AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs Intel Core i9-10900K Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE

CORE STATE Phoenix2
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i9-10900K

CORE STATE Comet Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.7 Base / 5.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Comet Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,854
1,904
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
261
268
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,725
7,935
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,090
1,120
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,395
18,895
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,597
2,667
passmark_data_compression
248,675
375,336
passmark_data_encryption
14,163
7,796
passmark_extended_instructions
17,999
24,620
passmark_find_prime_numbers
83
63
passmark_floating_point_math
39,233
53,123
passmark_integer_math
63,045
85,404
passmark_multithread
21,502
22,452
passmark_physics
1,237
1,029
passmark_random_string_sorting
31,240
46,389
passmark_single_thread
3,909
3,113
passmark_singlethread
3,909
3,113
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
8,257
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
1,688
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
3,313
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
6,221
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
8,938
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
851
geekbench_multicore
N/A
10,583
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
1,711

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs Intel Core i9-10900K

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results paint a clear picture of two very different processors. The Intel Core i9-10900K wins 12 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, but the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE takes the remaining 5 with decisive margins in specific workloads.

Starting with the broad multi-threaded tests, the Intel chip holds a narrow but consistent lead across all Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i9-10900K scores 18,895 against the Ryzen's 18,395, a 2.6% advantage. That same 2.6% delta repeats in Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core tests, where Intel posts 1,904 versus 1,854 and 7,935 versus 7,725 respectively. The single-core Cinebench results follow the same pattern: Intel wins R23 single-core 2,667 to 2,597, again by 2.6%.

The PassMark test suite reveals where each processor excels. The Intel i9-10900K dominates in data compression, scoring 375,336 against the Ryzen's 248,675 — a massive 33.7% lead. Random string sorting shows a similar gap at 32.7%, with Intel at 46,389 versus 31,240. Integer math goes to Intel by 26.2% (85,404 vs 63,045), and floating-point math follows at 26.1% (53,123 vs 39,233). Extended instructions favor Intel by 26.9%, with scores of 24,620 and 17,999.

However, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE posts decisive wins in four specialized workloads. Data encryption shows the largest margin of any test: AMD scores 14,163 against Intel's 7,796, an 81.7% advantage. Prime number finding goes to AMD by 31.7% (83 vs 63), and physics calculations favor AMD by 20.2% (1,237 vs 1,029). The single-threaded PassMark test also goes to AMD by 25.6%, with scores of 3,909 versus 3,113.

The overall PassMark multithread score is close, with Intel ahead at 22,452 versus 21,502, a 4.2% margin. Yet the average benchmark scores tell a slightly different story: AMD's average is 28,054 against Intel's 27,872, placing the Ryzen in the 80th percentile versus Intel's 79th. The nearest rivals for AMD include the Intel Core i5-14500T at 28,065 (0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G at 28,032 (0.1% delta), while Intel's closest competitors include the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U at 27,887 (-0.1% delta) and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D at 27,896 (-0.1% delta).

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is generational. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC, built on the Phoenix2 codename. It packs 20,900 million transistors into a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core i9-10900K belongs to the Comet Lake generation, fabricated on Intel's 14 nm process with a larger 206 mm² die; transistor count is not listed.

Core configurations differ substantially. The AMD chip offers 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel processor provides 10 cores and 20 threads. Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both share 64 KB of L1 per core, but the Ryzen allocates 1 MB of L2 per core versus 256 KB per core for Intel. The i9-10900K compensates with 20 MB of shared L3 cache, exceeding the Ryzen's 16 MB shared L3.

Memory support marks a clear generational split. The AMD processor uses DDR5 memory with dual-channel support and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the Intel chip runs DDR4 with dual-channel support at 46.9 GB/s. The Ryzen also supports ECC memory; the Intel part does not. PCIe connectivity differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 across 14 lanes versus Intel's Gen 3 across 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics set these chips apart. The Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE features the Radeon 740M, while the i9-10900K includes UHD Graphics 630. The market segments differ: AMD targets Mobile while Intel is positioned for Desktop. The Intel processor is end-of-life; AMD's part remains active. The Ryzen's multiplier is locked, whereas Intel's is unlocked.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-10900K excels in throughput-oriented workloads that scale with core count and cache capacity. Its 10 cores and 20 threads drive victories in data compression, where the 33.7% lead is the largest among its wins. Random string sorting benefits similarly, with Intel ahead by 32.7%. Integer and floating-point math tasks favor Intel by roughly 26% each, suggesting strong raw compute for number-crunching applications. The extended instructions test also goes to Intel by 26.9%, indicating solid SIMD performance. Across all Cinebench versions — R15, R20, and R23 — Intel maintains a consistent 2.6% edge in both single-core and multi-core runs.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE wins where its architecture provides specific advantages. Data encryption stands out at 81.7% ahead, a remarkable margin that suggests hardware acceleration or more efficient cryptographic instruction handling. Prime number finding favors AMD by 31.7%, and physics calculations by 20.2%. The single-thread PassMark score goes to AMD by 25.6%, indicating superior per-core efficiency despite lower clock speeds on paper.

The workloads split cleanly: Intel for compression, sorting, and general math; AMD for encryption, prime number generation, physics, and single-threaded PassMark performance. The PassMark multithread test lands close, with Intel ahead by only 4.2%, despite its core advantage.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core PassMark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 3,909 in PassMark single-thread, which is 25.6% higher than the Intel Core i9-10900K's score of 3,113.

Q: How large is the data compression performance gap?

A: The Intel Core i9-10900K scores 375,336 in PassMark data compression, which is 33.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE's 248,675.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i9-10900K does not.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s with DDR5 support, while the Intel Core i9-10900K achieves 46.9 GB/s with DDR4.

Q: How do the processors compare in data encryption?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 14,163 in PassMark data encryption, which is 81.7% higher than the Intel Core i9-10900K's 7,796.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-10900K has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE | Intel Core i9-10900K |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Comet Lake |

| Codename | Phoenix2 | Comet Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 206 mm² |

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 3.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.30 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 125 W |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 46.9 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes | Gen 3, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | UHD Graphics 630 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2020-04-29 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $547 |

The Verdict

The data supports distinct use cases for each processor. The Intel Core i9-10900K is the choice for workloads that demand raw throughput in compression, sorting, and mathematical computation. Its 33.7% lead in data compression and 26%+ margins in integer and floating-point math make it suitable for data-heavy processing tasks. The 10-core, 20-thread configuration drives consistent wins across all Cinebench versions, albeit by modest 2.6% margins.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE wins on efficiency and specialized tasks. Its 81.7% lead in data encryption points to cryptographic workloads, while the 31.7% advantage in prime number finding and 20.2% in physics calculations suggest scientific and simulation applications. The 25.6% single-thread PassMark lead indicates stronger per-core performance, which benefits lightly threaded applications. The 35 W TDP versus Intel's 125 W, combined with DDR5 support and ECC memory, positions this chip for power-conscious or reliability-focused systems.

For users prioritizing encryption, single-threaded responsiveness, or memory bandwidth with ECC support, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is the data-backed choice. For those needing maximum multi-threaded throughput in compression, sorting, and math-heavy workloads, the Intel Core i9-10900K wins on benchmark results despite being end-of-life. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical — 28,054 for AMD versus 27,872 for Intel — but the workload profiles diverge sharply, so the correct pick depends entirely on the application mix.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 PRO 8500GE
i9-10900K
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.4
3.7 +8.8%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.3 +6.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.4
3.7 +8.8%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.3 +6.0%
Multiplier
34
37 +8.8%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
125 +257.1%
PL1
—
125 W
PL2
—
250 W
PPT
47 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Comet Lake
Codename
Phoenix2
Comet Lake
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))
Core i9 (Comet Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
14 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
—
Die Size
137 mm²
206 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
46.9 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1200
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
H410, B460, H470, Z490
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
3.1 GHz up to 3.7 GHz
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 740M
UHD Graphics 630
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
End-of-life
Launch Price
—
$547
Part Number
100-000001185
SRH91
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA1200
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Stealth
—
View Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE Details View Core i9-10900K Details