AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and the Intel Core 3 201E represent two contrasting approaches to mainstream processing, one built on a modern high-efficiency node and the other on a more traditional desktop architecture. The benchmark data reveals a dominant performance advantage for the AMD processor across every single test, with deltas that range from moderate to massive.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has an average benchmark score of 28054, while the Intel Core 3 201E scores 19056.

Q: How do the two compare in the 80th and 73rd percentiles?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE ranks in the 80th percentile against all CPUs, whereas the Intel Core 3 201E sits in the 73rd percentile.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the largest single benchmark delta between them?

A: The largest delta is in Passmark Random String Sorting, where the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE leads by 75.7%.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and the Intel Core 3 201E support ECC memory.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 3 201E?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E has a launch MSRP of $134.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is significant, starting at the fabrication level. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, a modern node designed for high density and efficiency. In contrast, the Intel Core 3 201E uses Intel's 10 nm process, which is an older generation lithography. This node advantage directly impacts power efficiency, though the database does not provide wattage figures for direct comparison.

The CPU core configurations diverge sharply. AMD uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix2, with 6 physical cores and 12 threads via SMT. Intel uses the Bartlett Lake design, offering 4 cores and 8 threads. This 50% core-count advantage for AMD provides a fundamental throughput advantage in heavily parallel workloads. The cache hierarchies also differ: AMD supplies 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel provides a larger 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core, but only 12 MB of shared L3 cache, a configuration that yields lower total cache volume for the processor as a whole.

Memory support demonstrates another strategic difference. The AMD chip is restricted to DDR5 memory, operating on a dual-channel bus with a measured bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Intel offers flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though its dual-channel bus tops out at 76.8 GB/s. Each CPU integrates a graphics solution: AMD uses the Radeon 740M, while Intel equips the UHD Graphics 730. The PCIe implementation also varies, with Intel providing Gen 5 connectivity across 16 lanes from the CPU, versus AMD's Gen 4 interface with 14 lanes.

The physical platform requirements are incompatible. AMD uses Socket AM5, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD processor is classified under the mobile market segment, whereas Intel targets the desktop segment, despite both being active production parts. The transistor count for AMD is 20,900 million on a 137 mm² die, while Intel does not disclose transistor count for its 163 mm² die.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results show a clean sweep for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE, which wins all 17 recorded tests. No benchmark favors the Intel Core 3 201E.

The Cinebench suite illustrates AMD's commanding lead in both multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, AMD scores 18395 against Intel's 12613, a 45.8% advantage. Single-core in the same test shows AMD at 2597 versus Intel at 1780, a 45.9% delta. This pattern holds across every Cinebench version: R15 multi-core (1854 vs 1271, +45.9%), R15 single-core (261 vs 179, +45.8%), R20 multi-core (7725 vs 5297, +45.8%), and R20 single-core (1090 vs 747, +45.9%). The consistency of the delta across versions, all hovering near 45.9%, suggests a fundamental IPC plus core-count advantage that scales linearly with the workload.

The Passmark suite reveals an even wider spread in specialized tasks. The largest victory appears in random string sorting, where AMD scores 31240 against Intel's 17783, a 75.7% delta. Extended instructions processing shows AMD at 17999 versus 11035, a 63.1% gap. Data encryption yields 14163 for AMD against 8931 for Intel, a 58.6% lead, and data compression shows 248675 against 164160, a 51.5% difference. Integer math favors AMD by 43.6% (63045 vs 43894), and multi-thread performance shows a 44.9% advantage (21502 vs 14839). The prime numbers test, typically sensitive to memory latency and integer throughput, gives AMD 83 versus Intel's 57, a 45.6% margin.

Some margins are narrower. Floating point math shows AMD at 39233 versus Intel at 33260, an 18% lead. Single-thread performance in Passmark yields 3909 against 3482, a 12.3% advantage. Physics calculations are the closest contest, with AMD scoring 1237 and Intel scoring 1141, a modest 8.4% delta. Even AMD's smallest win remains decisive, indicating the Intel part cannot close the gap in any measured metric.

The Verdict

The data presents a straightforward analysis. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE outperforms the Intel Core 3 201E in every benchmark recorded by the database, with no counterbalancing victories for Intel. The AMD processor delivers 45.8% to 45.9% higher performance across all Cinebench tests, which represent standard rendering and general-purpose compute loads. In the Passmark suite, the delta varies from 8.4% to 75.7%, with AMD holding the lead in every case.

The Intel Core 3 201E occupies a lower performance tier. Its average benchmark score of 19056 places it 47.3% behind AMD's 28054. Its percentile rank of 73rd versus AMD's 80th confirms that it sits in a lower overall performance bracket when compared against the entire database of CPUs. The nearest rivals to the Intel chip include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and the Intel Core i5-12400F, both of which are demonstrably slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE.

Systems integrators or users who require maximum compute throughput from these two options will select the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE. The Intel Core 3 201E, with its 4-core 8-thread configuration and older 10 nm node, is clearly positioned in a lower performance class. The launch MSRP of the Intel part is $134, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the benchmark data shows no performance advantage that would recommend it over the AMD competitor for any workload measured.

Specification Differences

| Feature | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE | Intel Core 3 201E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 60 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Not specified |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 163 mm² |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not specified |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 12 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | Not specified | $134 |

| Part Number | 100-000001185 | SRVTR |