AMD Ryzen 7 5705G vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core 7 360 includes a substantial set of benchmark results, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible. However, the Intel Core 7 360's absolute performance can be measured against its nearest rivals in the database, which provides context for its standing.

The Intel Core 7 360 achieves an average benchmark score of 18374. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i3-13100, scores 18380, a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core 5 330 sits 0.2 percent behind, with a score of 18345. The Intel Core i3-14100 trails by 0.3 percent at 18318, and the Intel Core 3 305 is 0.4 percent behind at 18302. These deltas are extremely small, placing the Core 7 360 in a tight cluster of comparable processors.

In specific workloads, the Core 7 360 shows clear strengths. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13634 indicates strong parallel processing capability for a 6-core, 6-thread part. The single-core score of 1924 in the same test confirms solid per-thread performance. In PassMark tests, the data compression score of 142877 is notably high, as is the floating point math result of 44963. Integer math reaches 34238, and multithread performance scores 15544.

The single-thread PassMark result of 4274 is consistent with the R23 single-core figure, showing that the processor sustains high clock speeds under single-threaded loads. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz supports this observation. Extended instructions score 12390, and random string sorting reaches 17636. Data encryption hits 11164, while physics simulation scores 1213. The find prime numbers test produces a score of 120, which is a lower result relative to the other PassMark subtests.

Since the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G lacks benchmark entries, the database cannot quantify how it would fare against the Core 7 360 in any of these tests. The wins count is 0 for each processor in the head-to-head field, as no paired benchmark data exists. The percentile ranking tells a partial story: the Core 7 360 sits at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Ryzen 7 5705G is at the 50th percentile. That gap suggests the Intel part occupies a higher overall performance tier, but without direct measurements on the AMD side, this remains an inference from aggregate rankings rather than a tested result.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 360 have more cores than the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part supports simultaneous multithreading, doubling its thread count, whereas the Intel part does not.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 boosts to 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G's boost clock of 4.60 GHz. However, the AMD part has a much higher base clock of 3.80 GHz compared to the Intel part's 1.50 GHz.

Q: How do the memory support options differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G supports DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a single-channel bus with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Intel part has a higher theoretical memory bandwidth despite the single-channel configuration.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core 7 360 has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel part draws substantially less power according to its rated thermal design power.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part also has larger per-core L2 cache at 512 KB per core, though the Intel part has a larger per-core L1 cache at 192 KB per core versus 64 KB per core on the AMD.

Q: What is the market segment for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G is a desktop processor using the AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel Core 7 360 is a mobile processor using the Intel BGA 1516 socket. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Intel part is locked.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, built on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It integrates 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, built on a 3 nm process by Intel, with no transistor count or die size recorded in the database.

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD part provides 8 cores and 16 threads, leveraging simultaneous multithreading to double its logical processor count. The Intel part provides 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyperthreading capability. This gives the AMD processor a 2-core and 10-thread advantage in raw thread count, which typically benefits heavily parallel workloads.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 360 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has significantly more L1 and L2 cache per core, while the AMD part has more total L3 cache.

Memory architecture diverges markedly. The AMD processor uses dual-channel DDR4 memory, while the Intel processor uses single-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X. Despite the single-channel bus, the Intel part's memory bandwidth is listed at 59.7 GB/s, which is higher than the AMD part's 51.2 GB/s. This suggests the faster DDR5 standard offsets the bandwidth penalty of a single channel.

PCIe support also differs. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G provides Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel Core 7 360 provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. The Intel part supports a newer PCIe generation but offers far fewer lanes. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

The integrated graphics solutions are distinct as well. The AMD part includes Radeon Graphics with 512 shader processors. The Intel part includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The database does not record benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so relative graphics performance cannot be assessed from the recorded data.

Process node differences are substantial: 7 nm for AMD versus 3 nm for Intel. The smaller Intel node likely contributes to its dramatically lower TDP of 15 watts versus 65 watts for the AMD part. The Intel processor is also a mobile part, while the AMD part targets desktop systems.

The Verdict

The data supports different choices depending on the workload and platform requirements. The Intel Core 7 360 has a clear performance ranking advantage at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G's 50th percentile. Its recorded benchmark scores demonstrate strong single-thread and multicore results for a 6-core mobile processor, with an average score of 18374 placing it alongside capable desktop-class parts like the Intel Core i3-13100 and Intel Core i3-14100.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G offers more cores and threads, a higher base clock, a larger L3 cache, and a desktop socket with an unlocked multiplier. These features make it appropriate for users who need maximum thread count and overclocking flexibility on a desktop AM4 platform. The Intel Core 7 360, with its 15-watt TDP and single-channel memory, is oriented toward mobile systems where power efficiency and compact integration take priority.

The memory bandwidth figures favor the Intel part despite its single-channel configuration, recording 59.7 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s for the AMD part. The PCIe situation is mixed: the AMD part offers more lanes at Gen 3, while the Intel part offers fewer lanes at Gen 4. The Intel part also supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, which are newer memory standards than DDR4.

Cache distribution tells a nuanced story. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, which are larger per-core allocations than the AMD part's 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core. The AMD part counters with 16 MB of L3 versus 6 MB on the Intel part. For workloads sensitive to per-core cache, the Intel part may have an advantage; for workloads that benefit from a large shared L3, the AMD part is stronger.

The lack of benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G prevents a definitive head-to-head score comparison. The Intel Core 7 360's measured results and its 72nd percentile ranking indicate it is a capable performer in its mobile segment. The AMD part's 50th percentile ranking, combined with its higher core count and desktop positioning, suggests it serves a different performance profile. Users prioritizing measured benchmark results and higher percentile ranking would favor the Intel part. Users prioritizing core count, thread count, overclocking, and desktop platform compatibility would favor the AMD part.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 7 5705G | Intel Core 7 360 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Not recorded |

| Codename | Cezanne | Wildcat Lake |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 6 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001800 | SAE3E |

| Release Date | 2025-02-23 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $426 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 72 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 18374 |