AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Intel Core 5 210H Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

CORE STATE Vermeer
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 96 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 105W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 210H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
6,764
N/A
3dmark_2_threads
1,575
N/A
3dmark_4_threads
3,097
N/A
3dmark_8_threads
5,357
N/A
3dmark_max_threads
6,755
N/A
3dmark_single_thread
804
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,254
1,757
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
318
247
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
9,393
6,504
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,325
918
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
22,366
11,830
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,157
1,771
geekbench_multicore
11,086
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
1,849
N/A
passmark_data_compression
307,237
217,805
passmark_data_encryption
18,788
12,187
passmark_extended_instructions
21,202
13,370
passmark_find_prime_numbers
224
53
passmark_floating_point_math
46,492
45,057
passmark_integer_math
81,257
61,503
passmark_multithread
26,318
18,252
passmark_physics
2,686
1,040
passmark_random_string_sorting
31,492
23,451
passmark_single_thread
2,970
3,539
passmark_singlethread
2,970
3,539

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Intel Core 5 210H

The benchmark data presents a clear split: the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D dominates in nearly every multi-threaded and compute-heavy workload, while the Intel Core 5 210H secures a decisive victory in a single-threaded PassMark test. Overall average scores are nearly identical, with the Intel part at 24872 and the AMD part at 24709, placing both in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. However, the distribution of wins—15 for AMD versus 2 for Intel—reveals that the Ryzen 7 5700X3D is the superior processor for demanding tasks, despite the Intel chip’s edge in one specific metric.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher overall average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 210H has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 24872, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D’s 24709. This difference is marginal, representing a delta of less than 1% between the two.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D perform in Cinebench R23 multi-core compared to the Intel Core 5 210H?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D scores 22366 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 47.1% higher than the Intel Core 5 210H’s score of 11830. This is the largest performance gap in the head-to-head results.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core 5 210H outperform the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D?

A: The Intel Core 5 210H wins in the PassMark single-thread test, scoring 3539 against the AMD’s 2970. This represents a 19.2% advantage for the Intel processor in that specific test.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: Both processors have 8 cores. The Intel Core 5 210H has 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D has 16 threads.

Q: What is the difference in their L3 cache sizes?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D has a significantly larger L3 cache of 96 MB (shared), whereas the Intel Core 5 210H has a 12 MB (shared) L3 cache.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 5 210H does not.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is the clear winner for multi-threaded performance, taking 15 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks. Its victories are not marginal; they are substantial across the board. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it leads by 47.1%, and in Cinebench R20 multi-core, it is ahead by 30.8%. This trend continues in PassMark tests, where it wins data compression by 29.1%, integer math by 24.3%, and multithread by 30.6%. The most extreme example is the PassMark find prime numbers test, where the AMD part scores 224 against Intel’s 53, a 76.3% advantage. For workloads like physics simulation, the AMD processor is also dominant, scoring 2686 in PassMark physics compared to Intel’s 1040, a 61.3% lead.

The Intel Core 5 210H’s wins are confined to the PassMark single-thread test, where it scores 3539 versus AMD’s 2970, a 19.2% advantage. This is a notable result, but it is the only category where Intel shows a clear edge. In all other single-core tests, such as Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD processor wins by 43.9%, and in Cinebench R15 single-core, it wins by 22.3%. The data suggests that while Intel has a specific strength in one synthetic single-thread metric, the AMD processor is faster in nearly every other scenario, including other single-core tests.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core 5 210H is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H codename, using a 10 nm process node from Intel’s own foundry. It is a mobile processor with a TDP of 45 watts, featuring 8 cores and 12 threads. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3.

In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. This is a desktop processor with a much higher TDP of 105 watts. It has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD chip’s cache configuration is drastically different, with 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a massive 96 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD processor also has a higher transistor count of 8,850 million on a 74 mm² die.

The process node difference is significant: AMD uses the more advanced 7 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process. This contributes to the AMD processor’s ability to pack more transistors and cache. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. The memory support differs as well, with Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR4. The PCIe capabilities also differ, with Intel offering Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only) and AMD offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Specification Differences

The specification sheets show several key differences beyond the architectural ones. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D has a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz compared to the Intel Core 5 210H’s 2.20 GHz. However, the Intel processor has a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus the AMD’s 4.10 GHz. The TDP is a major differentiator: Intel is rated at 45 watts, while AMD is rated at 105 watts.

The socket types are incompatible, with Intel using BGA 1744 and AMD using Socket AM4. The Intel part includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 48EU), while the AMD part has no integrated graphics (N/A). The memory bus is dual-channel for both, but the AMD processor has a specified memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, whereas the Intel part’s bandwidth is not listed. The AMD processor has ECC memory support (true), while the Intel does not (false). The release dates also differ, with Intel launching on 2024-12-17 and AMD launching on 2024-01-07. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 5 210H is $342, and for the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D it is $249.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are overwhelmingly in favor of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD scores 22366 against Intel’s 11830, a delta of -47.1%. This is the largest single benchmark gap. The Cinebench R20 multi-core test shows a similar pattern, with AMD at 9393 and Intel at 6504, a 30.8% difference. Even in single-core tests, AMD wins: Cinebench R23 single-core shows AMD at 3157 versus Intel’s 1771, a 43.9% lead, and Cinebench R15 single-core shows AMD at 318 versus Intel’s 247, a 22.3% lead.

In the PassMark suite, the AMD processor wins 10 of 11 tests. The data compression test shows AMD at 307237 versus Intel’s 217805, a 29.1% advantage. Data encryption is another clear win for AMD, with scores of 18788 versus 12187, a 35.1% lead. The extended instructions test shows AMD at 21202 and Intel at 13370, a 36.9% gap. The floating point math test is the closest result, with AMD at 46492 and Intel at 45057, a slim 3.1% advantage for AMD. Integer math goes to AMD by 24.3% (81257 vs 61503), and multithread goes to AMD by 30.6% (26318 vs 18252). The physics test is another dominant AMD win, with 2686 versus 1040, a 61.3% lead. Random string sorting favors AMD by 25.5% (31492 vs 23451).

The only two wins for the Intel Core 5 210H come in the PassMark single-thread test, where it scores 3539 versus AMD’s 2970, a 19.2% advantage. This is a consistent result across both listings of the same test (passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread). This single win does not offset the scale of AMD’s victories, which are often 20-40% or more.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is the superior processor for almost all workloads. It wins 15 of 17 benchmarks, with decisive margins in multi-core, physics, and compute-intensive tasks. The 47.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and the 76.3% lead in PassMark find prime numbers illustrate the AMD’s overwhelming advantage in parallel processing. For users running rendering, scientific computing, or heavy multitasking, the Ryzen 7 5700X3D is the clear choice based on benchmark results.

The Intel Core 5 210H’s sole claim to fame is its 19.2% win in PassMark single-thread. This indicates a specific strength in lightly-threaded tasks that rely on that particular metric. However, this is contradicted by other single-core tests where AMD wins, such as Cinebench R23 single-core with a 43.9% lead. If a user’s primary application relies on the exact PassMark single-thread workload, the Intel chip has an edge, but this is a narrow scenario.

Given that both processors have the same 77th percentile ranking and nearly identical average scores, the choice depends on the workload. For any multi-threaded or mixed workload, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is the verdict from the data. The Intel Core 5 210H is only preferable in the specific case of the PassMark single-thread test, where its higher boost clock and Raptor Lake architecture appear to give it a measurable advantage. For all other purposes, the AMD’s larger cache, higher thread count, and superior benchmark results make it the stronger option.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 5700X3D
5 210H
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
12 -25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3
2.2 -26.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.1
4.8 +17.1%
Frequency (GHz)
3
2.2 -26.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.1
4.8 +17.1%
Multiplier
30
22 -26.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
96 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
105
45 -57.1%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
PPT
142 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Raptor Lake
Codename
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-H
Generation
Ryzen 7 (Zen 3 (Vermeer))
Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,850 million
Die Size
74 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel BGA 1744
Chipsets
AMD 300 Series*, AMD 400 Series, AMD 500 Series
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1600 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
12 nm
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 48EU
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$249
$342
Part Number
100-000001503100-100001503WOF
SRQ6RQ5MN
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
90°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View Ryzen 7 5700X3D Details View Core 5 210H Details