AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U vs Intel Xeon E-2176M Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U

CORE STATE Cezanne-U
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.3 Base / 4.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon E-2176M

CORE STATE Coffee Lake-H
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 4.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Coffee Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2018

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,207
921
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
218
129
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
6,429
9,140
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,363
1,290
geekbench_multicore
5,577
4,787
geekbench_singlecore
1,486
1,362
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
3,838
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
541

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U vs Intel Xeon E-2176M

The Intel Xeon E-2176M and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U are both 6-core, 12-thread processors, yet the recorded data places them in very different corners of the market. The Xeon is a Coffee Lake part built for server and workstation systems, while the Ryzen PRO is a Zen 3 mobile chip. Across six head-to-head benchmarks, the AMD part wins five, but the Intel part takes the single most lopsided victory. The numbers reveal two very different performance profiles, and the split is not a simple generational story.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are dominated by the AMD part. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U scores 1207 against the Xeon's 921, a 23.7% lead. The R15 single-core test is even more one-sided: AMD scores 218, Intel 129, a 40.8% gap, the largest margin in the entire comparison. Geekbench tells a similar story. The AMD part scores 5577 in multicore versus 4787, a 14.2% lead, and 1486 in single-core versus 1362, an 8.3% lead. Cinebench R23 single-core also goes to AMD, 1363 versus 1290, a 5.4% margin.

Then comes the reversal. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Intel Xeon E-2176M scores 9140 against the AMD part's 6429, a 42.2% lead. That is the only Intel win, and it is the largest margin in either direction. The direction flip between R15 multicore and R23 multicore is striking: AMD leads the older render test by 23.7%, while Intel leads the newer render test by 42.2%. The two chips clearly scale very differently as the workload changes.

The aggregate picture is more nuanced. The Intel part's average benchmark score is 2751, slightly above the AMD part's 2713. Both sit at the 50th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel average is pulled up by that massive R23 multicore result, while the AMD part wins more individual tests. Looking at nearest rivals, the Xeon's 2751 average sits within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE (2767), the AMD Ryzen 3 5400U (2765), the AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE (2759), and the AMD EPYC 7261 (2740). The Ryzen PRO's 2713 average sits within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 4700U (2722), the Intel Xeon D-1577 (2715), the Intel Core i7-11390H (2715), and the Intel Xeon E-2226G (2709). Both parts are firmly mid-pack.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share a 6-core, 12-thread layout with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, dual-channel DDR4 memory support, and locked multipliers. Everything else differs. The Intel part is built on Intel's 14 nm process with a 154 mm² die, while the AMD part uses TSMC's 7 nm process with a 180 mm² die and 10,700 million transistors. The Intel part's transistor count is not recorded in the database.

Cache configurations diverge. The Xeon has 256 KB of L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen PRO has 512 KB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3. Memory bandwidth also favors AMD: 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s. The Intel part supports ECC memory; the AMD part does not. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the Xeon exposes Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Ryzen PRO exposes Gen 3 with 8 lanes. Integrated graphics are different too: the Xeon carries UHD Graphics P630, the Ryzen PRO carries Radeon Vega 7.

Clock speeds and power draw set the two apart. The Intel part has a 2.70 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost, with a 45W TDP. The AMD part has a 2.30 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost, with a 15W TDP. The AMD part delivers most of its benchmark wins at one-third the TDP. The sockets are incompatible: Intel BGA 1440 versus AMD Socket FP6. The market positioning is also different: the Xeon is a server/workstation part, the Ryzen PRO is a mobile part. The Xeon was released on 2018-04-03 and is end-of-life; the Ryzen PRO was released on 2021-03-15 and is active.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U wins every single-core test in the comparison. The margins are 40.8% in Cinebench R15, 5.4% in Cinebench R23, and 8.3% in Geekbench. It also wins Geekbench multicore by 14.2% and Cinebench R15 multicore by 23.7%. For lightly threaded workloads, general productivity, and the older Cinebench render test, the AMD part is the clear choice. Its 15W TDP also means it achieves these results in a much lower power envelope than the Intel part's 45W.

The Intel Xeon E-2176M wins Cinebench R23 multicore by 42.2%, a decisive margin in the newest render workload. It also holds a slightly higher aggregate average score, 2751 versus 2713. Beyond benchmarks, the Intel part offers ECC memory support and 16 PCIe lanes versus 8, which are meaningful for workstation and server configurations. The AMD part counters with more L3 cache (16 MB versus 12 MB) and higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s).

The data implies a clear split. For single-threaded and general-purpose workloads, the AMD part is ahead. For the specific heavy multi-threaded render workload in Cinebench R23, the Intel part is far ahead. The R15-to-R23 flip suggests that the Intel part's advantage grows as the render workload becomes more demanding, while the AMD part's advantage is broader but shallower.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U is the better choice for most users. It wins five of six head-to-head benchmarks, including all single-core tests, and does so at a 15W TDP. It is also an active product, while the Intel part is end-of-life. The AMD part's advantages in L3 cache and memory bandwidth align with its benchmark wins.

The Intel Xeon E-2176M is the better choice only in specific scenarios. If the workload is Cinebench R23-style heavy multi-threaded rendering, the Intel part leads by 42.2%. If ECC memory support is required, the Intel part is the only option of the two. If the system needs 16 PCIe lanes rather than 8, the Intel part provides them. The Intel part also has the higher aggregate average score, 2751 versus 2713, though it loses most head-to-head tests.

The data does not support a single universal winner. It supports a workload-dependent decision. The AMD part wins the broad majority of tests at a fraction of the power. The Intel part wins the most demanding render test and offers server-oriented features. The choice comes down to whether the workload matches the Intel part's specific strengths.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U wins 5 of the 6 head-to-head tests. The Intel Xeon E-2176M wins 1.

Q: What is the largest performance gap in either direction?

A: The Intel part's Cinebench R23 multicore win is 42.2% ahead of AMD. The AMD part's Cinebench R15 single-core win is 40.8% ahead of Intel.

Q: Do both CPUs have the same core and thread count?

A: Yes, both have 6 cores and 12 threads, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2176M supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U does not.

Q: How do their TDPs compare?

A: The Intel part has a 45W TDP, while the AMD part has a 15W TDP.

Q: Which CPU has more L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U has 16 MB shared L3 cache, while the Intel Xeon E-2176M has 12 MB shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Xeon E-2176M | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |

| Base clock | 2.70 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45W | 15W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1440 | AMD Socket FP6 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Coffee Lake-H | Cezanne-U |

| Process node | 14 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 10,700 million |

| Die size | 154 mm² | 180 mm² |

| L2 cache | 256 KB per core | 512 KB per core |

| L3 cache | 12 MB shared | 16 MB shared |

| Memory bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 lanes | Gen 3, 8 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Vega 7 |

| Market segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Production status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release date | 2018-04-03 | 2021-03-15 |

| Launch MSRP | $450 | Not recorded |

| Part number | SR3YX | 100-000000290 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 PRO 5650U
E-2176M
Core Specs
Cores
6
6 0.0%
Threads
12
12 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.3
2.7 +17.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.2
4.4 +4.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2.3
2.7 +17.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.2
4.4 +4.8%
Multiplier
23
27 +17.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
15
45 +200.0%
Configurable TDP
25W
35 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Coffee Lake
Codename
Cezanne-U
Coffee Lake-H
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 3 (Cezanne))
Xeon E (Coffee Lake)
Process Size
7 nm
14 nm
Transistors
10,700 million
—
Die Size
180 mm²
154 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
42.7 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP6
Intel BGA 1440
PCIe
Gen 3, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 7
UHD Graphics P630
Other
Market
Mobile
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
End-of-life
Launch Price
—
$450
Part Number
100-000000290
SR3YX
Package
FC-BGA1140
FC-BGA1440
Tj Max
105°C
100°C
View Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U Details View Xeon E-2176M Details