AMD Ryzen 7 5800H vs Intel Core 3 100HL Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Core 3 100HL
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H vs Intel Core 3 100HL
The Intel Core 3 100HL and AMD Ryzen 7 5800H are both 8-core processors aimed at different segments, yet their benchmark results reveal a fascinating split. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H wins the majority of head-to-head tests, taking 10 of 15, while the Intel Core 3 100HL counters with decisive victories in newer Cinebench workloads and single-threaded tasks. Both processors sit at the 76th percentile of all CPUs, with nearly identical average benchmark scores (23,545 for Intel vs. 23,277 for AMD), indicating they occupy the same performance tier despite their architectural differences.
The Verdict
The data points to a clear distinction in workload suitability. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H is the better choice for multi-threaded productivity and content creation, as it leads in classic Cinebench R15 multi-core by 24.9% (2005 vs. 1506) and in PassMark integer math by 30.3% (80,786 vs. 56,308). Its 16 threads, enabled by simultaneous multithreading, provide a tangible advantage in heavily parallel workloads, as reflected in its PassMark multi-thread score of 20,789 versus Intel's 17,586. The Ryzen also dominates memory-intensive tasks like data compression, scoring 270,608 against Intel's 202,225, a 25.3% lead.
Conversely, the Intel Core 3 100HL is the pick for single-threaded responsiveness and modern rendering engines. It crushes the Ryzen in Cinebench R23 single-core by 49% (2,110 vs. 1,416) and leads in PassMark single-thread by 23.6% (3,735 vs. 3,021). Its R23 multi-core score of 14,948 is 23.6% higher than AMD's 12,091.5, suggesting newer software optimizations favor Intel's architecture. The Intel part also wins the PassMark physics test (928 vs. 830, an 11.8% lead), indicating better performance in simulation workloads.
For a user prioritizing older, well-threaded applications or data-heavy tasks, the Ryzen 7 5800H is the data-backed winner. For those running modern rendering, single-threaded applications, or physics simulations, the Intel Core 3 100HL provides superior results. Neither chip is a universal victor; the choice depends entirely on the software mix.
Architecture Differences
The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core 3 100HL is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, using the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename. It features 8 cores and 12 threads, indicating a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the exact core arrangement. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and its PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 48 execution units, and the chip uses the Intel Socket 1700.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H is a Zen 3 part from the Cezanne codename, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, using simultaneous multithreading to double thread count. The cache design is distinct: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a larger 16 MB shared L3 cache. It supports only DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a specified memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s. Its PCIe interface is Gen 3, and it pairs with the Radeon Vega 8 integrated GPU. The socket is AMD Socket FP6, and the chip has 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The process node advantage (7 nm vs. 10 nm) likely contributes to the Ryzen's higher base clock of 3.20 GHz versus Intel's 2.10 GHz, though Intel's boost clock is slightly higher at 4.60 GHz versus 4.40 GHz.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more threads, and does that matter?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H has 16 threads versus Intel's 12, and this directly impacts multi-threaded performance. The Ryzen leads in PassMark multi-thread by 15.4% (20,789 vs. 17,586) and in Cinebench R15 multi-core by 24.9% (2005 vs. 1506), showing the thread advantage matters in older, well-parallelized workloads.
Q: Why does the Intel chip win Cinebench R23 multi-core despite having fewer threads?
A: The Intel Core 3 100HL scores 14,948 versus AMD's 12,091.5 in R23 multi-core, a 23.6% lead. This suggests the Raptor Lake architecture's single-thread efficiency (49% higher R23 single-core score) compensates for fewer threads, and newer Cinebench versions may better leverage Intel's design.
Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?
A: The Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics with 48 execution units, while the AMD part has Radeon Vega 8. The fact pack does not include graphics benchmark scores, so no numerical comparison is possible; the choice depends on software support and driver preferences.
Q: What memory types does each support?
A: The Intel Core 3 100HL supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H supports only DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the Intel part offers future-proofing with DDR5 compatibility.
Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock, and what does that mean for single-threaded tasks?
A: The Intel Core 3 100HL boosts to 4.60 GHz versus AMD's 4.40 GHz. This higher boost clock correlates with Intel's 23.6% lead in PassMark single-thread (3,735 vs. 3,021) and its 49% advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core (2,110 vs. 1,416).
Q: Are these processors unlocked for overclocking?
A: No, both have the multiplier locked, so neither offers user-controlled overclocking. Their performance is fixed by their stock boost behavior.
Specification Differences
The core specifications diverge on several key points. The Intel Core 3 100HL has 8 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock differs significantly: Intel's is 2.10 GHz, while AMD's is 3.20 GHz. The boost clocks are closer, with Intel at 4.60 GHz and AMD at 4.40 GHz. The process nodes differ, with Intel on 10 nm and AMD on 7 nm, fabricated by different foundries (Intel vs. TSMC). Cache sizes vary: Intel has 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core, while AMD has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core. The L3 cache is larger on AMD at 16 MB shared versus Intel's 12 MB shared. Memory support differs (DDR4/DDR5 for Intel, DDR4 only for AMD), and PCIe generations differ (Gen 4 for Intel, Gen 3 for AMD). The integrated GPUs are different (Iris Xe 48EU vs. Radeon Vega 8). The sockets are incompatible (Socket 1700 vs. FP6). The AMD chip has a specified transistor count of 10,700 million and die size of 180 mm², while Intel's are not listed. The release dates differ: Intel's is April 2024, while AMD's is January 2021. Finally, the AMD chip has a part number (100-000000295), while Intel's is unknown.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark results paint a clear picture of each chip's strengths. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H dominates in older and data-centric tests. Its largest victory is in PassMark extended instructions, where it scores 18,203 versus Intel's 12,463, a 31.5% lead. It also wins PassMark integer math by 30.3% (80,786 vs. 56,308) and data encryption by 29.5% (16,962 vs. 11,964). In data compression, the Ryzen scores 270,608 against Intel's 202,225, a 25.3% margin. The Ryzen also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 24.9% (2005 vs. 1506) and random string sorting by 17.5% (28,144 vs. 23,223). It takes PassMark multi-thread by 15.4% (20,789 vs. 17,586) and floating point math by 5.3% (44,479 vs. 42,108). Even the closest test, passmark find prime numbers, goes to AMD by 2% (49 vs. 48). The Ryzen also wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 7.4% (229 vs. 212).
The Intel Core 3 100HL counters with decisive wins in modern and single-threaded tests. Its most dominant victory is Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 2,110 versus AMD's 1,416, a 49% lead. It also wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 23.6% (14,948 vs. 12,091.5) and PassMark single-thread by 23.6% (3,735 vs. 3,021). The Intel chip wins PassMark physics by 11.8% (928 vs. 830). These results suggest that while AMD's older architecture excels in legacy multi-threaded and data-heavy workloads, Intel's newer Raptor Lake design offers superior performance in current rendering engines and single-threaded applications. The head-to-head tally is 10 wins for AMD and 5 for Intel, but the magnitude of Intel's single-core and R23 victories indicates a generational advantage in specific, modern tasks.