AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H vs Intel Core i7-1360P Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
Core i7-1360P
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H vs Intel Core i7-1360P
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H and Intel Core i7-1360P are virtually tied in overall average benchmark score, with the AMD part at 24364 and the Intel part at 24344, a difference of just 0.1%. Despite this near-parity in aggregate performance, the data reveals two very distinct performance profiles. The Intel Core i7-1360P wins the majority of benchmark comparisons, taking 11 of 15 head-to-head tests, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H wins the remaining 4, but by substantial margins in specific workloads. The verdict is clear: choose the Intel Core i7-1360P for general-purpose computing, single-threaded responsiveness, and heavily parallel tasks like rendering. Choose the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H specifically for data compression, encryption, and extended instruction workloads, where its lead is decisive.
The Verdict
The performance data points to the Intel Core i7-1360P as the more versatile mobile processor. It holds a commanding lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 11266.5 versus the AMD's 9561, a 15.1% advantage. This translates directly to faster rendering and video encoding tasks. The Intel chip also dominates single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1829 compared to 1471, a 19.6% gap, which is critical for snappy application loading and general desktop feel. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H, however, is not without its strengths. It wins the PassMark data compression test by 6.8% (217700 vs 203746) and data encryption by 8.5% (13518 vs 12463). Most notably, it crushes the Intel part in extended instructions, scoring 15044 versus 11581, a massive 29.9% advantage, making it the superior choice for specialized, AVX-heavy scientific or financial workloads. For the vast majority of users, the Intel Core i7-1360P is the better buy based on its benchmark dominance. The AMD is a niche pick for specific, instruction-heavy tasks.
Architecture Differences
The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H is a 6-core, 12-thread part based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm². In contrast, the Intel Core i7-1360P is a 12-core, 16-thread processor using the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-P. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process. The core count difference is significant, with Intel offering double the physical cores, though its hybrid architecture likely contributes to its thread count being only 16 versus the AMD's 12. Cache configurations also differ substantially. The AMD uses a 64 KB L1 cache per core, a 512 KB L2 cache per core, and a 16 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel uses an 80 KB L1 cache per core, a 2 MB L2 cache per core, and a larger 18 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD is exclusively DDR5. Both have integrated graphics, with the AMD featuring a Radeon 660M and the Intel an Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The Intel chip has a higher boost clock at 5.00 GHz versus the AMD's 4.50 GHz, but the AMD has a higher base clock at 3.30 GHz versus the Intel's 2.20 GHz.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark results show a clear split in workload dominance. The Intel Core i7-1360P wins decisively in compute-heavy tasks. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 1858 against 1550, a 16.6% lead. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result is similarly lopsided at 15.1% in favor of Intel. The single-core results are even more telling, with Intel leading by 8.5% in R15 (258 vs 236) and 19.6% in R23 (1829 vs 1471). The Intel processor also leads in PassMark's floating point math by 22.3% (45997 vs 35743), integer math by 7.5% (67963 vs 62838), and physics by a staggering 34.5% (1280 vs 838). It also wins the PassMark multithread test (18632 vs 17936, a 3.7% lead) and the single-thread test (3461 vs 3110, a 10.1% lead). The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H fights back in more specialized areas. Its biggest win is in extended instructions, where it beats Intel by 29.9% (15044 vs 11581). It also wins data encryption by 8.5% (13518 vs 12463) and data compression by 6.8% (217700 vs 203746). Finally, it edges out Intel in random string sorting by 1.3% (22823 vs 22522).
FAQ
Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core rendering?
A: The Intel Core i7-1360P is significantly faster. It scores 11266.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core versus the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H's 9561, a 15.1% advantage.
Q: The AMD has fewer cores and threads. Does it lose all multi-threaded tests?
A: No. Despite having 6 cores and 12 threads versus Intel's 12 cores and 16 threads, the AMD wins the PassMark data compression test (217700 vs 203746) and the data encryption test (13518 vs 12463).
Q: Is there a big difference in single-core performance?
A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-1360P is clearly ahead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1829, which is 19.6% higher than the AMD's score of 1471.
Q: What kind of workload favors the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H?
A: The data shows the AMD excels in tasks that use extended instructions. It leads by 29.9% in the PassMark extended instructions test (15044 vs 11581), making it potentially better for specialized scientific or cryptographic software.
Q: Which processor has a higher overall average benchmark score?
A: The scores are almost identical. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H has an average benchmark score of 24364, while the Intel Core i7-1360P has 24344, a difference of just 0.1%.
Q: Which chip is more efficient based on the data?
A: The Intel Core i7-1360P has a lower TDP of 28 W compared to the AMD's 45 W, while also delivering higher performance in most tests, indicating better performance-per-watt.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i7-1360P is the clear winner for most productivity and creative workloads. Its substantial leads in Cinebench R23 multi-core (15.1%) and single-core (19.6%) make it the better choice for video editing, 3D rendering, and any application that relies on strong per-core performance. The 22.3% lead in floating-point math (45997 vs 35743) and 34.5% lead in the physics test (1280 vs 838) further solidify its position for simulation and scientific computing. For general multitasking, its 3.7% lead in the PassMark multithread test (18632 vs 17936) shows it handles concurrent workloads better. The Intel chip's 10.1% lead in single-thread performance (3461 vs 3110) ensures a more responsive experience in everyday use.
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H is the winner in a few specific, high-value areas. Its 29.9% lead in extended instructions (15044 vs 11581) is its most significant victory, making it the superior choice for software that can leverage AVX-512 or similar instruction sets. In data-heavy tasks, it wins both the compression test (217700 vs 203746, a 6.8% lead) and the encryption test (13518 vs 12463, an 8.5% lead). This makes it a strong contender for database management, file archiving, and secure communication workloads. The narrow 1.3% win in random string sorting (22823 vs 22522) also suggests a slight edge in certain text-processing or sorting algorithms.
Specification Differences
The key differences in specifications between the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H and Intel Core i7-1360P are numerous. The AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel has 12 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is higher on the AMD at 3.30 GHz versus the Intel's 2.20 GHz, but the Intel's boost clock is higher at 5.00 GHz versus 4.50 GHz. The TDP also differs, with the AMD rated at 45 W and the Intel at 28 W. The AMD uses the AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel uses Intel BGA 1744. In terms of architecture, the AMD is Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) on a 6 nm TSMC process, and the Intel is Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-P) on a 10 nm Intel process. The cache layouts are different: the AMD has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core with 16 MB shared L3, while the Intel has 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core with 18 MB shared L3. The AMD supports only DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, whereas the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both have Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes. The integrated graphics are Radeon 660M for AMD and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for Intel. Finally, the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $480, while the AMD has no listed launch MSRP.