CPU Comparison

The Intel Xeon E-2174G and AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS occupy different corners of the processor market, yet their benchmark averages place them within a single percentage point of each other. The Xeon E-2174G is a 4-core, 8-thread Coffee Lake workstation part with a 71 W TDP, while the Ryzen 7 4800HS is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 2 mobile processor with a 45 W TDP. The data shows a clear split: the AMD chip dominates multi-threaded workloads, while the Intel chip wins the single-core Geekbench test, making the choice highly dependent on the intended application.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, double the Intel Xeon E-2174G's 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How do the two compare in multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS wins all three multi-core benchmarks in the head-to-head data, with a 52.1% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core, a 27.3% lead in Geekbench multi-core, and a 108.5% advantage in Cinebench R15 multi-core score (1700.5 vs 815).

Q: Which chip wins in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2174G wins the Geekbench single-core test with a score of 1559 against 1320 for the AMD, a 18.1% advantage. However, the AMD wins the Cinebench R15 single-core test (186.5 vs 114, a 38.9% lead).

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2174G has a TDP of 71 W, while the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has a TDP of 45 W, making the AMD chip more power-efficient on paper.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Xeon E-2174G supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS does not.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2174G is built on a 14 nm process by Intel, while the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS uses a 7 nm process from TSMC.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial. The Intel Xeon E-2174G uses the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Coffee Lake-S WS codename, and is part of the Xeon E-2100 series. It is built on Intel's 14 nm process node with a die size of 126 mm². The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is based on Zen 2 with the Renoir codename, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm node with a die size of 156 mm² and 9,800 million transistors.

Core configuration differs fundamentally: the Xeon offers 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen doubles that to 8 cores and 16 threads. Cache hierarchies show a similar split. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 8 MB of shared L3 cache, but the L2 cache differs, the Intel has 256 KB per core, while the AMD has 512 KB per core. The integrated graphics also diverge: the Xeon uses HD Graphics P630, while the Ryzen features Radeon Graphics with 448 SP.

Market positioning separates them further. The Intel chip is a server/workstation part with an end-of-life production status, launched in July 2018, and supports ECC memory. The AMD chip is a mobile processor, still active in production, launched in January 2020, and does not support ECC. The Xeon uses Intel Socket 1151 with PCIe Gen 3 and 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ryzen uses AMD Socket FP6 with PCIe Gen 3. Memory support shows the Xeon limited to DDR4, whereas the Ryzen supports both DDR4 and LPDDR4, with the AMD offering higher memory bandwidth at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a pronounced split in performance characteristics. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS wins three of the four head-to-head tests, with its largest margin coming in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it scores 1700.5 against the Intel's 815, a 52.1% difference. This result is consistent with the core-count advantage, as the AMD chip processes twice the threads.

In Geekbench multi-core, the Ryzen 7 4800HS posts 7019 versus 5104 for the Xeon E-2174G, a 27.3% lead. This margin, while significant, is smaller than the Cinebench R15 result, suggesting that the Geekbench workload scales less perfectly with additional cores. The Cinebench R15 single-core test also favors the AMD, with scores of 186.5 versus 114, a 38.9% difference, indicating that the Zen 2 architecture holds a per-core advantage in this specific workload.

The sole Intel victory comes in Geekbench single-core, where the Xeon E-2174G scores 1559 against 1320 for the Ryzen, an 18.1% lead. This result is notable because it contradicts the Cinebench R15 single-core outcome, highlighting how different benchmark suites can produce divergent rankings for the same hardware. The Intel's high boost clock of 4.70 GHz likely contributes to this win, while the AMD's lower 4.20 GHz boost clock and higher core count may work against it in lightly threaded Geekbench tests.

Overall, the head-to-head tally shows 3 wins for the AMD and 1 for the Intel. The average benchmark scores tell a different story, however: the Xeon E-2174G has an average benchmark score of 2588, while the Ryzen 7 4800HS averages 2557. Both chips sit at the 49th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival data for the Intel includes the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS with a 0.6% higher average score, while the Ryzen 7 4800HS's rivals include the same Ryzen 9 4900HS at 0.6% higher, placing both chips in similar competitive territory.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets for these two processors diverge on nearly every major field. The Intel Xeon E-2174G has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ significantly: the Intel runs at 3.80 GHz, the AMD at 2.90 GHz. Boost clocks show the Intel at 4.70 GHz and the AMD at 4.20 GHz. TDP reverses the clock relationship, with the Intel at 71 W and the AMD at a lower 45 W.

Process technology separates them: the Intel uses a 14 nm node from its own foundry, while the AMD uses a 7 nm node from TSMC. The Intel die measures 126 mm², the AMD die measures 156 mm². Transistor counts are not listed for the Intel, but the AMD has 9,800 million transistors. L2 cache differs per core: 256 KB for the Intel versus 512 KB for the AMD. L1 and L3 caches are identical at 64 KB per core and 8 MB shared, respectively.

Memory support shows the Intel limited to DDR4, while the AMD supports DDR4 and LPDDR4. Memory bandwidth favors the AMD at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Intel. Integrated graphics differ: HD Graphics P630 on the Intel, Radeon Graphics 448SP on the AMD. The Intel uses Socket 1151 with 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD uses Socket FP6 with PCIe Gen 3. Production status places the Intel as end-of-life and the AMD as active. The Intel has a launch MSRP of $334; no launch MSRP is available for the AMD.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is the stronger processor for multi-threaded workloads, winning all three multi-core tests by margins ranging from 27.3% to 52.1%. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration, larger L2 cache, and higher memory bandwidth give it a structural advantage in parallel tasks. The Intel Xeon E-2174G, despite its higher clock speeds and 18.1% win in Geekbench single-core, cannot overcome the core-count deficit in most modern workloads.

The Xeon E-2174G retains relevance for specific use cases. Its ECC memory support and server/workstation market segment make it suitable for reliability-focused environments, and its 4.70 GHz boost clock delivers competitive single-thread performance in Geekbench. However, the Ryzen 7 4800HS offers superior multi-core performance at a lower TDP, which is rare combination. For users prioritizing thread-heavy applications, the AMD chip is the clear choice. For users requiring ECC memory or maximal single-thread Geekbench scores, the Intel chip holds a narrow edge.

The average benchmark scores, 2588 for the Intel and 2557 for the AMD, show both processors performing within 1.2% of each other on aggregate, which places them at the same 49th percentile. This parity in averages masks the divergent workload profiles, meaning the right choice depends entirely on whether the target applications are multi-threaded or single-threaded.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS wins in: Multi-core rendering, as shown by the 52.1% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core. General multi-threaded productivity, evidenced by the 27.3% lead in Geekbench multi-core. Single-core Cinebench R15 performance, where it leads by 38.9%. Power efficiency, with a 45 W TDP versus 71 W. Memory bandwidth, with 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s. LPDDR4 memory support, which the Intel lacks. The 7 nm process node and higher transistor count.

Intel Xeon E-2174G wins in: Geekbench single-core performance, with an 18.1% lead. ECC memory support, which is absent on the AMD. Server/workstation market segment targeting. PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Higher base and boost clocks (3.80 GHz and 4.70 GHz versus 2.90 GHz and 4.20 GHz). The 126 mm² die size, which is smaller than the AMD's 156 mm². Its end-of-life status may appeal to users seeking legacy compatibility, while the AMD's active production status suits new builds.