CPU Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
Xeon E-2244G
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Intel Xeon E-2244G
The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS and Intel Xeon E-2244G represent two fundamentally different approaches to computing, one optimized for mobile efficiency and the other for workstation reliability. Benchmark data shows a clear split in their performance profiles, with the AMD part dominating multi-threaded workloads while the Intel chip takes a narrow lead in single-threaded tasks. Their average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the Ryzen 7 4800HS averaging 2557 and the Xeon E-2244G averaging 2527, placing both at the 49th percentile among all CPUs.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The most dramatic difference appears in multi-core performance. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS scores 1700.5 against the Intel Xeon E-2244G's 818, a 107.9% advantage. This is not a marginal win but a complete rout, with the AMD processor delivering more than double the rendering performance. The Geekbench multi-core test tells a similar story, with the Ryzen 7 4800HS scoring 7019 versus 4712 for the Xeon E-2244G, a 49% lead. The 8-core/16-thread configuration of the AMD chip simply overwhelms the 4-core/8-thread Intel part in any workload that scales with core count.
Single-core performance flips the narrative, though less dramatically. The Xeon E-2244G scores 1408 in Geekbench single-core, edging out the Ryzen 7 4800HS's 1320, a 6.2% advantage. This result reflects the Intel chip's higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz compared to the AMD part's 4.20 GHz. Interestingly, in Cinebench R15 single-core, the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS wins 186.5 to 115, a 62.2% margin. The discrepancy between the two single-core tests is noteworthy, suggesting the Cinebench R15 workload favors the AMD architecture's efficiency, while Geekbench's single-threaded test rewards the Intel chip's higher frequency.
The overall benchmark tally favors the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, which wins 3 out of 4 head-to-head comparisons. However, the Xeon E-2244G's single-core Geekbench victory indicates it still has relevance for lightly-threaded applications. The data shows a classic multi-core versus single-core tradeoff, with the AMD chip's thread count advantage proving decisive in parallel workloads and the Intel chip's clock speed advantage in sequential tasks.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different generations and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS uses the Zen 2 architecture on a 7 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G uses the Coffee Lake architecture on a 14 nm process node from Intel. This process node difference is significant, with the AMD chip being built on a more advanced manufacturing technology that enables higher transistor density.
The transistor and die size figures highlight this technological gap. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS contains 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G's transistor count is not listed but its die size is smaller at 126 mm². The AMD chip's higher transistor count on a larger die reflects its 8-core design versus the Intel part's 4-core configuration.
Cache hierarchy also differs between the two. Both share 8 MB of L3 cache, but the L2 cache differs: the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has 512 KB per core, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G has 256 KB per core. L1 cache is identical at 64 KB per core. The AMD chip's larger per-core L2 cache likely contributes to its strong multi-core performance in cache-sensitive workloads.
Memory support shows another distinction. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS supports both DDR4 and LPDDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G supports only DDR4 with a lower bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Intel Xeon E-2244G, a feature critical for server and workstation reliability, while the AMD mobile part omits it.
The integrated graphics differ as well, with the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS featuring Radeon Graphics 448SP and the Intel Xeon E-2244G featuring HD Graphics P630. PCIe support is Gen 3 for both, though the Intel part specifies 16 lanes from the CPU only. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket FP6, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1151, reflecting their different market segments: mobile versus server/workstation.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS dominates in multi-threaded workloads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads give it a massive parallel processing advantage, evidenced by the 107.9% Cinebench R15 multi-core lead and 49% Geekbench multi-core lead. This makes it the clear choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, software compilation, and any professional application that can utilize multiple threads. The 7 nm process and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth further enhance its throughput capabilities.
The Intel Xeon E-2244G wins in single-threaded performance where its 4.80 GHz boost clock shines. The 6.2% Geekbench single-core advantage makes it suitable for legacy applications, certain database workloads, and tasks that rely heavily on per-core performance. Its ECC memory support is a decisive factor for mission-critical systems where data integrity is paramount, and the 71W TDP, while higher than the AMD part's 45W, is acceptable for workstation environments.
The production status also differentiates their use cases. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is listed as Active, indicating ongoing availability, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G is End-of-life. For new system builds, the AMD part offers a future-proofing advantage. The AMD chip's mobile market segment suggests it is designed for laptops and compact systems, while the Intel part targets server and workstation platforms, which may influence system-level design choices beyond raw performance.
Specification Differences
The core and thread counts differ significantly: the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G has 4 cores and 8 threads. Clock speeds also vary, with the AMD chip running at 2.90 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost, while the Intel chip runs at 3.80 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. The TDP differs substantially, with the AMD part rated at 45W and the Intel part at 71W.
Process node and foundry are distinct: the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS uses 7 nm TSMC technology, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G uses 14 nm from Intel. The AMD chip has 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, while the Intel chip's die is 126 mm² with no listed transistor count. L2 cache per core is 512 KB for AMD versus 256 KB for Intel, with shared L3 cache of 8 MB for both.
Memory support differs, with AMD supporting DDR4 and LPDDR4 while Intel supports only DDR4. Memory bandwidth is higher for AMD at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory support is present only on the Intel Xeon E-2244G. Integrated graphics differ, with AMD featuring Radeon Graphics 448SP and Intel featuring HD Graphics P630.
The release dates show the AMD part launched on 2020-01-05, while the Intel part launched on 2019-05-28. The Intel Xeon E-2244G has a launch MSRP of $272, while the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has no listed launch MSRP. Market segments differ, with AMD targeting mobile and Intel targeting server/workstation. Production status shows AMD as Active and Intel as End-of-life. The AMD part's part number is 100-000000098, while the Intel part's is SRFAY.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G has 4 cores and 8 threads, giving the AMD chip a 2x advantage in both metrics.
Q: What is the single-core performance difference in Geekbench?
A: The Intel Xeon E-2244G scores 1408 in Geekbench single-core, which is 6.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS's score of 1320, making Intel the winner in that specific test.
Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2244G support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the Intel Xeon E-2244G supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS does not, making the Intel part more suitable for reliability-critical server workloads.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is higher than the Intel Xeon E-2244G's 42.7 GB/s, with both using dual-channel memory buses.
Q: Which processor has a smaller process node?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is built on a 7 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G uses a 14 nm process from Intel, making the AMD chip significantly more advanced in manufacturing technology.
Q: What is the production status of each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is listed as Active production, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G is End-of-life, meaning the AMD part remains available while the Intel part has been discontinued.