AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE

CORE STATE Phoenix2
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 253PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,854
2,507
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
261
354
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,725
10,449
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,090
1,475
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,395
24,880
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,597
3,512
passmark_data_compression
248,675
339,133
passmark_data_encryption
14,163
18,385
passmark_extended_instructions
17,999
21,806
passmark_find_prime_numbers
83
138
passmark_floating_point_math
39,233
80,870
passmark_integer_math
63,045
114,158
passmark_multithread
21,502
29,271
passmark_physics
1,237
1,845
passmark_random_string_sorting
31,240
32,777
passmark_single_thread
3,909
3,955
passmark_singlethread
3,909
3,955

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs Intel Core 7 253PE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive picture: the Intel Core 7 253PE wins all 17 recorded head-to-head tests against the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE. The most lopsided result comes in PassMark floating point math, where Intel leads by 51.5%, posting 80,870 points against AMD's 39,233. Integer math also shows a substantial gap, with Intel scoring 114,158 versus 63,045, a 44.8% advantage. These two workloads highlight the Intel chip's dominance in raw arithmetic processing.

The Cinebench suite tells a consistent story across both multi-core and single-core tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 24,880 compared to AMD's 18,395, a 26.1% deficit for the Ryzen part. The single-core R23 result shows the same 26.1% gap, with Intel at 3,512 and AMD at 2,597. Older Cinebench versions mirror this pattern: R20 multi-core shows Intel at 10,449 versus AMD's 7,725 (26.1% difference), and R15 multi-core shows Intel at 2,507 against AMD's 1,854 (26% difference). Interestingly, the single-core deltas are nearly identical to multi-core ones across all three R15, R20, and R23 versions, suggesting the performance gap scales evenly across core counts rather than favoring either chip's core topology.

The PassMark multi-thread test shows Intel at 29,271 against AMD's 21,502, a 26.5% margin. Data compression follows a similar path, with Intel scoring 339,133 versus AMD's 248,675, a 26.7% edge. Encryption workloads narrow the gap somewhat: Intel's 18,385 beats AMD's 14,163 by 23%. Extended instructions see Intel ahead by 17.5% (21,806 vs. 17,999), while the physics test shows Intel leading 1,845 to 1,237, a 33% advantage.

The closest contests are in single-threaded workloads. PassMark single-thread shows Intel at 3,955 against AMD's 3,909, a margin of just 1.2%. Random string sorting is nearly as tight: Intel scores 32,777 versus AMD's 31,240, a 4.7% difference. The prime number search test is the most extreme outlier, with Intel's 138 beating AMD's 83 by 39.9%. These results indicate that while Intel wins everywhere, its advantage is primarily built on multi-core and math-heavy workloads; in lightly threaded or memory-latency-sensitive tasks, the two processors are much closer.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE does not win any of the 17 recorded benchmarks against the Intel Core 7 253PE. Its closest performance comes in single-threaded tests, where the 1.2% deficit in PassMark single-thread shows the Zen 4 core design is competitive at low thread counts. The random string sorting test, which often reflects memory access patterns and cache efficiency, also shows only a 4.7% gap. For workloads that are latency-bound or depend on single-core responsiveness, the AMD part loses by a small margin rather than a large one.

The Intel Core 7 253PE wins decisively in every other category. Its largest advantages appear in floating point math (51.5%), integer math (44.8%), and prime number generation (39.9%), all of which are compute-intensive and benefit from the Intel chip's higher core count and clock speeds. The 33% lead in the physics test reinforces this pattern. In Cinebench tests, the consistent 26.1% margin suggests that Intel's advantage holds uniformly whether the workload scales across all cores or uses just one. The data compression test, which often relies on both integer throughput and cache bandwidth, shows Intel ahead by 26.7%, aligning with the broader multi-core trend.

For real-world use cases, the data indicates that AMD's 8500GE is best suited to scenarios where single-threaded performance is the bottleneck, such as lightly threaded applications or interactive workloads. The Intel chip, by contrast, is the clear choice for rendering, scientific computing, data compression, and any workload that can exploit its 10 cores and 20 threads. The encryption test, where Intel leads by 23%, also favors the Intel part for security and virtualization tasks. The only category where the AMD chip avoids a double-digit loss is single-thread performance, and even there it trails.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses a Zen 4 architecture built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with a die size of 137 mm² and 20,900 million transistors. Its codename is Phoenix2, and it belongs to the 8000 series. The chip packs 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 35 watts, making it a low-power part. Cache is organized with 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support. The integrated GPU is a Radeon 740M. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes. It is built for the AMD Socket AM5 and is classified as a mobile market segment part.

The Intel Core 7 253PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It has 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its TDP is 65 watts, nearly double the AMD chip's. Cache consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a much larger 33 MB of shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. The integrated GPU is UHD Graphics 730. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a generational leap over AMD's Gen 4. It uses Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop market segment part. The release date for the Intel chip is later, and its launch MSRP is $384.

The core count difference is significant: Intel offers 67% more cores and 67% more threads. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock by 0.50 GHz, though its base clock is lower by 0.90 GHz. The larger L3 cache on Intel (33 MB vs. 16 MB) likely contributes to its advantage in cache-sensitive workloads like random string sorting. The process node difference (4 nm vs. 10 nm) explains the AMD chip's lower TDP, but the Intel chip compensates with higher raw performance at the cost of more power draw. The PCIe Gen 5 support on Intel provides double the bandwidth per lane compared to AMD's Gen 4. Both processors support ECC memory, a feature relevant for workstation and server use cases.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE reaches 5.00 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: Intel provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel has 67% more cores and threads.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The biggest margin is in PassMark floating point math, where Intel leads by 51.5% (80,870 vs. 39,233 points).

Q: Is there any benchmark where the AMD chip is close to Intel?

A: Yes, in PassMark single-thread, Intel leads by only 1.2% (3,955 vs. 3,909). Random string sorting also shows a narrow 4.7% gap.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel configurations.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: Intel has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, more than double AMD's 16 MB.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear hierarchy. The Intel Core 7 253PE outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE in every benchmark test in the database, with an average benchmark score of 40,557 compared to AMD's 28,054. The Intel chip sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while AMD sits at the 80th percentile. The Intel part's nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 223PE (average score 40,585, 0.1% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (average score 40,431, 0.3% lower), placing it in a competitive tier. The AMD chip's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14500T (average score 28,065, a 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (average score 28,032, 0.1% higher), showing it competes with lower-tier desktop and mobile parts.

For users prioritizing multi-threaded productivity, scientific computing, or memory-intensive tasks, the Intel Core 7 253PE is the stronger choice based on its 10 cores, 20 threads, larger 33 MB L3 cache, and higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Its 65 watt TDP and PCIe Gen 5 support further position it for desktop workloads that demand throughput. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE, with its 35 watt TDP and 4 nm process, is the more power-efficient option, but the data does not show any benchmark category where it beats Intel. Single-threaded performance is the closest contest, yet Intel still wins there. The AMD chip's market segment is mobile, while Intel's is desktop, so the comparison favors Intel for stationary systems. The Intel part also has a later release date and a launch MSRP of $384. For any workload represented in the database, the Intel Core 7 253PE delivers higher scores, and the AMD chip only narrows the gap in lightly threaded scenarios without ever taking the lead.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 PRO 8500GE
7 253PE
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.4
2.5 -26.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.5 +10.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.4
2.5 -26.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.5 +10.0%
Multiplier
34
25 -26.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
65 +85.7%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
PPT
47 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
—
Codename
Phoenix2
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
—
Die Size
137 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
3.1 GHz up to 3.7 GHz
—
P-Core Turbo
—
5.3 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 740M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$384
Part Number
100-000001185
SA4QE
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Stealth
—
View Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE Details View Core 7 253PE Details