AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data presents a consistent picture across every recorded Cinebench test. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins all six recorded comparisons, though by narrow margins. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD scores 665 against the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4's 651, a delta of -2.1% from Intel's perspective. The single-core R15 test shows a similar pattern: AMD scores 93, Intel scores 91, a delta of -2.2%.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the results hold steady. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE records 2774 in multi-core, while the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 manages 2714, again a -2.2% delta. In R20 single-core, the AMD scores 391 versus Intel's 383, a -2% difference. The R23 tests continue this trend: multi-core sees AMD at 6606 and Intel at 6464 (-2.1%), while single-core sees AMD at 932 and Intel at 912 (-2.1%).

The consistency across all six tests is noteworthy. The AMD processor's advantage ranges only from -2% to -2.2%, indicating that the two chips are exceptionally close in raw compute throughput. The largest absolute gap is in R23 multi-core, where AMD leads by 142 points. The smallest absolute gap is in R15 single-core, where AMD leads by just 2 points.

The average benchmark score in the database reinforces this tight competition. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE holds an average score of 1910, while the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 sits at 1869. That difference of 41 points places the AMD chip slightly higher in overall standing, and its percentile rank of 43 versus Intel's 42 confirms the narrow separation.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins every single head-to-head comparison. There are no tests in the database where the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 comes out ahead. This makes the use-case split straightforward: for any workload represented by Cinebench R15, R20, or R23, whether single-threaded or multi-threaded, the AMD chip delivers the higher score.

That said, the margins are small enough that real-world differences would likely be imperceptible in most applications. A 2% advantage in a rendering benchmark does not translate to a dramatic user experience difference. The Intel chip's nearest rivals in the database, such as the Intel Core i3-9350K with an average score of 1867 and a delta of 0.1%, and the Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 with 1879 and -0.5%, show that the Xeon sits in a crowded field of similar performers.

For the AMD side, its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 at an identical 1910 average score, and the Intel Xeon E-2314 at 1911 with a -0.1% delta. This suggests that the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is performing at a level consistent with several Intel workstation-class chips, despite its lower TDP and different architecture.

The practical takeaway is that the AMD chip wins on every recorded metric, but the wins are narrow. Users prioritizing the absolute highest Cinebench score should choose the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE. Users who need other attributes, such as platform features or power characteristics, may find the Intel chip competitive despite its benchmark deficit.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ substantially in their underlying architecture, even though both use a 14 nm process node. The Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 is built on the Broadwell architecture, specifically Broadwell-EP, and is manufactured by Intel. It contains 3,400 million transistors on a 246 mm² die. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE uses the Zen architecture with the Raven Ridge codename, fabricated by GlobalFoundries, and packs 4,950 million transistors into a 210 mm² die. The AMD chip has 1,550 million more transistors on a smaller die, indicating a denser design.

Cache configurations diverge as well. The Intel Xeon provides 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 10 MB L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen offers 96 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, but only 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip's larger L3 pool could benefit certain workloads, though the benchmark data does not isolate cache-sensitive tests.

Memory support also differs. Both support DDR4, but the Intel Xeon uses a quad-channel memory bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen uses a dual-channel bus with 46.9 GB/s. The Intel chip's memory bandwidth advantage is substantial on paper, yet the Cinebench scores do not reflect a corresponding performance lead. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe lane counts differ significantly. The Intel Xeon provides Gen 3 with 40 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD Ryzen offers Gen 3 with only 8 lanes from the CPU. This makes the Intel platform more suitable for expansion-heavy configurations such as multiple GPUs or storage controllers.

The integrated graphics situation is one-sided. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE includes Radeon RX Vega 11 integrated graphics. The Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 has no integrated graphics listed in the database. This is a critical difference for systems that require a display output without a discrete GPU.

Other differences include the socket: Intel uses Socket 2011-3, while AMD uses Socket AM4. The Intel chip has a TDP of 140 watts, while the AMD chip has a TDP of 35 watts. The AMD processor also has a lower base clock (3.20 GHz versus 3.70 GHz) and a lower boost clock (3.80 GHz versus 4.00 GHz), yet still wins in benchmarks. The Intel part is end-of-life, while the AMD part is listed as active production. The Intel chip's launch MSRP is $406; the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE scores 6606 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 scores 6464, giving AMD a 2.1% advantage.

Q: How do the two chips compare in single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, AMD scores 932 versus Intel's 912, a 2.1% difference. In R20, AMD scores 391 versus Intel's 383, and in R15, AMD scores 93 versus Intel's 91.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE have ECC memory support listed in the database.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 has a TDP of 140 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has a TDP of 35 watts. The AMD chip uses substantially less power.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has integrated graphics, specifically Radeon RX Vega 11. The Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 has no integrated graphics listed.

Q: How does the average benchmark score compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has an average benchmark score of 1910, placing it at the 43rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 has an average score of 1869, placing it at the 42nd percentile.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE outperforms the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 in every recorded Cinebench test. The AMD chip wins all six head-to-head comparisons, with deltas ranging from -2% to -2.2%. Its average benchmark score of 1910 also exceeds the Intel chip's 1869.

For users selecting purely on benchmark performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is the clear choice. It delivers higher scores in both single-core and multi-core workloads across three generations of Cinebench tests. The consistency of the AMD advantage, even if narrow, means there is no recorded scenario where the Intel chip pulls ahead.

However, the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 offers other documented advantages. Its 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is significantly higher than the AMD's 46.9 GB/s, and its 40 PCIe lanes dwarf the AMD's 8 lanes. For systems that require extensive memory throughput or many expansion cards, the Intel platform may be preferable despite lower benchmark scores.

The power difference is also notable. The AMD chip's 35 watt TDP versus the Intel's 140 watts makes it far more suitable for compact or energy-conscious builds. The AMD chip also includes integrated graphics, which can simplify system design.

The production status favors AMD as well: the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is listed as active, while the Xeon E5-1630 v4 is end-of-life. For new system designs, the AMD chip offers a longer availability horizon.

The decision comes down to platform needs. If Cinebench scores are the priority, choose the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE. If memory bandwidth, PCIe expansion, or the Intel ecosystem matter more, the Xeon E5-1630 v4 remains competitive despite its benchmark deficit. The data does not support a universal recommendation for the Intel chip, but its platform features may justify its selection in specific configurations.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 3.70 GHz | 3.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.00 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| TDP | 140 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Broadwell | Zen |

| Codename | Broadwell-EP | Raven Ridge |

| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | 3,400 million | 4,950 million |

| Die Size | 246 mm² | 210 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 10 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 46.9 GB/s |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 3, 40 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon RX Vega 11 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2016-06-19 | 2018-05-09 |

| Launch MSRP | $406 | Not recorded |