AMD Ryzen 7 160 vs Intel Arc G3 EXTREME Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Arc G3 EXTREME are both mobile processors that land in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, yet their benchmark profiles could not be more different. The data shows a clear split: the Intel part dominates nearly every workload category, while the AMD chip secures a single, but notable, victory in integer math. The Arc G3 EXTREME posts an average benchmark score of 36,699, slightly behind the Ryzen 7 160’s 37,117, but this aggregate figure hides the fact that Intel wins 10 of the 11 head-to-head comparisons. The Ryzen 7 160’s only win comes with a 14.3% lead in integer math, a result that highlights its strength in specific computational tasks. For most users, the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME is the clear performance choice based on the benchmark evidence, though the Ryzen chip’s efficiency and specific integer performance may appeal to a niche audience.

The Verdict

The data points to one primary conclusion: the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME is the superior processor for the vast majority of workloads. Its head-to-head record of 10 wins against 1 loss is decisive. The Intel part leads by 60.1% in multi-threaded performance, 92.3% in floating-point math, and 82.7% in prime number finding, making it the outright winner for compute-intensive tasks. The AMD Ryzen 7 160, despite having a slightly higher average benchmark score (37,117 vs. 36,699), only wins in integer math. This suggests that the Ryzen 7 160 is a specialized tool, while the Arc G3 EXTREME is a general-purpose powerhouse.

However, the Ryzen 7 160 should not be dismissed outright. Its 28W TDP is higher than the Intel’s 25W, but both are low-power mobile parts. The AMD chip’s lead in integer math by 14.3% (81,370 vs. 71,164) could be significant for specific enterprise or scientific applications that rely heavily on integer operations. Yet, for anyone who prioritizes overall speed, multi-core rendering, or single-thread responsiveness, the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME is the data-backed choice. The verdict is straightforward: pick the Intel part for general performance, and reserve the AMD chip for niche integer-heavy tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME wins in almost every measurable category, but its largest margins reveal its core strengths. The 92.3% lead in floating-point math (86,929 vs. 6,673) is staggering, indicating a massive advantage in scientific simulations, 3D rendering, and any workload that relies on non-integer calculations. The 82.7% lead in finding prime numbers (248 vs. 43) further confirms its dominance in algorithmic and cryptographic tasks. The 68.5% lead in physics calculations (2,515 vs. 793) points to superior simulation performance, likely benefiting gaming physics or engineering models. The 60.1% lead in multi-threaded performance (30,659 vs. 12,237) makes it the clear winner for video editing, compilation, and other parallel workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 160’s solitary win is in integer math, where it scores 81,370 against Intel’s 71,164, a 14.3% advantage. This is a meaningful result for database operations, financial calculations, and certain types of compression algorithms that are integer-bound. While the Intel part wins data compression overall by 21% (307,094 vs. 242,634), the Ryzen chip’s integer strength suggests it could excel in software that is not optimized for the newer Intel architecture. The data shows that the AMD chip is not a general-purpose winner, but it has a specific niche where it outperforms.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz. Its cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME, in contrast, is based on the Panther Lake codename with an Arc G3 generation label. It uses a more advanced 3 nm process from Intel’s own foundry, featuring 14 cores and 14 threads—a design that lacks simultaneous multi-threading. Its base clock is lower at 1.90 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 4.70 GHz. The cache structure is notably different: 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

These architectural differences explain the benchmark results. The Intel part’s higher core count (14 vs. 8) gives it a natural advantage in multi-threaded tasks, despite having no hyper-threading. The larger L2 and L3 caches (2.5 MB per core and 18 MB shared, respectively) likely contribute to its superior performance in data compression and encryption. The AMD chip’s smaller 6 nm process and lower core count are offset by its higher base clock (2.70 GHz vs. 1.90 GHz) and support for ECC memory. The Intel part uses LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, which is nearly double the AMD chip’s 76.8 GB/s for DDR5, explaining its lead in memory-sensitive benchmarks. The PCIe support also differs: AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with only 4 lanes.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-threaded benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME scores 30,659 in the PassMark multi-thread test, which is 60.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 160’s score of 12,237.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 160 win any benchmark against the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 160 wins the PassMark integer math test with a score of 81,370, which is 14.3% ahead of the Intel’s 71,164.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth specifications for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 160 supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME supports dual-channel LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 160 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, which is larger than the AMD Ryzen 7 160’s 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 160 is fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME is fabricated on a 3 nm process by Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data is dominated by Intel, but the margins vary widely. The largest disparity is in floating-point math, where the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME scores 86,929 compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 160’s 6,673, a staggering 92.3% difference. This is not a close contest; it represents a fundamental architectural advantage in how each chip handles decimal arithmetic. Similarly, in prime number finding, the Intel part scores 248 against the AMD’s 43, an 82.7% lead, suggesting the Intel chip’s integer and algorithmic pipeline is vastly more efficient for this task.

The multi-threaded test shows Intel leading 30,659 to 12,237, a 60.1% gap. This is expected given the Intel chip has 14 cores versus 8, but the margin is larger than the core count alone would suggest, indicating better scaling. The physics test also favors Intel heavily, with a score of 2,515 versus 793, a 68.5% lead. In single-thread performance, the Intel part scores 4,293 against 3,435, a 20% lead, showing that even in lightly-threaded tasks, the Intel architecture is faster. The AMD Ryzen 7 160’s only win is in integer math, where it scores 81,370 against 71,164, a 14.3% margin. This is a niche victory, but a clear one, and it prevents the Intel part from achieving a perfect sweep.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has 14 cores and 14 threads. The base clock speeds are 2.70 GHz for AMD and 1.90 GHz for Intel, but the boost clocks are similar at 4.75 GHz and 4.70 GHz, respectively. The TDPs are close, with AMD at 28W and Intel at 25W. The process nodes are distinct: 6 nm for AMD and 3 nm for Intel. Cache sizes vary significantly, with Intel having a larger L1 cache (192 KB per core vs. 64 KB) and L2 cache (2.5 MB per core vs. 512 KB), as well as a larger L3 cache (18 MB vs. 16 MB). Memory support differs, with AMD using DDR5 and Intel using LPDDR5X. The memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for AMD and 136.5 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory support is present on the AMD chip but not on the Intel chip. PCIe support differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes and Intel offering Gen 5 with 4 lanes. The integrated graphics are Radeon 680M for AMD and Arc B390 for Intel.