AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U vs Intel Core i9-10900TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U

CORE STATE Barcelo-R
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2000 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i9-10900TE

CORE STATE Comet Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1800 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Comet Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,210
1,213
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
170
171
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,044
5,058
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
711
714
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
12,010
12,045
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,695
1,700
geekbench_multicore
5,057
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
1,253
N/A

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U vs Intel Core i9-10900TE

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U and Intel Core i9-10900TE occupy different corners of the processor market: one is a 15-watt mobile part, the other a 35-watt desktop chip. Yet in the database's head-to-head Cinebench suite, they land almost exactly on top of each other. Intel wins all six recorded tests, but the largest margin is a 0.6% single-core gap. The data shows a near dead heat in raw rendering performance, with the decision coming down to platform features and power envelopes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded Cinebench results leave no ambiguity about the winner, but the margins are so thin they are effectively noise. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel Core i9-10900TE scores 1213 against the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U's 1210, a 0.2% lead. Single-core R15 sees 171 versus 170, a 0.6% gap. The R20 tests show 5058 against 5044 (0.3%) and 714 against 711 (0.4%). R23 multi-core is 12045 versus 12010 (0.3%), and single-core is 1700 versus 1695 (0.3%). Every one of these deltas falls within typical run-to-run variance for a benchmark suite. The data indicates that the two processors deliver essentially identical Cinebench performance, despite the Intel part having 10 cores to AMD's 6.

The database also records Geekbench results for the AMD part, with a multi-core score of 5057 and a single-core score of 1253. No comparable Geekbench data exists for the Intel part, so a direct comparison is not possible. However, the average benchmark score across all recorded tests tells a similar story: Intel's average is 3484, while AMD's is 3394. That difference is small, and both processors sit at the 54th percentile among all CPUs, confirming they occupy the same performance tier. The Intel part's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon D-1732TE (average 3486, 0% delta) and the Intel Xeon E-2246G (3492, -0.2%), while AMD's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I (3406, -0.4%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (3369, 0.8%). These surrounding scores reinforce the conclusion that neither chip has a meaningful performance advantage in the database's measurements.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-10900TE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Do both processors have the same boost clock?

A: Yes, both list a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The base clocks differ: AMD at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i9-10900TE does not.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel part has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD part has 16 MB.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U has a TDP of 15 watts, compared to 35 watts for the Intel Core i9-10900TE.

Q: Which processor is newer?

A: The AMD part was released on 2023-01-03, while the Intel part was released on 2020-04-29.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different design philosophies. AMD uses the Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm process from TSMC, packing 10,700 million transistors into a 180 mm² die. Intel's Comet Lake is built on a 14 nm process from Intel, with a 206 mm² die and no transistor count listed. The core layouts differ: AMD has 6 cores with 512 KB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel has 10 cores with 256 KB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. Both use DDR4 memory, but AMD's dual-channel interface delivers 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, while Intel's delivers 46.9 GB/s. AMD also includes ECC support, which Intel lacks. Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD's Radeon Graphics (Vega 7) versus Intel's UHD Graphics 630. The process node difference is significant: 7 nm versus 14 nm, which explains the AMD part's lower power envelope despite a smaller core count.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two parts: cores (6 vs 10), threads (12 vs 20), base clock (2.00 GHz vs 1.80 GHz), TDP (15W vs 35W), socket (AMD Socket FP6 vs Intel Socket 1200), architecture (Zen 3 vs Comet Lake), process node (7 nm vs 14 nm), foundry (TSMC vs Intel), die size (180 mm² vs 206 mm²), L2 per core (512 KB vs 256 KB), L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB), memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s), ECC support (true vs false), integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (Vega 7) vs UHD Graphics 630), market segment (Mobile vs Desktop), release date (2023-01-03 vs 2020-04-29), and part number (100-000000949 vs SRJFC). The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $488; the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Additionally, the database includes Geekbench scores for the AMD part but not for the Intel part.

The Verdict

Benchmark results show the Intel Core i9-10900TE winning every recorded Cinebench test, but by margins of 0.2% to 0.6%. For practical purposes, the two are equal in rendering performance. The decision rests on platform characteristics. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U is a mobile part with a 15W TDP, ECC memory support, and a newer 7 nm process. It suits power-constrained or mobile systems where efficiency and memory integrity matter. The Intel Core i9-10900TE is a desktop part with 10 cores and 20 threads, a larger 20 MB L3 cache, and a 35W TDP. It suits workloads that can use the extra cores, though the performance advantage over the AMD part is minimal. The data shows both processors at the 54th percentile, reinforcing their similar standing. Users who need ECC or low power should choose AMD; those who want more cores and a desktop platform may prefer Intel, but the performance gap is negligible.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 PRO 7530U
i9-10900TE
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
2,000
1,800 -10.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
4.5 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2,000
1,800 -10.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
4.5 0.0%
Multiplier
20
18 -10.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
15
35 +133.3%
PL1
—
35 W
PL2
—
134 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Comet Lake
Codename
Barcelo-R
Comet Lake
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 3 (Cezanne))
Core i9 (Comet Lake)
Process Size
7 nm
14 nm
Transistors
10,700 million
—
Die Size
180 mm²
206 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
46.9 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP6
Intel Socket 1200
Chipsets
—
Intel Z590, Intel Q570, Intel B560
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics (Vega 7)
UHD Graphics 630
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$488
Part Number
100-000000949
SRJFC
Package
FC-BGA1140
FC-LGA1200
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U Details View Core i9-10900TE Details