AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Intel Core i5-1335UE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Intel Core i5-1335UE are statistical twins in compute performance, with the AMD part taking a razor-thin edge in every benchmark recorded. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical — 2909 for the AMD versus 2907 for the Intel, a delta of just 0.1% in favor of the Ryzen. Both processors occupy the 51st percentile of all CPUs, placing them squarely in the mid-range of the database. The most striking finding is that the Intel chip, despite being a much newer mobile part with more cores, cannot outperform the older desktop chip in any of the six Cinebench tests. This head-to-head is a lesson in how architectural generation and power envelope can offset raw core counts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results show a perfect sweep for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600, though the margins are almost imperceptible. In Cinebench R15 multicore, both processors score exactly 1013 points, resulting in a 0% delta. The single-core R15 test is equally deadlocked at 142 points each. These ties establish the baseline: the two chips are interchangeable in older rendering workloads.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the AMD chip posts 4224 points in multicore against 4221 for the Intel, a 0.1% advantage. The single-core R20 scores are identical at 595 points. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R23, where the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 scores 10058 multicore versus 10052 for the Core i5-1335UE — again a 0.1% edge. The R23 single-core test is another exact tie at 1419 points. The AMD processor wins all six recorded head-to-head comparisons, but the largest margin across any test is a mere 0.1%.

What the data does not show is any scenario where the Intel chip takes the lead. The wins for the AMD part are consistent across single-core and multi-core workloads, suggesting that the architectural efficiency of the newer Raptor Lake design is fully neutralized by the older Zen design. The 10-core Intel processor cannot convert its additional cores into a performance advantage, and the 6-core AMD chip cannot be caught on single-threaded tasks. The average benchmark scores confirm this parity: 2909 for AMD versus 2907 for Intel, a difference of only two points out of nearly three thousand.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent opposite design philosophies separated by nearly six years of semiconductor evolution. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the original Zen architecture on a 14 nm process from GlobalFoundries, packing 4,800 million transistors into a 192 mm² die. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy comprises 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR4 over a dual-channel bus, and the chip does not include integrated graphics. It is a desktop part on AMD Socket AM4 with an unlocked multiplier, and it draws a 65 W TDP.

The Intel Core i5-1335UE, by contrast, is a Raptor Lake-U mobile processor built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has 10 cores and 12 threads, which indicates a hybrid configuration, though the fact pack does not specify the performance-to-efficiency core ratio. Its base clock is listed at 1300.00 MHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache design is different: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus and includes Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. The chip uses Intel BGA 1744, has a locked multiplier, and operates at a 15 W TDP. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip is a mobile part released in 2023, whereas the AMD chip is a desktop part from 2017.

The most consequential architectural difference is the power envelope: 65 W versus 15 W. The Intel chip is designed for thin-and-light laptops, while the AMD chip is a mainstream desktop processor. Yet the 15 W part matches the 65 W part in every benchmark. This indicates that the Raptor Lake architecture delivers substantially higher performance-per-watt, though the fact pack provides no direct efficiency metrics. The AMD chip's advantage in L3 cache — 16 MB versus 12 MB — does not translate into a measurable performance lead.

Where Each One Wins

Given the benchmark parity, the decision between these two processors hinges on platform and use case rather than raw compute. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 wins in the context of desktop builds. It uses the AM4 socket, which is compatible with a wide range of motherboards, and its unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking. The 65 W TDP is suited for standard desktop cooling solutions. The data shows it edges out the Intel chip in all six Cinebench tests, making it the slightly better choice for rendering workloads that are heavily multi-threaded, such as the R23 multicore test where it scores 10058 versus 10052.

The Intel Core i5-1335UE wins in the context of mobile computing. Its 15 W TDP is a fraction of the AMD part's power draw, making it suitable for laptops where thermals and battery life are critical. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units provides a display output without a discrete GPU, which the AMD chip cannot offer. The Intel chip also supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4, offering newer platform features. The boost clock of 4.50 GHz is significantly higher than the AMD's 3.60 GHz, though the benchmark data shows this does not produce a single-core advantage in practice — both score 1419 in R23 single-core.

For users who already have an AM4 platform, the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is the logical choice. For users building or buying a thin laptop, the Core i5-1335UE is the only option with integrated graphics and a mobile form factor. The benchmark data does not favor one for any specific software category; the wins are uniformly split across all recorded tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has an average benchmark score of 2909, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-1335UE's 2907.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 scores 10058 points, while the Intel Core i5-1335UE scores 10052 points, giving the AMD chip a 0.1% lead.

Q: Do the processors have the same number of cores?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-1335UE has 10 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a TDP of 65 W, while the Intel Core i5-1335UE has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: Does the Intel chip have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-1335UE includes Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 does not have integrated graphics.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i5-1335UE supports DDR5 memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports only DDR4.

Q: Are the single-core benchmark scores identical?

A: Yes, in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 single-core tests, both processors score exactly 142, 595, and 1419 points respectively.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear picture: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is the marginally faster processor in every benchmark recorded, but the differences are so small as to be negligible in real-world use. The AMD chip wins all six head-to-head comparisons, yet the largest margin is 0.1%. Users should pick the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 if they prioritize desktop compatibility, overclocking capability, and a socket with a long upgrade history. The unlocked multiplier and 65 W TDP make it a flexible desktop part.

Users should pick the Intel Core i5-1335UE if they need a mobile processor with integrated graphics, DDR5 support, and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity. The 15 W TDP is the defining feature, enabling laptop designs that the AMD chip cannot serve. The Intel chip's 10 cores do not translate into a benchmark win, but they do not hurt either — the performance is statistically identical to the AMD part.

The verdict is essentially a platform decision. For a desktop workstation or gaming rig, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 offers a slight edge in rendering and a more overclockable platform. For a laptop or a compact mobile system, the Intel Core i5-1335UE is the only viable choice given its integrated graphics and power efficiency. Neither chip can be recommended as a clear performance winner, as the benchmark data shows they are equivalent within measurement noise.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two processors:

• Cores: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores; Intel Core i5-1335UE has 10 cores.
• Base Clock: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz; Intel Core i5-1335UE has a base clock of 1300.00 MHz.
• Boost Clock: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 boosts to 3.60 GHz; Intel Core i5-1335UE boosts to 4.50 GHz.
• TDP: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 draws 65 W; Intel Core i5-1335UE draws 15 W.
• Socket: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses AMD Socket AM4; Intel Core i5-1335UE uses Intel BGA 1744.
• Architecture: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses Zen; Intel Core i5-1335UE uses Raptor Lake.
• Process Node: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is built on 14 nm; Intel Core i5-1335UE is built on 10 nm.
• Foundry: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses GlobalFoundries; Intel Core i5-1335UE uses Intel.
• L1 Cache: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 96 KB per core; Intel Core i5-1335UE has 80 KB per core.
• L2 Cache: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 512 KB per core; Intel Core i5-1335UE has 1.25 MB per core.
• L3 Cache: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 16 MB shared; Intel Core i5-1335UE has 12 MB shared.
• Memory Support: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports DDR4; Intel Core i5-1335UE supports DDR4 and DDR5.
• PCIe: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has no PCIe data; Intel Core i5-1335UE has Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only).
• Integrated Graphics: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has none; Intel Core i5-1335UE has Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.
• Market Segment: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a Desktop part; Intel Core i5-1335UE is a Mobile part.
• Release Date: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 released 2017-06-28; Intel Core i5-1335UE released 2023-01-03.
• Multiplier Unlocked: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has an unlocked multiplier; Intel Core i5-1335UE has a locked multiplier.