AMD Ryzen 7 2700E vs Intel Core i9-10885H Comparison

The Intel Core i9-10885H and AMD Ryzen 7 2700E are both 8-core, 16-thread processors, yet they represent fundamentally different design philosophies and market segments. The Intel part is a mobile-focused, high-boost Comet Lake-H chip, while the AMD processor is a desktop Zen-based part with a higher base clock but a significantly lower boost ceiling. Benchmark results show a consistent, albeit narrow, performance advantage for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E across all six shared Cinebench tests, with the Intel i9-10885H trailing by margins of roughly 2.8% to 2.9% in every workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data from the head-to-head comparison is remarkably consistent. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E wins every single benchmark in the suite, though the margins are tight. In Cinebench R15, the AMD chip scores 1255 points in the multi-core test against the Intel’s 1219, a delta of -2.9%. The single-core test shows a similar story, with AMD’s 177 points edging out Intel’s 172 by -2.8%.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern holds. The Ryzen 7 2700E achieves 5232 points in multi-core, while the i9-10885H manages 5082, again a -2.9% difference. In single-core, the AMD part scores 738 versus Intel’s 717, a -2.8% gap. The most recent Cinebench R23 iteration continues the trend: the AMD processor posts 12458 points in multi-core to Intel’s 12102 (-2.9%), and 1758 in single-core to Intel’s 1708 (-2.8%).

The consistency of these deltas is striking. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E holds a near-identical advantage in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads across three generations of the Cinebench test. This suggests the performance difference is not workload-specific but rather a fundamental characteristic of the two CPUs under these test conditions. The Intel part’s higher boost clock of 5.30 GHz does not translate into a win against the AMD chip’s 4.00 GHz boost, indicating that other architectural factors, such as IPC efficiency, play a more significant role in these benchmarks.

The aggregate data confirms this picture. The Intel i9-10885H has an average benchmark score of 3651, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E averages 3603. Despite the AMD chip winning all six head-to-head tests, the Intel part holds a slightly higher average score. This is due to the inclusion of Geekbench tests in Intel’s benchmark list, where it scores 6764 in multi-core and 1447 in single-core; these tests are absent from the AMD processor’s benchmark data. When comparing only the shared Cinebench tests, the AMD chip is the clear victor.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E is the winner in all tested scenarios. It outperforms the Intel Core i9-10885H in every Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 workload, both single-core and multi-core. For users whose primary concern is raw rendering performance as measured by Cinebench, the AMD processor is the superior choice. The margins are consistent, hovering just under 3%, which is a meaningful, repeatable advantage.

The Intel Core i9-10885H, however, does not win any of the six head-to-head benchmark comparisons. Its wins are limited to the Geekbench tests, which are not shared with the AMD processor. In Geekbench multi-core, the Intel chip scores 6764, and in single-core, it scores 1447. These scores cannot be directly compared to the AMD part since the Ryzen 7 2700E has no Geekbench results in the data pack. Therefore, the only verifiable area where Intel holds an edge is in the broader average benchmark score, where its inclusion of Geekbench results lifts its average to 3651, versus AMD’s 3603.

The use-case split is therefore clear: for Cinebench-centric workloads, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E is the better performer. The Intel i9-10885H may have a place in systems where its specific feature set, such as integrated graphics or mobile form factor, is required, but its benchmark performance against the AMD chip is consistently lower. The Intel part’s higher TDP of 45 watts versus AMD’s 65 watts also suggests different platform constraints, but the data shows the lower-TDP Intel chip still loses in all shared tests.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E is the faster processor in every shared benchmark test. It wins all six Cinebench comparisons, with a consistent 2.8% to 2.9% advantage over the Intel Core i9-10885H. Users seeking maximum Cinebench performance should choose the AMD processor. The Intel chip offers no performance wins in the head-to-head data, and its only advantage is a higher average benchmark score that is skewed by non-comparable Geekbench results.

That said, the choice is not solely about raw speed. The Intel Core i9-10885H is a mobile processor with a 45-watt TDP, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E is a desktop part with a 65-watt TDP. The Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 630, whereas the AMD processor has no integrated graphics. The Intel part also supports a higher boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which may be advantageous in other, untested workloads. The AMD chip, however, has a higher base clock of 2.80 GHz versus Intel’s 2.40 GHz.

For a desktop user building a system where Cinebench performance is the priority, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E is the data-backed choice. For a mobile user needing a processor with integrated graphics and lower power consumption, the Intel Core i9-10885H is the only viable option of the two, despite its lower benchmark scores. The AMD part’s active production status versus Intel’s end-of-life status also suggests the Ryzen 7 2700E has a longer availability horizon.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most benchmarks in the head-to-head comparison?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E wins all six shared benchmarks, covering Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core tests.

Q: What is the largest performance margin between the two CPUs?

A: The largest margin is a -2.9% delta in favor of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E, seen in Cinebench R15 multi-core, R20 multi-core, and R23 multi-core tests.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-10885H have any benchmark wins?

A: In the head-to-head data, the Intel part has zero wins. It does have Geekbench scores of 6764 (multi-core) and 1447 (single-core), but these tests are not shared with the AMD processor.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i9-10885H has an average benchmark score of 3651, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E has an average of 3603. This is because Intel’s average includes Geekbench results, which AMD lacks.

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The Intel Core i9-10885H has a TDP of 45 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Which CPU has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i9-10885H includes UHD Graphics 630. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E does not have integrated graphics.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in architecture. The Intel Core i9-10885H uses the Comet Lake-H architecture, built on a 14 nm process node by Intel. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Its cache layout consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 206 mm². It uses the Intel BGA 1440 socket and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. It has 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only) and is an end-of-life product released in April 2020.

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E, in contrast, is based on the Zen architecture (specifically Zen+ Pinnacle Ridge), fabricated on a 12 nm process node by GlobalFoundries. It also has 8 cores and 16 threads, but with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. Its cache hierarchy is different, with 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and the same 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is slightly smaller at 192 mm², and it contains 4,800 million transistors. It uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory, though its memory bandwidth is not listed. It has no integrated graphics and is an active production part released in September 2018.

The architectural differences explain the benchmark results. The AMD chip’s higher base clock of 2.80 GHz versus Intel’s 2.40 GHz contributes to its lead in all tests, despite Intel’s much higher boost clock. The Zen architecture’s larger L2 cache (512 KB vs. 256 KB per core) also likely helps in sustained workloads. The Intel part’s 14 nm process node is older than the 12 nm node used by AMD, though both are mature technologies. The Intel chip’s advantage lies in its mobile-optimized design, lower TDP, and integrated graphics, while the AMD part offers a larger transistor count and a desktop-focused feature set.