on average, yet it loses the majority of individual tests.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same fundamental design: Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm TSMC process, with 8 cores and 16 threads. The transistor count is identical at 10,700 million, and the die size is the same at 180 mm². The cache hierarchy is also unchanged, with 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Both run at a 2000 MHz base clock and a 4500 MHz boost clock, with a 15 W TDP. The socket is the same AMD Socket FP6, and both support dual-channel DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC.

The key differentiator is the codename and release timing. The 7730U is part of the 7000 series, codenamed Barcelo-R, released on 2023-01-03. The 5825U is from the 5000 series, codenamed Barcelo, released one year earlier on 2022-01-05. The 7730U’s “-R” suffix indicates a refresh, and the benchmark data suggests that refresh focused on multi-core tuning rather than architectural changes.

The integrated graphics differ in naming: the 7730U features Radeon Graphics (Vega 8), while the 5825U lists Radeon Vega 8. This is a nominal difference; the underlying GPU is the same Vega 8 design. Both CPUs support PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers differ (100-000000942 for the 7730U, 100-000000580 for the 5825U), but the physical package and power envelope are identical.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7730U has an average benchmark score of 25625, which is 0.7% higher than the 5825U’s 25446. Both are in the 78th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Is there a significant difference in multi-core Cinebench performance?

A: Yes. The 7730U scores 10801.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core versus 10152 for the 5825U, a 6.4% advantage. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 7730U leads 1830 to 1757, a 4.2% margin.

Q: Which CPU wins in Geekbench tests?

A: The 5825U wins both Geekbench tests. It scores 7288 in multi-core (9.9% ahead of the 7730U’s 6565) and 1618 in single-core (4.8% ahead of the 7730U’s 1541).

Q: Do the two CPUs have identical clock speeds?

A: Yes. Both have a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 4500 MHz. The TDP is also identical at 15 W.

Q: What is the memory and cache configuration?

A: Both support dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC. The cache is identical: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3.

Q: How many benchmarks does each processor win?

A: The 5825U wins 10 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, while the 7730U wins 7. The 7730U’s wins are generally larger in magnitude, particularly in multi-core Cinebench tests.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in only a few documented fields. The series name is different: 7000 series for the 7730U versus 5000 series for the 5825U. The codename also differs: Barcelo-R for the 7730U and Barcelo for the 5825U. The release dates are different, with the 7730U launching on 2023-01-03 and the 5825U on 2022-01-05. The integrated graphics name is listed differently: Radeon Graphics (Vega 8) for the 7730U versus Radeon Vega 8 for the 5825U. Finally, the part numbers differ: 100-000000942 for the 7730U and 100-000000580 for the 5825U.

All other specifications are identical: 8 cores, 16 threads, 2000 MHz base clock, 4500 MHz boost clock, 15 W TDP, AMD Socket FP6, Zen 3 architecture, 7 nm process, TSMC foundry, 10,700 million transistors, 180 mm² die size, 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, 16 MB shared L3, DDR4 memory support, dual-channel bus, 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, ECC support, PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, and an unlocked multiplier set to false.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split: the 7730U is the multi-core workhorse, and the 5825U is the single-thread specialist. The 7730U’s 6.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4.2% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core are the most substantial performance gaps in the entire comparison. These are the benchmarks that matter most for video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. If the workload is heavily threaded, the 7730U is the better choice, despite losing the overall benchmark count.

The 5825U, however, wins the single-core battle decisively. Its 9.9% lead in Geekbench multi-core is anomalous given its loss in Cinebench multi-core, but its 4.8% lead in Geekbench single-core and 1.6% lead in Passmark single-thread are consistent. For everyday responsiveness, office applications, and lightly threaded games, the 5825U offers a measurable advantage. The 5825U also wins in physics (774 vs 751, +3%) and prime number calculation (48 vs 45, +6.2%), which are indicators of integer-heavy, latency-sensitive performance.

For users who prioritize raw throughput in rendering or batch processing, the 7730U is the clear winner. For users who value snappy single-core response and lighter workloads, the 5825U is the better fit. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, but the distribution of wins means that there is no neutral choice — the right CPU depends on the specific application mix.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen 7 7730U: The 7730U wins in all multi-core Cinebench tests, data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting. This makes it the best option for video editing, 3D rendering, database operations, and any workload that scales across all 8 cores and 16 threads. The 6.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the largest single advantage in the comparison, indicating that the refresh architecture specifically improves sustained multi-core performance.

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U: The 5825U wins in Geekbench multi-core and single-core, Passmark single-thread, floating point math, integer math, multithread, physics, and prime number calculation. This makes it the better choice for general desktop use, web browsing, office productivity, and applications that respond to high single-core clock speeds. The 9.9% lead in Geekbench multi-core is the largest margin in either direction, suggesting that the 5825U excels in synthetic workloads that mix integer and floating point operations with short bursts of activity. For users who spend most of their time in lightweight, interactive applications, the 5825U delivers a more responsive experience.