AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE vs Intel Xeon 6325P Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE and Intel Xeon 6325P are two very different processors that land in the same performance bracket. The AMD chip, a 6-core 12-thread desktop part from the 4000 series built on TSMC's 7 nm process, and the Intel Xeon, a 4-core 8-thread server/workstation part with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, both achieve a 74th percentile ranking among all CPUs and nearly identical average benchmark scores. Their overall scores differ by only 0.4%, with the AMD at 20900 and the Intel at 20821, yet the breakdown of individual tests reveals a stark division of labor.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits these two processors into distinct roles based on workload type. The Intel Xeon 6325P takes the overwhelming majority of victories, winning 13 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons. Its wins are concentrated in compute-heavy, single-threaded, and physics-based tasks. The Xeon dominates the Cinebench suite across the board, winning all six render tests by a consistent margin of 12.2% or 12.3%. It also wins PassMark's floating point math, integer math, multithread, physics, and prime number tests. The physics test is particularly lopsided, with the Xeon scoring 1020 against the AMD's 592, a 42% advantage.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE wins only 4 of the 17 comparisons, but its victories are in memory-oriented and data-processing workloads. The AMD chip wins data compression (193067 vs 178020, an 8.5% edge), data encryption (11586 vs 9311, a 24.4% edge), extended instructions (11792 vs 11645, a 1.3% edge), and random string sorting (21382 vs 19113, an 11.9% edge). These are tasks where the AMD's 6-core configuration and higher thread count help it process multiple data streams concurrently, even against the Intel's superior per-core clock speed. The pattern is clear: the Xeon wins raw computational throughput, while the AMD wins data manipulation and security-related tasks.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark results, the Intel Xeon 6325P is the stronger processor for general compute workloads. Its 12.2% advantage across all Cinebench versions, from R15 to R23, indicates that it will render frames faster, compile code quicker, and handle any task that relies on sustained CPU throughput. The Xeon's 36.9% lead in PassMark single-thread performance (4213 vs 2660) makes it the clear choice for applications that cannot leverage multiple cores effectively. Its 42% lead in physics simulations further reinforces this, as those workloads often depend on fast integer and floating-point calculations.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE is the better option for specific data-centric workloads. Its 24.4% lead in data encryption and 11.9% lead in random string sorting suggest it handles cryptographic operations and text processing more efficiently. The 8.5% win in data compression also points to its suitability for archiving and database tasks. However, these wins are fewer and narrower than the Intel's, so the AMD only makes sense for systems where those specific workloads dominate. For a balanced recommendation, the Xeon's broader sweep of victories gives it the overall edge, but the AMD's specialized wins mean it is not without purpose.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive wins for the Intel Xeon 6325P come in the PassMark physics test and the single-thread tests. In physics, the Xeon scores 1020 against the AMD's 592, a 42% gap that is the largest margin of any test. The single-thread results are nearly as dramatic, with the Xeon at 4213 versus the AMD's 2660, a 36.9% difference. The prime number test also shows a massive Intel advantage, with the Xeon scoring 66 against the AMD's 28, a 57.6% swing. These tests highlight the Xeon's ability to execute simple, high-frequency calculations far faster than the AMD part.

The Cinebench results are consistent but less extreme. Across all six versions of Cinebench (R15, R20, and R23, each in single and multi-core), the Xeon wins by either 12.2% or 12.3%. The multi-core scores tell the story: the Xeon posts 1382 in R15, 5761 in R20, and 13717 in R23, while the AMD manages 1213, 5058, and 12045 respectively. Even with two fewer cores, the Xeon's higher clock speeds and newer architecture overcome the AMD's core count advantage in these render tests.

The AMD's biggest win is in data encryption, where it beats the Xeon by 24.4% (11586 vs 9311). Random string sorting is the next largest AMD victory at 11.9% (21382 vs 19113), followed by data compression at 8.5% (193067 vs 178020). The extended instructions win is marginal at 1.3% (11792 vs 11645). Interestingly, the floating point math test goes to the Intel by 25% (37265 vs 27947), showing that even in a math-heavy workload, the Xeon's superior per-core throughput wins out. The integer math test is the closest overall, with the Xeon winning by just 1.3% (49151 vs 48513).

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-threaded tasks?

A: The Intel Xeon 6325P is significantly faster. It scores 4213 in PassMark single-thread, 195 in Cinebench R15, 813 in R20, and 1936 in R23, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE scores 2660, 171, 714, and 1700 respectively. This gives the Intel a 36.9% lead in PassMark and a 12.2% lead in all Cinebench tests.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, the AMD wins 4 of 17 head-to-head tests: data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting. Its largest win is data encryption at 24.4% over the Intel, followed by random string sorting at 11.9%.

Q: How do their overall benchmark averages compare?

A: The processors are nearly identical overall. The AMD has an average benchmark score of 20900, while the Intel has 20821, a difference of only 0.4%. Both are in the 74th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Xeon 6325P has 4 cores and 8 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the Intel wins the multi-core Cinebench tests by 12.2%.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon 6325P has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the AMD's 4.20 GHz boost. The Intel also has a higher base clock at 3.50 GHz compared to the AMD's 3.30 GHz.

Q: Is there a significant difference in their memory support?

A: The AMD supports only DDR4 memory, while the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both support ECC memory and use a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD's memory bandwidth is listed at 51.2 GB/s, while no figure is given for the Intel.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectures and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE uses the Zen 2 architecture, specifically the Renoir codename, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It contains 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die. The Intel Xeon 6325P uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its die size is 163 mm², but no transistor count is listed. The Intel is listed as part of the Xeon 6 generation (Raptor Lake Refresh), while the AMD is a 4000 series desktop part.

Cache configurations differ noticeably. The AMD has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel's larger L2 and L3 caches, combined with its higher clock speeds, help explain its dominance in single-threaded and physics workloads. The AMD's integrated graphics are a Radeon Vega 7, while the Intel has no integrated graphics (N/A). The AMD uses PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes, while the Intel uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, showing a generational leap in interconnect technology for the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The most obvious difference is in physical specs and platform support. The AMD uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD has a TDP of 35 watts, which is lower than the Intel's 55 watts. The AMD's base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost of 4.20 GHz, while the Intel's base is 3.50 GHz with a boost of 5.20 GHz. The Intel's higher TDP and clocks reflect its performance-oriented design, while the AMD's lower TDP suggests a more power-efficient part.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD supports only DDR4, while the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD has a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is provided for the Intel. Both support ECC memory and dual-channel memory buses. The AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel has 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD's release date is 2022-11-10, while the Intel's is 2025-02-23. The Intel has a launch MSRP of $281, while no MSRP is listed for the AMD. The AMD's part number is 100-000001156100-100001156MPK, and the Intel's is SRPLX. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as Active in production status. The AMD targets the Desktop market segment, while the Intel targets Server/Workstation.