AMD Ryzen 7 5705G vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G and the Intel Core 7 350 occupy very different positions in the processor landscape, and the recorded data highlights a clear split between multi-threaded throughput and single-thread performance. The AMD part, a desktop chip with 8 cores and 16 threads, faces the Intel mobile processor with 6 cores and 6 threads. The benchmark results show that the Intel Core 7 350 leads in several single-thread and latency-sensitive tests, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G holds a strong advantage in raw parallel workloads, despite the Intel processor’s higher boost clock and more modern process node.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive win for the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G appears in the PassMark multithread test, where its score of 15170 reflects the benefit of 16 threads versus the Intel Core 7 350’s 6 threads. The Intel part does not have a score for this specific test in the database, but the AMD processor’s multithread result is 15170, which is a substantial figure for a 65 W desktop chip. In the PassMark data compression test, the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G scores 143123, a strong result that indicates efficient handling of parallel compression workloads. The Intel Core 7 350, by comparison, does not have a recorded score for data compression in the database, so the comparison rests on the AMD side’s absolute performance.

The Intel Core 7 350, however, dominates in single-thread tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel processor scores 2046, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has no recorded benchmark score in the database. This makes a direct comparison impossible, but the Intel figure of 2046 places it well above typical desktop results, and its 4.80 GHz boost clock suggests a strong single-thread capability. Similarly, in Cinebench R20 single-core, the Intel Core 7 350 scores 758, and in Cinebench R15 single-core, it scores 292. These numbers are consistent with a high-frequency, low-core-count design optimized for lightly threaded tasks.

In the PassMark single-thread test, the Intel Core 7 350 scores 4100, which is a high value for a mobile processor. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has no corresponding score in the database, so no delta can be calculated. The Intel processor’s 4100 single-thread score, combined with its 4.80 GHz boost clock, indicates that it excels in applications where one or two cores are the bottleneck. The AMD part’s 4.60 GHz boost clock is lower, and its Zen 3 architecture, while efficient, does not match the Intel part’s single-thread peak in the recorded data.

For multi-core Cinebench tests, the Intel Core 7 350 scores 8030 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 5373 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 1220 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. These results, while lower than what a 16-thread desktop chip would typically produce, are still respectable for a 15 W mobile processor. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has no Cinebench scores in the database, so the comparison is one-sided. The absence of benchmark data for the AMD part means that the head-to-head analysis relies on the Intel processor’s recorded scores and the AMD processor’s architectural specifications.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 350 wins in scenarios that depend on single-thread performance and high clock speeds. Its 4.80 GHz boost clock, combined with a 3 nm process node, gives it an edge in tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and light content creation where single-core performance matters most. The PassMark single-thread score of 4100 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2046 confirm that this processor handles latency-sensitive workloads with ease. The Intel part also shows strength in floating-point math, scoring 42809 in PassMark floating-point math, and in integer math, scoring 33734. These results indicate that it is well-suited for scientific calculations and financial modeling that rely on per-core arithmetic throughput.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G wins in multi-threaded workloads that can utilize all 16 threads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide a clear advantage in video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The PassMark multithread score of 15170 and the data compression score of 143123 suggest that the AMD processor excels in parallel tasks. The AMD part’s 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to the Intel part’s 6 MB of shared L3 cache, also helps in workloads with large working sets. For users running virtual machines or heavy multitasking, the AMD processor’s thread count is a decisive factor.

The Intel Core 7 350 also wins in power-constrained environments. With a TDP of 15 W, it is designed for mobile devices, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has a TDP of 65 W. This means the Intel processor can sustain high clocks in thin-and-light laptops without excessive heat, whereas the AMD part requires a more robust cooling solution. The Intel processor’s single-channel memory bus, while narrower than the AMD part’s dual-channel configuration, still delivers a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s, which is higher than the AMD part’s 51.2 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G uses the Zen 3 architecture, specifically the Cezanne codename, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. This architecture features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The die size is 180 mm², and the processor contains 10,700 million transistors. The AMD part supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes for the CPU, and it includes Radeon Graphics with 512 shader processors.

The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, built on a 3 nm process at Intel. It has 6 cores and 6 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache layout is different: 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a single-channel configuration, delivering a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. It uses PCIe Gen 4 with 6 lanes for the CPU, and it includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The Intel part has no recorded transistor count or die size in the database.

The process node difference is significant: 7 nm for the AMD part versus 3 nm for the Intel part. The smaller node allows the Intel processor to achieve higher clock speeds (4.80 GHz boost) while maintaining a lower TDP of 15 W. The AMD part, with its larger 7 nm node, uses more power (65 W) but offers more cores and threads. The cache differences also matter. The AMD processor’s 16 MB of L3 cache is larger than the Intel processor’s 6 MB, which can reduce memory latency in multi-threaded workloads. The Intel processor’s larger L1 and L2 caches per core (192 KB and 2.5 MB, respectively) help with single-thread performance.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in almost every key specification. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The base clock differs substantially: 3.80 GHz for the AMD part versus 1.50 GHz for the Intel part. The boost clock is closer, with the AMD part at 4.60 GHz and the Intel part at 4.80 GHz. The TDP is a major differentiator: 65 W for the AMD part versus 15 W for the Intel part.

The socket types are incompatible. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1516. The memory support differs: the AMD part supports DDR4 in dual-channel mode, while the Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in single-channel mode. The memory bandwidth is higher on the Intel part at 59.7 GB/s, compared to 51.2 GB/s for the AMD part. The PCIe support also differs: the AMD part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 4 with 6 lanes.

The integrated graphics are different. The AMD part includes Radeon Graphics with 512 shader processors, while the Intel part includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Intel part does not. The market segment differs: the AMD part is a desktop processor, while the Intel part is a mobile processor. The production status for both is Active. The release dates differ, with the AMD part released on 2025-02-23 and the Intel part on 2026-04-15. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $469, which is a single data point in the database.

The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17779, with a percentile rank of 71 among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 221TE with an average score of 17860 and a delta of -0.5%, the AMD EPYC 9374F with an average score of 17693 and a delta of 0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT with an average score of 17891 and a delta of -0.6%, and the Intel Core 5 120U with an average score of 17898 and a delta of -0.7%. These rivals are all within 1% of the Intel Core 7 350’s average score, indicating a tight cluster of performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50, with no rival data recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G’s boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 delivers 59.7 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G delivers 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5705G has a TDP of 65 W, while the Intel Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller process node?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 uses a 3 nm process node, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5705G uses a 7 nm process node.

Q: What is the Intel Core 7 350’s average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17779, with a percentile rank of 71 among all CPUs.