AMD Ryzen 7 1700X vs Intel Core i5-10200H Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is the clear performance winner in this matchup, taking 3 out of 4 head-to-head benchmark wins. Its 8 cores and 16 threads overwhelm the Intel Core i5-10200H in every multi-threaded test, with leads ranging from 26.6% to 55.5%. The Intel chip wins only in Geekbench single-core, where it posts a 22.5% advantage. For workloads that scale across cores, the Ryzen 7 1700X is the definitive choice. The Core i5-10200H remains competitive only for lightly threaded tasks, but its overall average benchmark score of 2154 versus 2094 for the Ryzen does not reflect the magnitude of the multi-core defeats. The data suggests the Ryzen 7 1700X should be selected for rendering, compilation, or any parallel workload, while the Intel chip is acceptable for basic single-thread responsiveness.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and target different market segments. The Intel Core i5-10200H is a mobile part built on the Comet Lake-H architecture, while the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is a desktop processor using the original Zen architecture. Both are fabricated on a 14 nm process, but Intel uses its own foundry while AMD relies on GlobalFoundries. The transistor counts differ substantially: the Ryzen 7 1700X packs 4,800 million transistors on a 213 mm² die, whereas the Intel chip has no transistor or die size data recorded.

Core and thread counts are the defining architectural gap. The Ryzen 7 1700X offers 8 cores and 16 threads, exactly double the 4 cores and 8 threads of the Core i5-10200H. Cache configurations reinforce this disparity. The AMD part has 96 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, plus a shared 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel part has 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 6 MB L3 cache. The Ryzen's larger cache hierarchy gives it a structural advantage in data-heavy workloads.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Intel Core i5-10200H has a 2.40 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.10 GHz, while the Ryzen 7 1700X runs at 3.40 GHz base and 3.80 GHz boost. The Intel chip's higher boost clock helps explain its single-core win. Power envelopes also differ sharply: the Intel mobile part is rated at 45 W TDP, while the AMD desktop chip draws 95 W. The Ryzen 7 1700X uses an AMD Socket AM4, supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel bus and 42.7 GB/s bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1440, supports both DDR3 and DDR4, matches the dual-channel bus with a slightly higher 46.9 GB/s bandwidth, and lacks ECC support. The Ryzen 7 1700X also has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core i5-10200H is locked. The Intel part includes integrated UHD Graphics, whereas the Ryzen 7 1700X has no integrated graphics. Both support PCIe Gen 3, though the AMD chip lists 16 lanes on the CPU only.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result appears in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the Ryzen 7 1700X scores 1537 against 684 for the Intel Core i5-10200H. That is a 55.5% deficit for Intel, reflecting the raw core-count advantage in a workload that scales almost linearly. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Ryzen still wins, scoring 154 versus 96, a 37.7% margin. This is notable because single-core performance usually favors higher clock speeds, and the Intel chip's 4.10 GHz boost did not overcome the Ryzen's architectural efficiency.

Geekbench results split the two processors. In Geekbench multi-core, the Ryzen 7 1700X scores 5584 versus 4096 for Intel, a 26.6% lead. However, in Geekbench single-core, the Intel Core i5-10200H reverses the trend with a score of 1347 against 1100, a 22.5% advantage. This single-core win is the only benchmark where Intel comes out ahead, and it aligns with the higher boost clock and the Comet Lake architecture's stronger single-thread performance.

The average benchmark scores place the two very close: the Intel chip averages 2154, the Ryzen averages 2094. The nearest rivals in the database confirm this tight grouping. The Core i5-10200H sits near the Intel Core i7-5950HQ with a 0.2% gap, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X with a 0.3% gap, the Intel Core i5-7640X with a 0.6% gap, and the Intel Core i5-9400T with a 0.9% gap. The Ryzen 7 1700X sits near the Intel Core i3-8350K with a 0.1% gap, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G with a 0.3% gap, the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 with a 0.4% gap, and the Intel Core i3-9350KF with a 0.6% gap. The 47th percentile for the Intel part and 46th percentile for the AMD part place both near the middle of the all-CPU distribution.

The Cinebench R20 and R23 results for the Intel chip provide additional context. The Core i5-10200H scores 2853 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 402 in single-core, then 6795 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 959 in single-core. The Ryzen 7 1700X has no recorded scores for those tests, so a direct comparison is unavailable. The existing data is sufficient to establish the multi-core hierarchy.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-10200H has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Does the Intel chip win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-10200H wins Geekbench single-core with a score of 1347 versus 1100 for the Ryzen 7 1700X, a 22.5% margin.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap in Cinebench R15?

A: The Ryzen 7 1700X scores 1537 versus 684 for the Intel Core i5-10200H, which means the Intel chip trails by 55.5%.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i5-10200H does not.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-10200H includes UHD Graphics. The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has no integrated graphics.

Q: Are these processors from the same market segment?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-10200H is a mobile processor, while the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is a desktop processor.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X dominates multi-threaded workloads. Its 55.5% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 26.6% lead in Geekbench multi-core make it the pick for video rendering, 3D modeling, software compilation, and any task that can use 16 threads. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 16 MB L3 cache is well suited to content creation and scientific computing. The Ryzen also wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 37.7%, which expands its territory beyond purely parallel applications. The unlocked multiplier is another advantage for users who intend to overclock, though clock behavior beyond the recorded base and boost figures is not measured here. The ECC memory support also makes the Ryzen 7 1700X appropriate for systems where data integrity is a priority.

The Intel Core i5-10200H wins only in Geekbench single-core, with a 22.5% advantage. This makes it the better choice for applications that are strictly single-threaded, such as older games, some office software, or lightly threaded legacy programs. The higher 4.10 GHz boost clock supports this strength. The 45 W TDP also makes it suitable for notebooks, where power consumption is a constraint. The integrated UHD Graphics provides a display output without a discrete GPU, which is a practical advantage for mobile systems. However, the Intel chip's 4-core, 8-thread configuration limits its ceiling in multi-threaded tasks, and the 6 MB L3 cache is small compared to the Ryzen's 16 MB.

The overall picture is one of specialization. The Ryzen 7 1700X is the general-purpose workhorse with broad multi-core dominance, while the Core i5-10200H is a niche single-core performer with mobile-specific features. The average benchmark scores suggest near parity in aggregate, but that masks the qualitative difference: the Ryzen wins big where it wins, and the Intel chip wins by a smaller margin in a narrower set of workloads.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification. The Intel Core i5-10200H has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.40 GHz for Intel and 3.40 GHz for AMD. Boost clocks are 4.10 GHz for Intel and 3.80 GHz for AMD. TDP ratings are 45 W for Intel and 95 W for AMD. Sockets are Intel BGA 1440 for the Core i5-10200H and AMD Socket AM4 for the Ryzen 7 1700X. The Intel part uses the Comet Lake architecture with the Comet Lake-H codename, while the AMD part uses Zen with the Summit Ridge codename. The Intel foundry is Intel for the Core i5-10200H and GlobalFoundries for the Ryzen 7 1700X. Transistor count is 4,800 million for the AMD chip with a 213 mm² die size, while the Intel chip has no recorded value. L1 cache is 64 KB per core for Intel and 96 KB per core for AMD. L2 cache is 256 KB per core for Intel and 512 KB per core for AMD. L3 cache is 6 MB shared for Intel and 16 MB shared for AMD. Memory support is DDR3 and DDR4 for Intel with dual-channel bus for AMD. Memory bandwidth is 46.9 GB/s for Intel and 42.7 GB/s for AMD. ECC memory is not supported by Intel but is supported by AMD. PCIe is Gen 3 for both, with 16 lanes on the CPU only listed for AMD. Integrated graphics is UHD Graphics for Intel and none for AMD. Market segment is Mobile for Intel and Desktop for AMD. The production status is Active for both. The release date for the Intel part is 2020-09-16T17:00:00.000Z and 2017-03-01T17:00:00.000Z for AMD. The launch MSRP for the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is $399. The multiplier is locked for the Intel Core i5-1700X. The launch MSRP is $399. The Ryzen 7 1700X part number is YD170XBCAEWOF, and the Core i5-10200H part number is SRK3X.