AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H vs Intel Core i7-13620H Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
Core i7-13620H
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H vs Intel Core i7-13620H
The Verdict
The Intel Core i7-13620H is the decisive winner in this comparison. Across every single recorded head-to-head benchmark, the Intel part takes the victory, with 15 wins and zero losses. The average benchmark score for the Intel chip is 24911, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H averages 24364, sitting at the 76th percentile. That small overall gap hides a much larger performance chasm in specific workloads. The Intel Core i7-13620H should be the pick for anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput, particularly in multi-threaded rendering, scientific calculations, and prime number workloads. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H, while trailing in every measured test, does offer a smaller die and a more power-efficient process node, but the data shows no scenario where it outperforms the Intel part. For users who need maximum performance in mobile workstations or high-end laptops, the Intel Core i7-13620H is the clear choice. The AMD part remains a capable processor, but it is not competitive with the Intel offering in any recorded metric.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different design philosophies. The Intel Core i7-13620H uses the Raptor Lake-H architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It packs 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. This chip launched on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $502.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache is smaller: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR5, still on a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Radeon 660M. This chip launched on 2022-04-18 and has no recorded launch MSRP in the database. The die size for the AMD part is 208 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Intel chip.
The core count difference is the most striking architectural split: 10 cores versus 6 cores, and 16 threads versus 12 threads. That directly explains the large multi-threaded gaps. The Intel chip also has a higher boost clock, 4.90 GHz versus 4.50 GHz, which supports its single-thread advantage. The AMD part counters with a smaller process node, 6 nm versus 10 nm, and a wider PCIe lane count, 20 versus 8, but those features do not translate into benchmark wins. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The sockets differ as expected: Intel BGA 1744 for the Intel chip, AMD Socket FP7 for the AMD chip.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i7-13620H wins in every recorded category. There is no workload in the database where the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H takes a lead. That said, the magnitude of the Intel advantage varies considerably by workload type, which suggests different use cases can still see different relative experiences.
For multi-threaded productivity, the Intel chip is dominant. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel score is 15176 versus 9561, a 58.7% advantage. That translates directly to faster rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks. The PassMark multithread score shows a 34.9% gap, with 24192 versus 17936. For users running heavy parallel workloads, the Intel part is unequivocally the better choice.
For single-threaded responsiveness, the Intel chip also leads, but by a smaller margin. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 1833 versus 1471, a 24.6% gap. PassMark single-thread shows 3589 versus 3110, a 15.4% gap. This matters for everyday app launch times, light coding, and general desktop snappiness. The Intel chip holds the edge, but the AMD part is not far behind in this category.
For specialized math and encryption tasks, the Intel chip wins by a wide margin. PassMark find prime numbers shows 99 versus 52, a 90.4% gap. PassMark floating point math shows 59762 versus 35743, a 67.2% gap. PassMark physics shows 1671 versus 838, a 99.4% gap. These are extreme divergences that point to the Intel chip's superior computational throughput in scientific and simulation workloads.
For memory and data manipulation, the Intel chip leads again. PassMark data compression shows 281335 versus 217700, a 29.2% gap. PassMark random string sorting shows 29395 versus 22823, a 28.8% gap. PassMark integer math shows 80948 versus 62838, a 28.8% gap. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache and higher core count likely drive these wins.
The AMD chip has no recorded wins, so it cannot be recommended for any specific workload based on performance data. Its only advantages are architectural: a smaller process node, a smaller die, and more PCIe lanes. Those are relevant for system integration and power considerations, but not for benchmark scores.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core i7-13620H scores 15176 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H scores 9561. That is a 58.7% difference in favor of Intel.
Q: How do the two compare in single-threaded performance?
A: The Intel Core i7-13620H leads in Cinebench R23 single-core with 1833 versus 1471, a 24.6% advantage. In PassMark single-thread, the Intel chip scores 3589 versus 3110, a 15.4% gap.
Q: Are there any benchmarks where the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H wins?
A: No. The database records 15 head-to-head benchmarks, and the Intel Core i7-13620H wins all 15. The AMD chip has zero wins.
Q: What is the core and thread count difference?
A: The Intel Core i7-13620H has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?
A: The Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 770, while the AMD chip includes Radeon 660M. The database does not record any graphics benchmark results, so no performance comparison is available from the data.
Q: What is the launch date difference?
A: The Intel Core i7-13620H launched on 2023-01-03. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H launched earlier, on 2022-04-18.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head results are one-sided, but the margins tell a rich story. The biggest win for the Intel Core i7-13620H comes in PassMark physics, where it scores 1671 against the AMD chip's 838, a 99.4% difference. That is nearly double the performance. The next largest gap is in PassMark find prime numbers: 99 versus 52, a 90.4% delta. These two tests highlight the Intel chip's strength in heavy computational loops and number-theoretic workloads.
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the most representative general productivity test, and the Intel chip wins it by 58.7%, scoring 15176 versus 9561. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows a similar pattern, with 2281 versus 1550, a 47.2% delta. The multi-core advantage is consistent across every rendering test.
Floating point math shows a 67.2% gap, with the Intel chip scoring 59762 versus 35743. Integer math is closer but still decisive: 80948 versus 62838, a 28.8% delta. Data compression shows 281335 versus 217700, a 29.2% gap, and random string sorting shows 29395 versus 22823, another 28.8% delta. These results indicate the Intel chip handles both structured and unstructured data manipulation with ease.
The encryption test shows the smallest gap among multi-threaded workloads: 15568 versus 13518, a 15.2% delta. Extended instructions show 17513 versus 15044, a 16.4% gap. These are still Intel wins, but the AMD chip is relatively less disadvantaged in these areas.
Single-threaded results are the closest of all. Cinebench R15 single-core shows 263 versus 236, an 11.4% delta. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 1833 versus 1471, a 24.6% delta. PassMark single-thread shows 3589 versus 3110, a 15.4% delta. The Intel chip leads in every single-thread test, but the margins are smaller than in multi-threaded tests, suggesting the AMD architecture is competitive on a per-core basis even though it has fewer cores.
The PassMark multithread test, which aggregates overall threaded performance, shows 24192 versus 17936, a 34.9% gap. That aligns with the average benchmark score difference: 24911 versus 24364. The average score gap is only 2.2%, but that is because the database includes many different tests, and the AMD chip is not far behind in some areas. The head-to-head tests, however, show that in every single recorded comparison, the Intel chip is ahead.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every major specification field. The Intel Core i7-13620H uses 10 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H uses 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks differ: 2.40 GHz for Intel versus 3.30 GHz for AMD, but boost clocks reverse that order: 4.90 GHz for Intel versus 4.50 GHz for AMD. Both have a TDP of 45, so power draw is nominally the same.
The cache hierarchy is different at every level. Intel has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. AMD has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has more cache at every tier, which contributes to its benchmark wins.
Memory support diverges: Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. Both use a dual-channel bus. The AMD chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel chip. PCIe connectivity differs: Intel uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes, AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The AMD chip offers more lanes but an older generation.
The integrated graphics are different: Intel has UHD Graphics 770, AMD has Radeon 660M. Neither is benchmarked in the database, so no performance conclusion can be drawn. The process node differs: Intel is on 10 nm, AMD is on 6 nm. The foundry also differs: Intel uses its own foundry, AMD uses TSMC. The AMD die size is 208 mm², while no die size is recorded for Intel. The sockets are different: Intel BGA 1744 versus AMD Socket FP7.
Release dates differ by roughly nine months: Intel launched on 2023-01-03, AMD on 2022-04-18. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $502, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The production status for both is active. The part numbers are SRMJ0 for Intel and 100-000000543100-000000565 for AMD.