AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Intel Core i7-6700T Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
Core i7-6700T
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Intel Core i7-6700T
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is the clear winner in this comparison, taking all six head-to-head benchmark victories over the Intel Core i7-6700T. Both processors are 35W parts with 4 cores and 8 threads, but the AMD chip holds a consistent 10% performance lead across every Cinebench test, making it the superior choice for almost any workload that can use those threads.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has a base clock of 3.20 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-6700T has a base clock of 2.80 GHz.
Q: How do the two chips compare in multi-core performance?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins all three multi-core Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 6606 versus the Intel's 5943, a 10% advantage.
Q: Which processor offers a larger L3 cache?
A: The Intel Core i7-6700T has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has only 4 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: No, only the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i7-6700T does not support ECC.
Q: What is the single-core performance difference?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins every single-core benchmark. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 932 against the Intel's 839, a 10% difference.
Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has a memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, compared to the Intel Core i7-6700T's 34.1 GB/s.
Architecture Differences
The two processors are built on the same 14 nm process node but come from different foundries and design philosophies. The Intel Core i7-6700T uses the Skylake architecture, produced by Intel, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE uses the Zen architecture under the Raven Ridge codename, manufactured by GlobalFoundries. This fundamental design split explains most of the performance divergence seen in the benchmarks.
The cache hierarchy reveals a notable contrast. Intel's Skylake design allocates 64 KB of L1 cache and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, plus a large 8 MB shared L3 cache. AMD's Zen design gives each core 96 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2, but only 4 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip compensates with a larger per-core cache allocation, while the Intel chip relies on a bigger pool of shared cache.
Memory support also diverges significantly. The Intel part supports both DDR3 and DDR4 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR4. Both run dual-channel memory, but AMD's memory bandwidth is substantially higher at 46.9 GB/s versus Intel's 34.1 GB/s. ECC memory support is exclusive to the AMD chip, which is a meaningful feature for certain professional workloads.
The integrated graphics differ as well. Intel pairs the i7-6700T with HD Graphics 530, while AMD includes Radeon RX Vega 11. Both chips are locked (multiplier unlocked: false), so overclocking is not an option on either platform. The Intel processor uses Socket 1151 with 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, while the AMD processor uses Socket AM4 with only 8 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU.
Production status separates the two: the Intel chip is end-of-life, while the AMD chip is still active. The Intel part was released in 2015, while the AMD part arrived in 2018. AMD's transistor count is listed at 4,950 million on a 210 mm² die, whereas Intel's transistor count and die size are not provided in the data.
Where Each One Wins
There is no workload category where the Intel Core i7-6700T comes out ahead in the benchmark data. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins every single available test, which means it is the stronger choice for both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications.
For users prioritizing raw compute performance in rendering or CPU-heavy tasks, the AMD chip is the only logical pick. Its 10% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core (6606 versus 5943) shows a clear advantage in heavily threaded workloads. The same 10% margin applies to Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core, reinforcing the pattern.
Single-threaded performance also favors AMD, with the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE scoring 932 versus 839 in Cinebench R23 single-core. This makes it the better option for lightly threaded applications, older software, or tasks that depend on one core. The consistency of the 10% delta across all tests suggests the AMD architecture simply executes instructions more efficiently at these clock speeds.
The Intel chip does hold advantages in specific specifications, but these do not translate into benchmark wins. It has a larger L3 cache (8 MB versus 4 MB), more PCIe lanes (16 versus 8), and supports DDR3 memory. However, none of these features produce a performance victory in the measured tests.
Specification Differences
| Specification | Intel Core i7-6700T | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 2.80 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 3.60 GHz | 3.80 GHz |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Architecture | Skylake | Zen (Raven Ridge) |
| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Transistors | Not listed | 4,950 million |
| Die Size | Not listed | 210 mm² |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Memory Support | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 46.9 GB/s |
| ECC Memory | false | true |
| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 3, 8 Lanes |
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Release Date | 2015-08-31 | 2018-05-09 |
| Launch MSRP | $303 | Not listed |
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head results are remarkably consistent. Across six Cinebench tests, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins every time, with deltas ranging from 9.7% to 10%. There is no single test where the Intel chip closes the gap.
In multi-core tests, the AMD chip scores 665 versus 599 in Cinebench R15, a 9.9% advantage. Cinebench R20 shows 2774 versus 2496, a 10% lead. The largest absolute difference comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where AMD scores 6606 against Intel's 5943, again a 10% margin. These results indicate that the AMD processor scales better across all thread counts.
Single-core results follow the same pattern. Cinebench R15 single-core shows AMD at 93 versus Intel at 84, a 9.7% lead. Cinebench R20 single-core gives AMD 391 versus 352, a 10% difference. Cinebench R23 single-core shows AMD at 932 versus 839, another 10% margin. The consistency of these numbers suggests a fundamental per-clock efficiency advantage for the Zen architecture, not just a clock speed difference.
The Intel chip's higher L3 cache and additional PCIe lanes do not help it in CPU-bound rendering workloads. The AMD chip's higher memory bandwidth (46.9 GB/s versus 34.1 GB/s) may contribute to its multi-core wins, especially in tests that stress memory access patterns. Overall, the benchmark data shows a uniform 10% performance gap in favor of the AMD part, with no test showing Intel within 9% of AMD.
The Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is the definitive choice based on the benchmark data. It wins every single head-to-head test, with a consistent 10% performance advantage over the Intel Core i7-6700T. For any user who prioritizes CPU compute performance, the AMD chip is the only rational selection.
The Intel Core i7-6700T does retain advantages in specific specifications that could matter in niche scenarios. Its larger 8 MB L3 cache and 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes are notable features. The support for DDR3 memory could be relevant for someone upgrading an older system without replacing memory modules. ECC memory support on the AMD chip, however, gives it an edge for users who need data integrity in professional workloads.
Consider the Intel chip only if its specific feature set aligns with a particular use case, such as an existing DDR3 platform or a need for more PCIe lanes. The AMD chip is the better performer in every measured benchmark, and its active production status means it is still available for new builds. The Intel part is end-of-life, which could affect long-term availability and support.
For most buyers, the decision is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE offers superior performance across the board with a 10% lead in every test, while also providing ECC memory support and a more modern production status. The Intel Core i7-6700T only makes sense for those with specific hardware constraints that favor its socket, memory, or PCIe configuration.