AMD Ryzen 7 3700U vs Intel Core i3-4360T Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U and the Intel Core i3-4360T are two processors from different eras and market segments, yet they land in a similar performance bracket. The data shows a clear divergence in their design philosophies: the Ryzen 7 is a mobile part built for efficiency with a high core count, while the Core i3 is a desktop chip with higher base clocks but fewer cores. This comparison reveals how architectural age and target platform dictate performance in ways that raw specifications alone do not capture.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U wins the only head-to-head benchmark available. The single multi-core test result shows the Ryzen 7 3700U scoring 672 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, against the Core i3-4360T’s 282. This is a decisive 138.3% advantage for the AMD part, indicating that workloads leveraging multiple threads heavily favor the Ryzen 7.

The Intel Core i3-4360T does not win any of the head-to-head benchmarks. However, the data includes additional benchmarks for the Intel part that are not listed for the AMD part. The Core i3-4360T has scores in Cinebench R20 and R23 tests, which the Ryzen 7 3700U lacks. This suggests that the Intel chip might be competitive in single-core performance, given its higher base clock of 3.20 GHz compared to the Ryzen’s 2.30 GHz base. Still, with no direct comparison in these tests, the only verified win belongs to the AMD processor.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U uses the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, manufactured on a 12 nm process by GlobalFoundries. It features 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. In contrast, the Intel Core i3-4360T uses the Haswell architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 22 nm process, with 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die. The process node difference is significant, with AMD’s 12 nm being more modern than Intel’s 22 nm.

The cache hierarchies also differ notably. The Ryzen 7 3700U has a larger L1 cache at 96 KB per core and L2 cache at 512 KB per core, while the Core i3-4360T has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core. Both share 4 MB of L3 cache. The AMD part also supports DDR4 memory, while the Intel part is limited to DDR3. Both use dual-channel memory buses and PCIe Gen 3. The integrated graphics differ as well: the Ryzen 7 features Radeon Vega 10, whereas the Core i3 has Intel HD 4600.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available is Cinebench R15 multi-core. Here, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U scores 672, while the Intel Core i3-4360T scores 282. This represents a 138.3% difference in favor of the AMD processor. The magnitude of this win is striking, suggesting that the Ryzen 7’s 4 cores and 8 threads provide a substantial advantage over the Intel’s 2 cores and 4 threads in this multi-threaded test.

The average benchmark scores are remarkably close, with the Ryzen 7 3700U at 968 and the Core i3-4360T at 963. This near-parity in average score, despite the massive difference in the Cinebench R15 result, implies that the Intel part has strengths in other areas that the data does not fully capture. The Intel chip’s higher base clock of 3.20 GHz likely contributes to competitive single-core performance, which is not directly measured in the head-to-head data. Both processors sit at the 26th percentile among all CPUs, reinforcing their similar overall standing despite their architectural differences.

Specification Differences

The most apparent differences lie in core configuration and power. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i3-4360T has 2 cores and 4 threads. The base clock differs, with the Intel part running at 3.20 GHz versus the AMD’s 2.30 GHz. The Ryzen 7 has a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, while the Core i3 has no listed boost clock. The TDP is a major differentiator: the Ryzen 7 is rated at 15 W, while the Core i3 is rated at 35 W, reflecting the former’s mobile design and the latter’s desktop orientation.

The sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP5 versus Intel Socket 1150. The memory support differs, with the Ryzen 7 using DDR4 and the Core i3 using DDR3. The process nodes are different, as are the transistor counts and die sizes. The release dates show a significant gap, with the Intel chip launching in July 2014 and the AMD chip in January 2019. The Intel part has no listed part number, while the AMD part is identified as YM370BC4T4MFG. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is significantly faster, scoring 672 in Cinebench R15 multi-core compared to the Intel Core i3-4360T’s 282, a 138.3% advantage.

Q: Do the two CPUs have the same overall performance level?

A: Their average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the Ryzen 7 3700U at 968 and the Core i3-4360T at 963. Both rank at the 26th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i3-4360T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Which processor is designed for mobile use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is a mobile processor with a 15 W TDP, while the Intel Core i3-4360T is a desktop processor with a 35 W TDP.

Q: How do their memory support types differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U supports DDR4 memory, while the Intel Core i3-4360T supports DDR3 memory. Both use dual-channel configurations.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the Intel Core i3-4360T has results that the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U lacks?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i3-4360T has results in Cinebench R20 multi-core (1175), R20 single-core (165), R23 multi-core (2799), and R23 single-core (395), which are not present for the AMD processor.

The Verdict

Benchmark results indicate that the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is the clear choice for multi-threaded workloads. Its 138.3% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core over the Intel Core i3-4360T shows that its 4-core/8-thread configuration is far more capable in parallel tasks. For users running modern applications that can utilize many threads, the Ryzen 7 3700U is the superior option.

The Intel Core i3-4360T, despite its age and lower core count, offers a higher base clock of 3.20 GHz, which likely provides solid single-core performance. However, the data does not include a direct single-core comparison between the two. The Intel part’s higher TDP of 35 W and desktop socket suggest it belongs in a stationary system, while the Ryzen 7 3700U’s 15 W TDP and mobile socket indicate it is meant for laptops. The near-identical average benchmark scores suggest that for general, lightly-threaded use, the two might perform similarly, but the Ryzen 7 3700U’s architectural advantages and modern process node make it the more future-proof choice. The verdict is clear: the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U wins where it matters most, while the Intel Core i3-4360T remains a legacy option for older platforms.