AMD Ryzen 7 2700E vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825C Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E and AMD Ryzen 7 5825C are both 8-core, 16-thread processors, yet they represent two very different design philosophies from AMD. The 2700E is a desktop part from the 2000 series built on the older Zen architecture, while the 5825C is a mobile processor from the 5000 series leveraging the much newer Zen 3 design. Despite the generational gap, the benchmark data reveals a surprisingly close contest in raw compute performance, with the desktop chip maintaining a narrow but consistent lead across every single test in the Cinebench suite.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are remarkably one-sided in favor of the Ryzen 7 2700E, though the margins are razor-thin across the board. In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the 2700E scores 1255 against the 5825C’s 1247, a delta of just 0.6%. The single-core R15 test shows a slightly larger gap, with the 2700E scoring 177 versus 175, a 1.1% advantage. Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern holds: the 2700E posts a multicore score of 5232 compared to 5197 for the 5825C (0.7% delta), and a single-core score of 738 versus 733 (0.7% delta). The trend continues into the more demanding Cinebench R23 workload, where the 2700E achieves 12458 multicore and 1758 single-core, while the 5825C trails with 12376 and 1747, respectively—both margins sitting at 0.6% and 0.7%.

What makes these results striking is the context. The 5825C is built on a newer architecture, a smaller process node, and features a higher boost clock, yet it cannot overcome the 2700E’s lead in any benchmark. The largest win for the 2700E is a mere 1.1% in the R15 single-core test, which is well within typical run-to-run variance for most systems. The average benchmark score for the 2700E is 3603, while the 5825C sits at 3579, a difference of roughly 0.7%. Both processors occupy the 55th percentile among all CPUs, indicating they are essentially peers in the broader performance landscape. The nearest rivals for the 2700E include the Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 with an average score of 3608 (-0.1% delta) and the Intel Xeon E-2286G at 3610 (-0.2% delta), showing the 2700E is clustered tightly with those workstation parts. The 5825C’s nearest rival list is topped by the Intel Core i9-9980HK at 3577 (0.1% delta), with the 2700E itself appearing as the second closest rival at a -0.7% delta.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture: the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E is the outright winner in every benchmark measured, even if the margins are small. It wins all six head-to-head comparisons, with the largest advantage being 1.1% in the Cinebench R15 single-core test. For users prioritizing raw compute performance in a desktop environment, the 2700E is the logical choice. Its 65-watt TDP and AM4 socket make it a straightforward drop-in for standard desktop builds, and its consistent, albeit slight, edge across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 suggests it will hold up well in sustained multithreaded workloads.

On the other hand, the Ryzen 7 5825C is a mobile part with a 15-watt TDP, and its performance is remarkably close to the desktop chip despite consuming far less power. The data shows a maximum performance deficit of just 1.1%, which is negligible in real-world use. The 5825C also brings integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics, a feature the 2700E lacks entirely. For a compact or portable system where power efficiency and integrated graphics are paramount, the 5825C offers nearly the same compute capability as the 2700E while being far more energy-efficient. The choice between these two comes down to platform rather than performance: desktop users should pick the 2700E, while those needing a low-power mobile solution should choose the 5825C.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two chips is substantial. The Ryzen 7 2700E is built on the Zen architecture using a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with a die size of 192 mm² and 4,800 million transistors. The Ryzen 7 5825C, by contrast, employs the Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm process at TSMC, packing 10,700 million transistors into a smaller 180 mm² die. This is a significant generational leap in transistor density and efficiency. The 2700E has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, while the 5825C has a much lower base clock of 2000.00 MHz but a higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache hierarchies also differ: the 2700E offers 96 KB of L1 cache per core, whereas the 5825C has 64 KB per core; both share 512 KB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The 5825C is built on the Cezanne-U codename and features a dual-channel DDR4 memory bus with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the 2700E also supports dual-channel DDR4 but has no listed bandwidth figure. The 5825C includes PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only), and it comes with integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics; the 2700E has no integrated graphics and no listed PCIe configuration. The sockets are entirely different—AM4 for the 2700E and FP6 for the 5825C—meaning they are not interchangeable. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The 2700E was released on 2018-09-18, while the 5825C is a newer part from 2022-05-04. The 5825C also has a part number of 100-000000xxx, whereas the 2700E has none listed. These differences explain how the 5825C can nearly match the 2700E despite a much lower base clock and a 50-watt lower TDP, as the Zen 3 architecture’s efficiency gains are evident in the benchmark results.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E’s boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 2700E scores 12458 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the Ryzen 7 5825C scores 12376, giving the 2700E a 0.7% advantage.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics, while the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E does not list any integrated graphics.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E has a TDP of 65 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Are these CPUs compatible with the same motherboard socket?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 2700E uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses AMD Socket FP6.

Q: Which chip has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 2700E has an average benchmark score of 3603, compared to the Ryzen 7 5825C’s average score of 3579.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 2700E wins in every measured benchmark category, making it the superior choice for raw compute performance. Its largest victory is a 1.1% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core, and it maintains a 0.6% to 0.7% edge across all other tests. This makes it the better option for desktop workloads where consistent performance across both single-threaded and multithreaded tasks is the priority. The 2700E’s higher base clock of 2.80 GHz likely contributes to its edge in shorter, lightly threaded tasks, as seen in the R15 single-core result. For users building a desktop system on the AM4 platform, the 2700E is the clear winner based on this data.

The Ryzen 7 5825C, despite losing every benchmark, wins in the categories of power efficiency and platform integration. Its 15-watt TDP is a fraction of the 2700E’s 65-watt TDP, and it includes Radeon Vega 8 graphics, meaning a system built around it does not require a discrete GPU. The 5825C’s newer Zen 3 architecture and 7 nm process allow it to nearly match the 2700E’s performance while consuming significantly less power, making it the ideal choice for mobile or compact systems where thermal and power constraints are critical. Its higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz also indicates potential for burst performance in short workloads, even if the sustained results do not overtake the 2700E. The 5825C is the winner for energy-conscious builds, while the 2700E is the winner for pure performance on a desktop.