AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs Intel Core i5-13500T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results reveal a fascinating split between these two 35W processors. The Intel Core i5-13500T and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE each claim victories in different types of workloads, with the final tally showing AMD winning 9 tests to Intel's 8. This near-even split suggests the two chips are designed for different priorities.

The most dramatic divergence appears in the Cinebench R23 tests. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 18,395 in multi-core, a massive 40% lead over the Intel's 11,028. This is the single largest delta in the entire benchmark suite. The single-core R23 result tells a similar story: AMD leads with 2,597 against Intel's 1,754, a 32.5% advantage. These results indicate the Zen 4 architecture delivers substantially higher sustained performance in modern rendering workloads.

However, the older Cinebench R15 and R20 tests tell a different story. In R15 multi-core, the Intel edges ahead with 1,945 versus 1,854, a 4.9% win. In R20 multi-core, Intel again takes the lead at 8,011 against 7,725, a 3.7% margin. The R20 single-core test also favors Intel, with 1,130 versus 1,090, another 3.7% delta. This pattern suggests the Intel chip performs relatively better in the older benchmark versions, possibly due to different instruction scheduling or workload scaling characteristics.

The PassMark suite reveals where each processor excels in practical computing tasks. Intel dominates in floating-point math, scoring 61,640 against AMD's 39,233, a commanding 57.1% advantage. Integer math also goes Intel's way, with 84,427 versus 63,045, a 33.9% lead. Data compression and encryption both favor Intel, with 9.1% and 9.7% margins respectively. The multi-thread PassMark score shows Intel ahead at 22,654 versus 21,502, a 5.4% edge.

AMD fights back in several specialized PassMark tests. The extended instructions test goes to AMD with 17,999 versus 16,599, a 7.8% margin. Prime number finding favors AMD at 83 versus 73, a 12% advantage. Physics simulation goes AMD's way with 1,237 against 1,112, a 10.1% delta. Random string sorting also belongs to AMD, scoring 31,240 versus 28,893, a 7.5% win. The single-thread PassMark result shows AMD ahead at 3,909 versus 3,580, an 8.4% margin.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark comparisons overall?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE wins 9 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core i5-13500T wins 8 tests. This makes AMD the narrow overall victor in terms of total benchmark wins.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 18,395 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 40% higher than the Intel Core i5-13500T's score of 11,028. This is the largest performance gap in the entire comparison.

Q: What is the biggest advantage for the Intel processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500T shows its largest lead in PassMark floating-point math, scoring 61,640 against AMD's 39,233. This represents a 57.1% advantage, the biggest Intel win in any benchmark.

Q: Which chip performs better in single-threaded workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE leads in single-threaded tests. It scores 3,909 in PassMark single-thread versus Intel's 3,580, an 8.4% advantage. The Cinebench R23 single-core test shows AMD at 2,597 versus Intel's 1,754, a 32.5% lead.

Q: Are the two processors in the same performance percentile category?

A: Yes, both processors are at the 80th percentile when compared against all CPUs in the database. However, their average benchmark scores differ slightly, with Intel at 28,670 and AMD at 28,054.

Q: How do these chips compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500T sits within 0.4% of the Intel Core i5-12600, AMD EPYC 7203P, Intel Core 5 220H, and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-14500T (0% delta) and within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G and Intel Core i9-12900H.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture for different use cases. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is the superior choice for modern rendering workloads, particularly those that scale well with the Cinebench R23 benchmark. Its 40% multi-core advantage in R23 and 32.5% single-core lead indicate strong performance in current-generation applications that leverage recent instruction sets and threading models.

The Intel Core i5-13500T is better suited for legacy application compatibility and specific numerical workloads. Its 57.1% lead in floating-point math and 33.9% advantage in integer math suggest it handles traditional compute tasks with greater efficiency. The Intel chip also wins in data compression and encryption, making it suitable for database and security-related workloads.

For users running older software versions, the Intel chip's wins in Cinebench R15 and R20 could be significant. However, for anyone working with current-generation rendering tools, the AMD processor's R23 dominance is hard to ignore. The overall benchmark score difference is modest, with Intel at 28,670 and AMD at 28,054, a gap of roughly 2.2%. This places both chips in the same performance class despite their very different architectural approaches.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in their core configurations. The Intel Core i5-13500T features 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite having fewer than half the cores, the AMD chip achieves comparable or better performance in many tests, showing the efficiency of its architecture.

Clock speeds also differ substantially. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The AMD processor runs at a 3.40 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.00 GHz. The AMD chip's higher clocks contribute to its single-threaded advantages.

Both processors consume 35W of power, making them comparable in thermal design. However, they use different sockets: Intel uses Socket 1700, while AMD uses Socket AM5. Memory support differs as well, with Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, which Intel does not.

The AMD processor has a memory bandwidth rating of 83.2 GB/s, while the Intel chip's memory bandwidth is not specified in the database. PCIe support also differs, with Intel offering Gen 5 with 20 lanes and AMD providing Gen 4 with 14 lanes.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is significant. Intel uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, fabricated by Intel itself with a die size of 215 mm². AMD employs Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 137 mm² and 20,900 million transistors. The AMD chip's smaller, denser process node helps explain its efficiency advantage.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD offers 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip's larger cache allocations support its core-heavy design.

The integrated graphics solutions also differ. Intel includes UHD Graphics 770, while AMD uses Radeon 740M. The AMD chip's codename is Phoenix2, reflecting its mobile-oriented design despite being listed in the database as a mobile market segment product. Intel's codename is Raptor Lake-S, and it is classified as a desktop segment processor.

Release dates show a generational gap. The Intel chip launched on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $232. The AMD processor arrived later on April 15, 2024. This timing difference means the AMD chip benefits from more recent architectural refinements.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13500T wins in workloads that emphasize raw computational throughput across many cores. Its 57.1% advantage in floating-point math makes it the choice for scientific computing and financial modeling that rely heavily on floating-point operations. The 33.9% lead in integer math supports similar conclusions for integer-heavy applications like cryptography or database indexing. Data compression and encryption wins, at 9.1% and 9.7% respectively, position Intel favorably for file servers and secure communication workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE excels in modern rendering and physics simulation. The 40% multi-core and 32.5% single-core leads in Cinebench R23 suggest it is the better option for video rendering, 3D animation, and other contemporary creative workloads. The physics test win, with a 10.1% advantage, indicates stronger performance in simulation and game physics calculations. The 7.5% lead in random string sorting makes it suitable for text processing and data organization tasks.

For single-threaded responsiveness, the AMD chip's 8.4% PassMark single-thread advantage and 32.5% R23 single-core lead mean snappier application launches and better performance in lightly threaded software. The Intel chip counters with better performance in older benchmark versions, which could translate to better compatibility with legacy software that has not been optimized for newer architectures.

The overall pattern shows Intel winning in established, well-parallelized compute tasks, while AMD dominates in newer, more modern workloads that leverage recent architectural features and higher clock speeds. Users running current-generation software should prefer AMD, while those with legacy application stacks may find Intel more suitable.