AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE vs Intel Core i3-13100E Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the majority of the head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE wins 6 of the 8 recorded head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core i3-13100E wins 2.

Q: How does the Intel Core i3-13100E compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE in Geekbench single-core performance?

A: The Intel chip scores 2001 in Geekbench single-core, which is 24.4% ahead of the AMD processor's 1513.

Q: What is the difference in multi-core performance in the Cinebench R23 test?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE scores 13044 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 11.4% higher than the Intel Core i3-13100E's 11710.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE and the Intel Core i3-13100E support ECC memory.

Q: What are the process nodes used by each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is built on a 7 nm process, while the Intel Core i3-13100E uses a 10 nm process.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100E has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE's 4.20 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE and Intel Core i3-13100E represent fundamentally different design approaches from their respective manufacturers. The AMD part belongs to the 4000 series and uses the Zen 2 architecture under the Renoir codename, fabricated by TSMC on a 7 nm process. The Intel part is from Core 13th Gen, using Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename, fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process.

The core configurations diverge significantly. The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE offers 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i3-13100E provides 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives the AMD processor a 2-core and 4-thread advantage in raw parallel capacity. The AMD chip features a base clock of 3.30 GHz, matching the Intel chip's base clock, but the Intel chip boosts higher at 4.40 GHz versus 4.20 GHz for the AMD part.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. The AMD processor has 64 KB L1 cache per core and 512 KB L2 per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. This means the Intel part has larger per-core L2 and a bigger L3 pool, which can benefit certain workloads. The die sizes are close, with the AMD chip at 156 mm² and the Intel chip at 163 mm², though the AMD chip integrates 9,800 million transistors while the Intel transistor count is not recorded.

Memory support is a key differentiator. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration and a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Core i3-13100E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, though its memory bandwidth figure is not recorded. PCIe capability also differs: the AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 3, while the Intel chip supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part features Radeon Vega 7 graphics, while the Intel part has UHD Graphics 730. Both processors are unlocked, meaning their multipliers cannot be adjusted. They also target the desktop market segment and are both in active production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear split across benchmark suites. In Cinebench tests, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE consistently outperforms the Intel Core i3-13100E by exactly 11.4% in every iteration. This includes Cinebench R15 multi-core, where AMD scores 1314 against Intel's 1180, and single-core, where AMD scores 185 versus 166. The pattern continues in Cinebench R20 with AMD at 5478 multi-core and 773 single-core, versus Intel at 4918 and 694. In Cinebench R23, AMD records 13044 multi-core and 1841 single-core, while Intel delivers 11710 and 1653. The consistent 11.4% delta across all Cinebench tests suggests the AMD processor's additional cores and threads provide a stable advantage in rendering workloads.

The Geekbench results tell the opposite story. The Intel Core i3-13100E wins Geekbench multi-core with a score of 7025 against AMD's 5710, a margin of 18.7% in favor of Intel. The single-core gap is even larger, with Intel scoring 2001 against AMD's 1513, a 24.4% advantage. These results indicate that the Intel processor's higher boost clock and newer architecture deliver substantial gains in workloads that favor single-threaded performance and certain multi-threaded tasks.

Looking at the overall benchmark averages, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE has an average benchmark score of 3732, while the Intel Core i3-13100E averages 3668. This puts the AMD chip just 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-11600T and 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-11260H in its nearest rival grouping. The Intel chip sits 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 7251 and 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X. Both processors occupy the 56th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating they are evenly matched in overall standing despite their different benchmark profiles.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i3-13100E has 4 cores and 8 threads. The boost clock differs, with Intel at 4.40 GHz versus AMD at 4.20 GHz, while the base clock is identical at 3.30 GHz. Thermal design power also differs: the AMD chip has a 35 TDP, while the Intel chip has a 60 TDP.

The socket and architecture are entirely different. AMD uses Socket AM4 with Zen 2 architecture, while Intel uses Socket 1700 with Raptor Lake. The process nodes differ as noted, with AMD on 7 nm and Intel on 10 nm. The transistor count is recorded only for AMD at 9,800 million, with no figure for Intel. The die sizes are close, at 156 mm² for AMD and 163 mm² for Intel.

Cache specifications differ per core and in total. AMD has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, while Intel has 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core. The L3 cache is 8 MB shared for AMD and 12 MB shared for Intel. Memory support varies, with AMD limited to DDR4 and Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for AMD at 51.2 GB/s. PCIe generation differs, with AMD at Gen 3 and Intel at Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the CPU. Integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 7 for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The release dates differ by roughly two and a half years, with AMD launching on 2020-07-20 and Intel on 2023-01-03. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $480.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is the clear winner in Cinebench rendering workloads, taking all six Cinebench tests by a uniform 11.4% margin. This makes it the stronger choice for multi-threaded rendering tasks, 3D modeling, and any application that scales well with core count. Its 6-core and 12-thread configuration, combined with a lower 35 TDP, suggests it can deliver steady multi-core performance in thermally constrained environments. The AMD chip's 7 nm process and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth further support its efficiency-oriented design. Users running video exports, batch image processing, or CPU-based rendering will find the AMD processor's consistent Cinebench advantage meaningful.

The Intel Core i3-13100E wins decisively in Geekbench, both in single-core and multi-core. The 24.4% single-core advantage and 18.7% multi-core advantage indicate that the Intel processor excels in lightly threaded applications, everyday desktop responsiveness, and workloads that benefit from high clock speeds and newer architecture. The 4.40 GHz boost clock likely drives much of this performance. The Intel chip also offers PCIe Gen 5 support, which can be relevant for systems with the latest storage and expansion cards. For tasks like web browsing, office productivity, coding, and single-threaded legacy applications, the Intel processor provides the better recorded performance.

The specification differences point to distinct use cases. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE, with its 35 TDP and AM4 socket, suits compact or low-power desktop builds where thermal headroom is limited. The Intel Core i3-13100E, with its 60 TDP and support for both DDR4 and DDR5, offers memory flexibility and a path to newer platform features. Both processors support ECC memory, making them viable for entry-level workstation or server scenarios. The AMD chip's lower TDP may be preferable for always-on systems, while the Intel chip's higher boost clock and Geekbench results favor interactive workloads. Ultimately, the database shows a 6-to-2 win split in favor of AMD, but the Intel processor's Geekbench victories highlight that the best choice depends on the specific application mix.