AMD Ryzen 7 5700G vs Intel Core i7-13700H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-13700H dominates the head-to-head comparison, winning 17 of the 21 benchmark tests against the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G. The most lopsided victories come in compute-heavy workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 15,474 versus 12,830.5 for AMD, a 20.6% advantage. Single-core performance is even more decisive: the i7-13700H posts 1,856 in Cinebench R23 single-core, beating the Ryzen 7 5700G’s 1,494 by 24.2%. This pattern repeats across the 3DMark suite, where Intel wins 16-thread (6,885 vs 6,629, +3.9%), 4-thread (3,616 vs 3,389, +6.7%), and single-thread (1,015 vs 899, +12.9%) tests.

The i7-13700H’s largest margin comes in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 103 versus 59 — a 74.6% lead. PassMark physics shows a similar gap at 72.7% (1,725 vs 999). These results indicate a significant advantage in integer-heavy, branch-predictive workloads. Floating-point math also favors Intel substantially: 66,322 versus 51,296, a 29.3% delta. In PassMark multithread, the i7-13700H leads 26,399 to 24,419 (+8.1%), and in PassMark single-thread it wins 3,594 to 3,283 (+9.5%).

AMD’s four wins are narrower but revealing. The Ryzen 7 5700G takes 3DMark 8-thread with 5,648 versus 5,369 (-4.9% for Intel). In PassMark data compression, AMD scores 318,262 versus 307,791, a 3.3% edge. Data encryption goes to AMD by 11.6% (20,325 vs 17,971). The largest AMD win is extended instructions: 21,847 versus 18,303, a 16.2% margin. These results suggest the Ryzen 7 5700G has specific strengths in cryptographic and SIMD-style workloads, even while losing the broader compute tests.

The overall average benchmark scores are close — 27,355 for Intel versus 27,051 for AMD — but the distribution matters. Intel’s wins are often large (10-70%), while AMD’s wins are mostly single-digit, with one exception at 16.2%. Both CPUs sit at the 79th percentile among all processors, yet the Intel part’s average score is 1.1% higher.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13700H is the clear choice for multi-threaded productivity and content creation. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,231 (not directly compared here but present in its benchmark list) reinforces the R23 result. The 20.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 18.5% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core (2,496 vs 2,107) indicate that long-running render or compile jobs will finish noticeably faster on Intel. The 29.3% advantage in floating-point math makes it better suited for scientific computing, financial modeling, or any workload relying on FPU throughput.

For single-threaded responsiveness, the i7-13700H also wins. Its 24.2% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 12.9% lead in 3DMark single-thread mean that everyday applications, web browsing, and legacy software that cannot use many cores will feel snappier. The 10.8% win in 3DMark 2-thread (1,947 vs 1,758) further supports this for lightly threaded tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G has a narrower but real niche. Its 16.2% lead in PassMark extended instructions (21,847 vs 18,303) points to a strength in AVX2-heavy or multimedia workloads. The 11.6% edge in data encryption (20,325 vs 17,971) makes it the better option for cryptographic operations, VPN throughput, or disk encryption. The 3.3% win in data compression (318,262 vs 307,791) suggests slightly better archive handling. Its 3DMark 8-thread win (5,648 vs 5,369) is curious — at exactly 8 threads, the Zen 3 architecture’s full-core performance without SMT contention appears competitive, but this advantage disappears at 16 threads (6,629 vs 6,885) and max threads (6,627 vs 7,502).

For gaming, the data is indirect but informative. The i7-13700H leads in 3DMark 16-thread (6,885 vs 6,629) and max-thread (7,502 vs 6,627), which are proxies for modern multi-core game engines. Its single-thread lead (1,015 vs 899, +12.9%) suggests better frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. AMD’s 8-thread win may benefit older games optimized for 8 cores/16 threads, but the Intel part’s higher boost clock (5.00 GHz vs 4.60 GHz) and superior single-core scores make it the stronger gaming candidate overall.

The Verdict

The data points unambiguously to the Intel Core i7-13700H as the higher-performing processor. It wins 17 of 21 tests, with an average benchmark score of 27,355 versus 27,051 for AMD. The margins are often substantial: 20.6% in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 24.2% in single-core, 29.3% in floating-point math, and 74.6% in prime number finding. Anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput — video editors, 3D artists, software developers, data analysts — should choose the i7-13700H. Its 14 cores and 20 threads (versus 8 cores and 16 threads on AMD) provide a structural advantage in parallel workloads that the benchmark results confirm.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is the right pick only for specific, narrow use cases. If the workload is dominated by encryption (11.6% faster), extended instruction sets (16.2% faster), or data compression (3.3% faster), the AMD part holds a measurable edge. Its 3DMark 8-thread win (5,648 vs 5,369) also makes it competitive for certain game engines that scale to exactly 8 threads. However, these wins are exceptions, not the rule. The AMD part’s lower single-thread scores (899 vs 1,015 in 3DMark, 3,283 vs 3,594 in PassMark) and its 20.6% deficit in Cinebench R23 multi-core mean it cannot match Intel in general-purpose or heavily threaded work.

The i7-13700H also carries a launch MSRP of $502, which may be relevant for system budgeting, though the Ryzen 7 5700G has no listed launch MSRP in the data. The Intel part’s 79th percentile ranking matches AMD’s, but the average score differential (1.1%) favors Intel. For most buyers, the verdict is straightforward: the i7-13700H is the superior processor, and the Ryzen 7 5700G is a specialized alternative for encryption and SIMD-heavy tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H wins all single-thread tests. It scores 1,856 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 1,494 for AMD (24.2% higher), and 3,594 in PassMark single-thread versus 3,283 (9.5% higher).

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G better at any compute task?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 5700G wins four tests: 3DMark 8-thread (5,648 vs 5,369), PassMark data compression (318,262 vs 307,791), data encryption (20,325 vs 17,971), and extended instructions (21,847 vs 18,303). Its largest win is 16.2% in extended instructions.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G has 8 cores and 16 threads. This contributes to Intel’s 20.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Q: Which processor is better for gaming?

A: Based on benchmark data, the Intel Core i7-13700H is stronger. It leads in 3DMark 16-thread (6,885 vs 6,629), max-thread (7,502 vs 6,627), and single-thread (1,015 vs 899) tests. The AMD part wins only the 8-thread test (5,648 vs 5,369).

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700H has an average benchmark score of 27,355, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27,051. Both rank at the 79th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any advantage in memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G supports a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is provided for the Intel part. Both support dual-channel memory, but AMD is limited to DDR4, whereas Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i7-13700H is built on Raptor Lake-H architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G uses Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Cezanne) on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 8 cores and 16 threads in a monolithic design. The Intel part’s hybrid architecture explains its multi-thread advantage: more total cores (14 vs 8) and more threads (20 vs 16) give it a structural edge in parallel workloads.

Cache hierarchies differ markedly. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of L3. Intel’s larger L2 per core (2 MB vs 512 KB) and L3 (24 MB vs 16 MB) likely contribute to its 29.3% lead in floating-point math and 74.6% lead in prime number finding, where cache residency matters. AMD’s smaller L3 is offset by its 7 nm process efficiency, but the benchmark data shows Intel’s cache strategy pays off.

Memory support diverges. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD is DDR4-only. Both use dual-channel memory buses. AMD lists a specific memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s; Intel provides no bandwidth figure. AMD’s PCIe implementation is Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This means the Intel platform has access to newer PCIe bandwidth for future devices, though at fewer lanes.

Integrated graphics differ. Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units; AMD uses Radeon Vega 8. No direct graphics benchmarks are provided in the data, so relative iGPU performance cannot be quantified. However, the AMD part is a desktop processor (Socket AM4, 65W TDP) while Intel is mobile (BGA 1744, 45W TDP). Intel’s lower TDP (45W vs 65W) is notable given its higher performance, suggesting better performance-per-watt in the tested workloads.

Physical characteristics also differ. AMD’s die is 180 mm² with 10,700 million transistors; Intel does not list transistor count or die size in the data. AMD’s process node is 7 nm (TSMC), while Intel uses 10 nm (Intel foundry). The AMD part is unlocked (multiplier unlocked: true), allowing overclocking, while Intel’s multiplier is locked. AMD’s socket is AM4, which has broad motherboard compatibility; Intel uses BGA 1744, which is soldered and not upgradeable. Release dates show Intel launched on 2023-01-03, while AMD launched on 2021-04-12, a 21-month gap that explains Intel’s architectural advantages.