AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Intel Core i3-12100TE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
Core i3-12100TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Intel Core i3-12100TE
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows a decisive advantage for the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS in the two shared benchmark tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD part scores 1700.5 against 862 for the Intel Core i3-12100TE, a delta of 97.3%. This is nearly double the multi-threaded output of the Intel chip. The gap narrows in single-core testing, but the AMD processor still leads by a substantial margin. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS records 186.5 versus 121 for the Intel Core i3-12100TE, a delta of 54.1%. The single-core lead, while smaller in percentage terms than the multi-core gap, remains significant given that the Intel part is built on a newer architecture.
The head-to-head comparison contains only two entries, and the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS wins both. The database records 2 wins for the AMD part and 0 for the Intel part. The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is 2557, while the Intel Core i3-12100TE averages 2475. That places the AMD part roughly 3.3% higher in the aggregate score across all recorded tests, though the margin is modest relative to the individual Cinebench R15 results. The AMD processor sits at the 49th percentile of all CPUs, and the Intel part also sits at the 49th percentile, meaning both occupy the same midpoint of the broader performance distribution.
Looking at the nearest rivals for each chip provides context. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon E5-4640 v3, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i3-10325, while trailing the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS by 0.6%. The Intel Core i3-12100TE is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon D-1540, 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i5-8600, and trails the Intel Core i5-9500T by 0.7% and the Intel Core i5-1155G7 by 0.9%. Both chips cluster tightly with their respective peer groups, but the AMD part's nearest rivals skew toward higher-core-count server and workstation chips, while the Intel part's rivals are mostly desktop mid-range processors.
The Cinebench R15 multi-core result is the clearest differentiator. A 97.3% advantage in that test indicates the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS delivers nearly twice the multi-threaded performance of the Intel Core i3-12100TE in this workload. The single-core result, while not as lopsided, still favors the AMD part by more than half. The Intel Core i3-12100TE has additional benchmark entries in the database for Cinebench R20 and R23, but those tests have no corresponding AMD scores, so they cannot be compared directly. The absence of overlapping data points limits the scope of the head-to-head analysis to the two Cinebench R15 tests.
The Verdict
From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is the stronger performer in every directly comparable benchmark. It wins both head-to-head tests, holds a higher average benchmark score, and does so with 8 cores and 16 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads on the Intel chip. The 97.3% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core is the single most important number in this comparison. It reflects the AMD part's core and thread advantage in a workload that scales with parallel resources.
The Intel Core i3-12100TE is not without its own merits. It has a lower TDP of 35 watts versus 45 watts for the AMD part, which suggests lower power draw under load, though the database does not record direct power consumption measurements. It also supports DDR5 memory, while the AMD part is limited to DDR4 and LPDDR4. The Intel chip has a larger L3 cache of 12 MB shared, compared to 8 MB shared on the AMD part, and a higher per-core L1 cache of 80 KB versus 64 KB. These architectural features could benefit certain workloads, but the benchmark data does not show the Intel chip winning any recorded test.
The verdict for most users is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS delivers superior measured performance in the shared benchmarks. The Intel Core i3-12100TE may appeal to those prioritizing lower power limits, newer memory support, or a desktop socket platform, but the performance data favors AMD. The percentile ranking ties at 49, so in the broader CPU landscape both chips land at the same relative position, but the direct comparison shows the AMD part ahead. The Intel chip is listed with a launch MSRP of $125, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS wins in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1700.5 versus 862 demonstrates a clear advantage in rendering, encoding, and other parallel tasks. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration is the likely driver of this result. The AMD part also wins in single-threaded performance according to the recorded Cinebench R15 single-core score of 186.5 versus 121, a 54.1% lead. This is notable because single-core performance is often considered an Intel strong suit, but the data does not support that assumption for this specific comparison.
The Intel Core i3-12100TE does not win any recorded benchmark. However, the data suggests areas where it may hold an advantage outside the measured tests. It supports DDR5 memory, which offers higher bandwidth potential, and it has a larger shared L3 cache of 12 MB. The Intel chip also has a lower TDP of 35 watts, which could translate to lower sustained power draw in thermally constrained environments. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform, whereas the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP6, a mobile platform. The Intel chip supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes on the CPU, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 3. These differences matter for system builders choosing a platform, but they are not reflected in the benchmark scores.
For users running Cinebench R15 or similar workloads, the AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is the clear pick. For users prioritizing DDR5 memory support, a desktop socket, or lower TDP, the Intel Core i3-12100TE offers those features, though with a measured performance deficit in the shared tests.
FAQ
Q: Which CPU has the higher multi-core benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS scores 1700.5 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, while the Intel Core i3-12100TE scores 862, a 97.3% difference in favor of AMD.
Q: Which CPU has the higher single-core benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS scores 186.5 in Cinebench R15 single-core, while the Intel Core i3-12100TE scores 121, a 54.1% difference in favor of AMD.
Q: How do the two CPUs compare in average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has an average benchmark score of 2557, and the Intel Core i3-12100TE has an average benchmark score of 2475. Both sit at the 49th percentile of all CPUs.
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each CPU?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i3-12100TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.
Q: What memory types does each CPU support?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS supports DDR4 and LPDDR4. The Intel Core i3-12100TE supports DDR4 and DDR5.
Q: What is the TDP of each CPU?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Core i3-12100TE has a TDP of 35 watts.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is built on the Zen 2 architecture with the codename Renoir, part of the 4000 series from AMD. It uses a 7 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. The die size is 156 mm² and the chip contains 9,800 million transistors. The cache layout consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The memory bus is dual-channel with a recorded bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, supporting DDR4 and LPDDR4 memory. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe is Gen 3. The integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics with 448 shader processors. The socket is AMD Socket FP6, and the market segment is mobile. The production status is active, with a release date of January 5, 2020. The multiplier is locked.
The Intel Core i3-12100TE is built on the Alder Lake architecture with the codename Alder Lake-S, part of the Core 12th Gen series from Intel. It uses a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The die size is 163 mm², no transistor count is recorded. The cache layout consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The memory bus is dual-channel, supporting DDR4 and DDR5, with no recorded memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe is Gen 5 with 20 lanes on the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the market segment is desktop. The production status is active. The multiplier is locked.
The fundamental architectural split is clear: AMD uses a 7 nm process with 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel uses a 10 nm process with 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD part has a smaller die at 156 mm² versus 163 mm², and the Intel part has a larger L3 cache at 12 MB versus 8 MB. The AMD part has a higher per-core L2 cache size of 512 KB, while the Intel part has a larger per-core L1 cache of 80 KB and a larger per-core L2 of 1.25 MB. The memory bandwidth is recorded only for the AMD part at 51.2 GB/s. PCIe generation favors Intel at Gen 5, while AMD uses Gen 3.
Specification Differences
The two CPUs differ across several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i3-12100TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The base clock for the AMD part is 2.90 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.20 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The TDP is 45 watts for the AMD part and 35 watts for the Intel part. The socket differs: AMD Socket FP6 for the AMD part, Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part. The process node is 7 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. The foundry is TSMC for AMD and Intel for the Intel part. The die size is 156 mm² for AMD and 163 mm² for Intel. Transistor count is 9,800 million for AMD and not recorded for Intel.
The cache hierarchy differs in both per-core and shared amounts. The AMD part has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR4 and LPDDR4, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 51.2 GB/s for AMD and not recorded for Intel. PCIe generation differs: AMD uses Gen 3, Intel uses Gen 5 with 20 lanes on the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: AMD has Radeon Graphics 448SP, Intel has UHD Graphics 730. The market segment differs: AMD is mobile, Intel is desktop. The release date is recorded for AMD as January 5, 2020, and is not recorded for Intel. The launch MSRP is not recorded for AMD and is $125 for Intel. The part number is recorded for AMD as 100-000000098 and is not recorded for Intel.