AMD Ryzen 7 160 vs Intel Core 7 251E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for this comparison is asymmetrical. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 has a complete set of PassMark benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 7 251E has no benchmark entries in the database. As a result, direct head-to-head score comparisons are not possible from the available measurements. The AMD Ryzen 7 160's average benchmark score is 37117, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 251E shows an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking, which reflects the absence of recorded performance data rather than an actual performance level.

For context on the AMD Ryzen 7 160, its nearest rivals in the database provide reference points. The Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112, a delta of 0 percent from the Ryzen 7 160. The Intel Core i7-13700 scores 37135, also a 0 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093, a 0.1 percent positive delta for the Ryzen 7 160. The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37161, a 0.1 percent negative delta. These figures indicate the Ryzen 7 160 sits in a tightly clustered performance band, within roughly 0.1 percent of each rival in average score.

The individual PassMark tests for the AMD Ryzen 7 160 show its strongest results in data compression at 242634, integer math at 81370, and random string sorting at 25981. Its multithread score is 12237, and its single-thread score is 3435. Other scores include data encryption at 15520, extended instructions at 16170, floating point math at 6673, physics at 793, and find prime numbers at 43. With no corresponding Intel Core 7 251E scores, the database cannot quantify any performance advantage in either direction.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear conclusion: benchmark-based selection between these two processors is impossible with the current records. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 has verified performance metrics, while the Intel Core 7 251E has none. Any decision must rely on other recorded fields, such as core counts, clock speeds, memory support, and platform features.

The AMD Ryzen 7 160 presents a complete performance profile, with an average score of 37117 and an 85th percentile ranking. The Intel Core 7 251E, with no benchmark scores, cannot be positioned against the Ryzen 7 160 in any performance hierarchy. The database shows the Intel part as active in production with a 50th percentile, but that percentile carries no performance weight without test data.

From the available specifications, the Intel Core 7 251E offers more cores (24 versus 8) and threads (32 versus 16), a higher boost clock (5.60 GHz versus 4.75 GHz), and larger caches (36 MB L3 versus 16 MB L3). The AMD Ryzen 7 160 counters with a higher base clock (2.70 GHz versus 2.10 GHz) and a smaller process node (6 nm versus 10 nm). These are architectural facts, not measured performance. The verdict from the data is that the Ryzen 7 160 is the only one of the two with benchmark evidence, so any performance claim for the Intel part remains unverified.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 160 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. Its die size is 210 mm². It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Radeon 680M. The socket is AMD Socket FP7, and the market segment is Mobile.

The Intel Core 7 251E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. Its die size is 257 mm². It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy is 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the market segment is Desktop.

The two differ in every major architectural category: process node (6 nm versus 10 nm), foundry (TSMC versus Intel), core count (8 versus 24), thread count (16 versus 32), base clock (2.70 GHz versus 2.10 GHz), boost clock (4.75 GHz versus 5.60 GHz), die size (210 mm² versus 257 mm²), L1 per core (64 KB versus 80 KB), L2 per core (512 KB versus 2 MB), L3 shared (16 MB versus 36 MB), memory support (DDR5 only versus DDR4 and DDR5), memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s), PCIe generation (Gen 4 versus Gen 5), PCIe lanes (20 versus 16), integrated graphics (Radeon 680M versus UHD Graphics 770), socket (FP7 versus 1700), and market segment (Mobile versus Desktop). The TDP also differs: 28 watts for the AMD part versus 65 watts for the Intel part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 160 has a boost clock of 4.75 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 160 supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core 7 251E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and the Intel Core 7 251E support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 160 is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 7 251E is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Q: What are the market segments for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 160 is a Mobile processor. The Intel Core 7 251E is a Desktop processor.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 7 160 wins in every benchmark category because it is the only processor with benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score of 37117 and 85th percentile ranking demonstrate verified performance across the PassMark suite. The Intel Core 7 251E has no benchmark entries, so it cannot claim a win in any measured test.

Based on non-benchmark specifications, each processor has advantages in specific areas. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 wins on base clock (2.70 GHz versus 2.10 GHz), power efficiency (28 W TDP versus 65 W TDP), smaller process node (6 nm versus 10 nm), and PCIe lane count for the CPU (20 lanes versus 16 lanes). The Intel Core 7 251E wins on core count (24 versus 8), thread count (32 versus 16), boost clock (5.60 GHz versus 4.75 GHz), L1 and L2 cache per core (80 KB versus 64 KB L1, 2 MB versus 512 KB L2), L3 cache (36 MB versus 16 MB), memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s), PCIe generation (Gen 5 versus Gen 4), memory flexibility (DDR4 and DDR5 versus DDR5 only), and larger die size (257 mm² versus 210 mm²).

For use cases, the AMD Ryzen 7 160 fits mobile platforms given its FP7 socket and 28 W TDP. The Intel Core 7 251E fits desktop platforms given its 1700 socket and 65 W TDP. The Intel part also offers the higher boost clock and more cores, which typically corresponds to higher multi-threaded capacity in the database's general pattern, though no direct score exists to confirm this. The AMD part offers a smaller process node and lower TDP, which typically corresponds to better efficiency per watt. The database records both as active in production, with the AMD part released on 2025-09-30 and the Intel part released on 2025-01-12.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two processors differ, based on the recorded data.

| Field | AMD Ryzen 7 160 | Intel Core 7 251E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 24 |

| Threads | 16 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.75 GHz | 5.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |

| Part Number | 100-000000991 (FP7r2) | SRQDUQ657 |

Both processors share these traits: ECC memory support, dual-channel memory bus, locked multiplier, and active production status. The Intel Core 7 251E has a recorded launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD Ryzen 7 160 has no launch MSRP in the database.