AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Intel Processor U300 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE or the Intel Processor U300?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Processor U300 has 5 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part uses a traditional symmetric layout, whereas the Intel part uses a hybrid configuration.

Q: How does the single-core performance compare between the two chips?

A: The Intel Processor U300 leads in single-core tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1616 versus 932 for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE, a delta of 42.3%. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Intel chip scores 222 versus 93, a 58.1% advantage.

Q: What are the power envelopes for both processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Processor U300 is rated at 15 watts. The database records the Intel chip as a Mobile segment part and the AMD chip as Desktop.

Q: Which processor offers better multi-core performance in the newer Cinebench R23 test?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins multi-core in Cinebench R23. It scores 6606 versus 4905 for the Intel Processor U300, a 34.7% lead. However, in the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test, the Intel wins 781 to 665, a 14.9% gap.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor U300 does not. The AMD chip also uses DDR4 memory, whereas the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has an average benchmark score of 1910, and the Intel Processor U300 has an average of 1881. Both sit at the 43rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning they are statistically close in overall performance.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is built around the Zen architecture, codenamed Raven Ridge. It is manufactured on a 14 nm process by GlobalFoundries, with a die size of 210 mm² and 4,950 million transistors. The CPU is part of the 2000 series and uses the AMD Socket AM4.

The Intel Processor U300 is based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U, and is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. It is a mobile part with a BGA 1744 socket. The process node and die size differences are substantial, but the more impactful architectural split lies in cache layout and memory support.

The AMD chip provides 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 4 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a larger 8 MB shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel part a significant advantage in total cache capacity, which often aids in single-threaded workloads and memory-latency sensitive tasks.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE supports only DDR4 memory and has a recorded memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. The Intel Processor U300 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, though its memory bandwidth is not listed in the database. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not, which is a notable feature for workloads requiring data integrity.

The integrated graphics differ: the AMD uses Radeon RX Vega 11, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics 48EU. The PCIe interface also differs: the AMD has Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel has Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), giving the Intel faster peripheral bandwidth potential.

The Intel Processor U300 has a base clock of 1200.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, while the AMD has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The TDP difference is notable: 35 watts for the AMD versus 15 watts for the Intel, which is why the Intel part is classified as mobile and the AMD as desktop, despite the AMD's older process node.

The Verdict

From the database, the Intel Processor U300 wins the majority of the head-to-head benchmark tests, taking 3 out of 4. It is the clear winner in single-core performance, with a 42.3% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and a 58.1% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core. For users prioritizing single-threaded responsiveness, such as productivity and light gaming, the Intel is the data-backed choice.

However, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins the most modern multi-core benchmark in the head-to-head set, Cinebench R23 multi-core, by a 34.7% margin. That is a strong signal for multi-threaded workloads that scale well, such as rendering or compilation. The AMD also has a clear advantage in ECC memory support, which is important for error-sensitive server or workstation use.

The average scores are nearly identical: 1910 for the AMD and 1881 for the Intel. Both CPUs sit at the 43rd percentile of all CPUs, and their nearest rivals list shows each is within 0.2% of the other's average. This shows that the two are overall performance equals, but they have different strengths across specific workloads. The Intel is the better pick for single-thread and mobile power efficiency, while the AMD is the better pick for modern multi-core and ECC reliability.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and the Intel Processor U300:

• Cores: AMD 4, Intel 5
• Threads: AMD 8, Intel 6
• Base Clock: AMD 3.20 GHz, Intel 1200.00 MHz
• Boost Clock: AMD 3.80 GHz, Intel 4.40 GHz
• TDP: AMD 35 W, Intel 15 W
• Socket: AMD Socket AM4, Intel BGA 1744
• Architecture: Zen, Raptor Lake
• Codename: Raven Ridge, Raptor Lake-U
• Generation: Ryzen 5 (Zen (Raven Ridge)), Intel Processor (Raptor Lake-U)
• Process Node: 14 nm, 10 nm
• Foundry: GlobalFoundries, Intel
• Transistors: 4,950 million, not listed
• Die Size: 210 mm², not listed
• L1 Cache: 96 KB per core, 80 KB per core
• L2 Cache: 512 KB per core, 1.25 MB per core
• L3 Cache: 4 MB shared, 8 MB shared
• Memory Support: DDR4, DDR4 and DDR5
• Memory Bandwidth: 46.9 GB/s, not listed
• ECC Memory: Yes, No
• PCIe: Gen 3, 8 lanes, Gen 4, 8 lanes
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon RX Vega 11, UHD Graphics 48EU
• Market Segment: Desktop, Mobile
• Release Date: 2018-05-09, 2023-01-03
• Launch MSRP: Not listed, $193
• Part Number: YD240BC6M4MFBYD240BC6FBMPK, SRMLU

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records four head-to-head benchmark results.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel Processor U300 wins with a score of 781, against the AMD's 665. The delta is 14.9% in favor of the Intel. This is a moderate win, but it is the older test and uses an older rendering workload.

In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Intel Processor 300 wins much more decisively. It scores 222 versus 93 for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE, a delta of 58.1%. This is the largest margin in any test, indicating a very strong single-thread advantage for the Intel chip.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE takes the win. It scores 6606, against Intel's 4905, with a delta of 34.7% in favor of the AMD. This is the largest multi-core win and is significant because Cinebench R23 is the newer benchmark version.

In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel Processor U300 wins again. It scores 1616 versus 932 for the AMD, a delta of 42.3% in favor of Intel.

Overall, the Intel wins three tests, the AMD wins one. However, the AMD's win is more recent and multi-core, while the Intel's wins cover both single-core and an older multi-core test.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Processor U300 wins in single-core performance across both tested versions of Cinebench. It also wins in the R15 multi-core test. The data shows that the Intel excels in workloads that rely on single-threaded speed or older multi-threaded rendering versions.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins in the modern Cinebench R23 multi-core test. This is the most relevant test for current multi-threaded workloads, indicating the AMD has superior scaling on modern rendering tasks. The AMD also supports ECC memory, making it a stronger candidate for data integrity-sensitive work, and it has a higher TDP, which may allow for more sustained performance in desktop environments.

In summary, the Intel is the winner for single-threaded and classic multi-threaded workloads, while the AMD is the winner for modern multi-threaded rendering and ECC-dependent tasks. The Intel's average score is 1881, and the AMD's is 1910, but the head-to-head results show that the choice depends on the specific benchmark and use case.