AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE vs Intel Core i3-9350K Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a consistent picture across every Cinebench iteration: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins all six head-to-head tests, though by narrow margins. The largest advantage appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the AMD part scores 6606 against the Intel Core i3-9350K’s 6456, a delta of -2.3% from Intel’s perspective. That same 2.3% gap repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core (2774 vs 2711) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (665 vs 650).

Single-core results follow the same pattern. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE records 932, while the Core i3-9350K posts 911, again a 2.3% difference. Cinebench R20 single-core shows 391 versus 382, and Cinebench R15 single-core shows 93 versus 91, each with the same -2.2% or -2.3% delta. Notably, Intel’s higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz does not translate into a single-core victory; the AMD part’s 3.80 GHz boost still manages to lead in every test.

The average benchmark score reinforces this hierarchy. The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE sits at 1910, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Core i3-9350K averages 1867, landing in the 42nd percentile. When compared to nearest rivals, the AMD chip ties exactly with the Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 at 1910, while the Intel chip trails the Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 by only 0.1% (1869 vs 1867). These margins are tight enough that the two processors occupy essentially the same performance tier, yet the AMD part holds a small but repeatable edge in every measured workload.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data shows no workload category where the Intel Core i3-9350K takes a win. All six recorded tests, spanning three Cinebench versions and both multi-core and single-core modes, go to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE. The multi-core victories are expected given the AMD chip’s 8 threads against Intel’s 4 threads. The single-core wins are more surprising, as the Intel part has a 0.80 GHz higher boost clock, yet the AMD architecture still produces higher scores by roughly 2.2% to 2.3%.

For users focused on rendering or other multi-threaded tasks, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE offers a small but measurable advantage. For single-threaded workloads, such as older games or lightly threaded applications, the same conclusion holds: the AMD part leads, though the difference is small enough that real-world perceptibility may be limited. The data does not indicate any scenario where the Intel chip’s higher clock speed or unlocked multiplier overcomes the AMD chip’s thread count and efficiency.

The wins are consistent, but they are narrow. A 2.3% margin in Cinebench R23 multi-core translates to roughly 150 points, which is within the noise of many real-world workloads. Still, from a pure benchmark standpoint, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is the winner in six out of six tests, and the database records zero wins for the Intel part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Core i3-9350K uses the Coffee Lake architecture, built on a 14 nm process at Intel’s foundry. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE uses the Zen architecture under the Raven Ridge codename, also on a 14 nm process but fabricated by GlobalFoundries. The die sizes differ substantially: Intel’s die measures 126 mm², while AMD’s is 210 mm². AMD also lists 4,950 million transistors, whereas Intel’s transistor count is not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies diverge as well. Intel allocates 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of shared L3. AMD gives each core 96 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2, but only 4 MB of shared L3. This means the Intel chip has twice the L3 capacity, while the AMD chip has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches. In practice, the smaller L3 on the AMD side may hurt some workloads, but the benchmark data shows that the AMD chip still edges ahead across the board.

The integrated graphics differ significantly. Intel pairs the Core i3-9350K with UHD 630, while AMD includes Radeon RX Vega 11. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores, so no direct comparison is possible. However, the presence of a Vega-class iGPU on the AMD part, combined with its 35 W TDP, suggests a different target use case. The Intel chip carries a 91 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier, indicating a focus on overclocking and higher sustained clocks.

Both processors support ECC memory, use DDR4 on a dual-channel bus, and offer PCIe Gen 3 lanes. Intel provides 16 lanes from the CPU, while AMD provides 8 lanes. The memory bandwidth also differs: Intel lists 38.4 GB/s, while AMD lists 46.9 GB/s. The AMD chip’s higher memory bandwidth may contribute to its benchmark wins, particularly in memory-sensitive workloads.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ in several key specifications. The Intel Core i3-9350K has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 4.00 GHz for Intel and 3.20 GHz for AMD. Boost clocks are 4.60 GHz for Intel and 3.80 GHz for AMD. TDP ratings are 91 W for Intel and 35 W for AMD, a substantial efficiency gap.

Sockets differ: Intel uses Socket 1151, while AMD uses Socket AM4. The architectures are Coffee Lake versus Zen (Raven Ridge). Process nodes are the same at 14 nm, but foundries differ (Intel vs GlobalFoundries). L1 cache is 64 KB per core on Intel versus 96 KB per core on AMD. L2 cache is 256 KB per core on Intel versus 512 KB per core on AMD. L3 cache is 8 MB shared on Intel versus 4 MB shared on AMD.

Memory bandwidth is 38.4 GB/s on Intel versus 46.9 GB/s on AMD. PCIe lanes are 16 on Intel versus 8 on AMD. Integrated graphics are UHD 630 on Intel versus Radeon RX Vega 11 on AMD. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD part does not. Release dates differ: Intel launched on 2019-04-22, while AMD launched on 2018-05-09. Production status shows Intel as end-of-life, while AMD remains active. Intel has a launch MSRP of $184, while AMD’s launch MSRP is not recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most benchmark tests?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, recording victories in R15, R20, and R23 for both multi-core and single-core modes. The Intel Core i3-9350K records zero wins.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD part leads by 2.3% in every multi-core test. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the gap is 6606 versus 6456. In R20, it is 2774 versus 2711. In R15, it is 665 versus 650.

Q: Does the Intel chip’s higher boost clock help in single-core tests?

A: No. Despite a 4.60 GHz boost clock against AMD’s 3.80 GHz, the Intel chip loses every single-core test. The margins are 2.2% to 2.3%, with the AMD chip scoring 932 versus 911 in R23, 391 versus 382 in R20, and 93 versus 91 in R15.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i3-9350K is rated at 91 W, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is rated at 35 W. This makes the AMD part significantly more power-efficient on paper.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 1910, placing it in the 43rd percentile. The Intel part averages 1867, placing it in the 42nd percentile. The AMD chip’s nearest rival is the Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 with an identical score of 1910.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i3-9350K and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE support ECC memory. Both also use DDR4 on a dual-channel bus.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear, though narrow, winner: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE. It wins every benchmark in the database, holds a higher average score (1910 vs 1867), and sits in a higher percentile (43 vs 42). Its 8 threads give it a structural advantage in multi-threaded workloads, and its single-core performance is also slightly ahead despite a lower boost clock.

For users who prioritize power efficiency, the AMD part’s 35 W TDP versus Intel’s 91 W is a decisive factor. The AMD chip also offers a more capable integrated GPU (Radeon RX Vega 11 vs UHD 630), though no graphics benchmarks are recorded. Its active production status means it remains available, while the Intel part is end-of-life.

The Intel Core i3-9350K does have advantages in the specification sheet: a higher base clock (4.00 GHz vs 3.20 GHz), a higher boost clock (4.60 GHz vs 3.80 GHz), twice the L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB), double the PCIe lanes (16 vs 8), and an unlocked multiplier. However, none of these translate into a benchmark win in the recorded data. The unlocked multiplier could allow overclocking beyond stock performance, but the database does not include overclocked results.

Given the benchmark results, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is the recommended choice for users who want the best recorded performance, lower power draw, and an active production part. The Intel chip may appeal to users who specifically need an unlocked multiplier or more PCIe lanes, but the measured performance does not favor it in any tested workload.