AMD Ryzen 7 5705G vs Intel Core Ultra 7 366H Comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 5705G vs Intel Core Ultra 7 366H: the data represents a desktop processor from AMD’s 5000 series against a mobile chip from Intel’s Core Ultra Series 3. The Ryzen 7 5705G is built on the Zen 3 architecture with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 366H uses the Panther Lake architecture with 16 cores and 16 threads. Benchmark results show the Intel part ranking in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its average score at zero. The analysis below relies entirely on the recorded data for the Intel processor and the architectural specifications provided for both.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H wins in every measured benchmark category, as the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has no recorded scores in the database. The Intel part’s strongest areas are multithreaded workloads, where it delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28477, and memory-intensive tasks, supported by 115.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Ryzen 7 5705G’s advantage lies in its desktop positioning: it uses a 65 W TDP with an unlocked multiplier, making it suitable for systems where power constraints are less critical and overclocking is permitted. The Intel part, by contrast, has a 25 W TDP and a locked multiplier, fitting its mobile market segment.

The data indicates the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is designed for high throughput across mixed workloads, with a Passmark multithread score of 33429 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4043. Its 16 cores, though matching its thread count, provide parallel processing capability that shows in tasks like data compression (327455 in Passmark) and floating-point math (103615). The Ryzen 7 5705G, with 8 cores and 16 threads, relies on simultaneous multithreading to handle concurrent tasks, but without recorded measurements, its comparative performance cannot be quantified. The AMD part’s integrated Radeon Graphics 512SP and DDR4 memory support suggest a focus on compatibility with existing AM4 platforms, while the Intel part’s DDR5 and LPDDR5X support aligns with newer memory standards.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is the clear choice for users prioritizing raw benchmark performance. Its 87th percentile ranking places it ahead of 87% of all CPUs in the database, and its average benchmark score of 41263 reflects consistent high output. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G’s average score of zero and 50th percentile ranking indicate that no performance data exists for it, making any performance-based selection impossible. The Intel part excels in both single-core and multi-core tests, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4020 and a multicore score of 28477, confirming its suitability for demanding applications.

For users who require a desktop processor with an unlocked multiplier and a 65 W TDP, the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G offers flexibility that the Intel part cannot match, but the lack of benchmark scores means its real-world speed is unknown from this dataset. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, with its 16 cores and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, delivers measurable performance across all recorded tests, making it the only objectively verifiable option here. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors, so the verdict rests solely on the Intel part’s comprehensive score set versus the AMD part’s absence of data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark results are recorded for these two processors, so a direct comparison of scores is impossible. However, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H’s individual benchmark results provide a full picture of its performance. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2870 in multicore and 405 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score rises to 11960, with a single-core score of 1688. The Cinebench R23 results show a multicore score of 28477 and a single-core score of 4020, indicating strong scaling across versions. Passmark tests further detail its capabilities: data compression hits 327455, data encryption reaches 25845, extended instructions score 26901, prime number finding scores 326, floating-point math achieves 103615, integer math records 83695, multithread scores 33429, physics scores 2880, random string sorting scores 39814, and single-thread scores 4043.

The nearest rivals to the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, based on average benchmark scores, include Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41215, 0.1% slower), AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (41208, 0.1% slower), AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41376, 0.3% faster), and Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (40967, 0.7% slower). These deltas are narrow, showing the 366H sits within a competitive cluster. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has no such rival data, reinforcing its lack of measured standing. For users comparing the 366H to other processors, the data shows it is effectively tied with the 356H and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, slightly behind the Ryzen 9 5900X, and slightly ahead of the Ultra X7 358H in average score.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H’s best benchmark result?

A: Its highest recorded score is in Passmark data compression at 327455, followed by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28477.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H?

A: The 366H has an average benchmark score of 41263, while the 356H scores 41215, making the 366H 0.1% faster in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmarks for the Ryzen 7 5705G, so its average benchmark score is 0 and it has no nearest rival comparisons.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G supports DDR4, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: What is the core count difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has 16 cores and 16 threads, whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G uses the Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 180 mm² and 10,700 million transistors. Its cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The processor is an unlocked desktop part on AMD Socket AM4, with a 65 W TDP, and integrates Radeon Graphics with 512 shaders. Its release date is February 2025, and it is currently active in production.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H uses the Panther Lake architecture on a 3 nm process from Intel, though transistor count and die size are not recorded. Its cache includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, more than double the AMD part’s bandwidth. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only), and integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics. The processor is a mobile part on Intel BGA 2540, with a 25 W TDP and a locked multiplier, released in January 2026. It has 16 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Key differences include process node (7 nm versus 3 nm), cache hierarchy (smaller per-core L1 and L2 on AMD, larger on Intel), memory generation (DDR4 versus DDR5/LPDDR5X), PCIe generation (Gen 3 versus Gen 5), and market segment (desktop versus mobile). The Intel part’s higher memory bandwidth and newer PCIe standard support faster data transfer, while the AMD part’s unlocked multiplier and lower TDP (though higher than Intel’s 25 W) cater to desktop overclocking. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both have integrated graphics, but the Intel part’s Xe3 Graphics and the AMD part’s Radeon 512SP differ in architecture without recorded performance comparisons. The Intel part’s 18 MB L3 cache is larger than the AMD part’s 16 MB, and its per-core cache sizes are significantly bigger, which may influence single-threaded efficiency in measured workloads.