AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Intel Core i3-12300 Comparison

The benchmark data shows a clear, if narrow, overall victory for the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C. It wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests against the Intel Core i3-12300, with margins ranging from 1.2% to 1.4%. While the Intel part is no slouch, the AMD processor’s consistent lead across single-core and multi-core workloads makes it the default choice in a direct performance comparison, despite the Intel chip’s higher base clock and desktop-oriented design.

The Verdict

From the data, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is the pick for any workload where maximum throughput is the goal. Its wins in every multi-core test, including a 12376 vs 12211 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core, show that its 8 cores and 16 threads deliver a tangible, if modest, advantage over the Intel Core i3-12300’s 4 cores and 8 threads. The single-core results are similarly one-sided, with the AMD part taking Cinebench R23 single-core 1747 to 1724, proving that its lower base clock does not translate into a performance deficit. For users who want the highest possible benchmark scores in Cinebench, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is the clear winner.

The Intel Core i3-12300 is not without its merits, but the benchmark data does not provide a single test where it comes out ahead. Its strengths lie in its platform features and specifications, not in the measured Cinebench performance. With a 60W TDP versus the AMD’s 15W, the Intel chip is positioned for desktop systems where power draw is less of a constraint. This makes it a viable option for builders who prioritize the Intel Socket 1700 platform, PCIe Gen 5 support, or DDR5 memory compatibility, even if the raw Cinebench scores are slightly lower.

Ultimately, the choice depends on the user’s priorities. If the sole criterion is Cinebench score, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C wins. If platform features like PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 support are more important than a 1.3% average score difference, then the Intel Core i3-12300 becomes the more sensible choice. The data does not support a verdict for the Intel chip on performance alone, given its 0 wins in the head-to-head.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is built on TSMC’s 7 nm process node and uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne-U. It is a mobile-focused chip with a 15W TDP and an AMD Socket FP6. In contrast, the Intel Core i3-12300 uses Intel’s 10 nm process and the Alder Lake architecture, specifically Alder Lake-S, designed for desktop systems with a 60W TDP and an Intel Socket 1700.

The most significant architectural divergence is in core count. The AMD chip packs 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel chip has only 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives the AMD part a theoretical multi-threading advantage, which is reflected in its consistent multi-core benchmark wins. The cache layouts also differ: the AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip has larger per-core caches of 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2, but a smaller shared 12 MB L3.

The process technology and foundry also represent a key difference. AMD uses TSMC’s 7 nm process, while Intel uses its own 10 nm process. The AMD chip integrates a Radeon Vega 8 graphics unit, whereas the Intel chip features UHD Graphics 730. Memory support is another differentiator: the AMD chip supports only DDR4, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel chip also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, compared to the AMD chip’s PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i3-12300 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C wins all multi-core tests, with a 1.4% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core (1247 vs 1230) and a 1.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core (12376 vs 12211).

Q: Does the Intel chip win any single-core tests?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C wins every single-core test, including Cinebench R20 single-core (733 vs 724) and Cinebench R23 single-core (1747 vs 1724).

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has a 15W TDP. The Intel Core i3-12300 has a 60W TDP.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core i3-12300 supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C supports only DDR4.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has an average benchmark score of 3579. The Intel Core i3-12300 has an average benchmark score of 3532.

Specification Differences

• Cores: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has 8 cores; Intel Core i3-12300 has 4 cores.
• Threads: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has 16 threads; Intel Core i3-12300 has 8 threads.
• Base Clock: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C runs at 2000.00 MHz; Intel Core i3-12300 runs at 3.50 GHz.
• Boost Clock: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C boosts to 4.50 GHz; Intel Core i3-12300 boosts to 4.40 GHz.
• TDP: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has a 15W TDP; Intel Core i3-12300 has a 60W TDP.
• Socket: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C uses AMD Socket FP6; Intel Core i3-12300 uses Intel Socket 1700.
• Process Node: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is on 7 nm (TSMC); Intel Core i3-12300 is on 10 nm (Intel).
• L1 Cache: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has 64 KB per core; Intel Core i3-12300 has 80 KB per core.
• L2 Cache: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has 512 KB per core; Intel Core i3-12300 has 1.25 MB per core.
• L3 Cache: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has 16 MB shared; Intel Core i3-12300 has 12 MB shared.
• Memory Support: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C supports DDR4; Intel Core i3-12300 supports DDR4 and DDR5.
• PCIe: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has Gen 3 with 8 lanes; Intel Core i3-12300 has Gen 5 with 20 lanes.
• Integrated Graphics: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has Radeon Vega 8; Intel Core i3-12300 has UHD Graphics 730.
• Market Segment: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is for Mobile; Intel Core i3-12300 is for Desktop.
• Die Size: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is 180 mm²; Intel Core i3-12300 is 163 mm².
• Part Number: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is 100-000000xxx; Intel Core i3-12300 is SRL61.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C sweeps the entire benchmark suite. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 1247 against the Intel’s 1230, a 1.4% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar pattern, with the AMD part winning 175 to 173, a 1.2% margin. Moving to Cinebench R20, the AMD chip scores 5197 multi-core versus 5128 for the Intel chip, a 1.3% lead, and 733 single-core versus 724, another 1.2% win.

The largest delta appears in the multi-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C posts 12376, while the Intel Core i3-12300 manages 12211. That 1.4% difference is the biggest gap in the entire head-to-head. The single-core R23 test is closer, with the AMD chip winning 1747 to 1724, a 1.3% margin. Across all six tests, the average delta is approximately 1.3%, with the AMD processor winning every time.

The Intel chip’s performance is remarkably close, with no test exceeding a 1.4% deficit. Its 4-core, 8-thread configuration with a 4.40 GHz boost clock keeps it competitive, but the AMD’s 8-core, 16-thread design at a lower boost clock edges it out. The data shows that the Intel chip’s higher base clock of 3.50 GHz does not translate into a single-core win, as the AMD chip’s 2000.00 MHz base clock is compensated by its architecture and cache design.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C wins every benchmark category. It is the superior choice for multi-core rendering, as evidenced by its 5197 score in Cinebench R20 multi-core versus 5128 for the Intel. It also wins single-core performance, taking Cinebench R15 single-core 175 to 173. For any user running Cinebench workloads, the AMD chip is unequivocally the better performer.

The Intel Core i3-12300 has no benchmark wins to claim. However, its strengths are in the platform and ecosystem. It supports DDR5 memory, which the AMD chip does not, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes versus the AMD’s PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes. This makes the Intel chip a better fit for a new desktop build where these modern standards are desired. Its 60W TDP also indicates it is designed for a desktop environment where power efficiency is less critical.

In practical terms, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is for users who want maximum Cinebench scores in a low-power mobile package. The Intel Core i3-12300 is for users building a desktop system who prioritize PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 support over a marginal performance difference. The data shows the AMD chip is faster, but the Intel chip offers a more modern platform feature set.