AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a decisive performance advantage for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 in every shared test. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen 7 2700 scores 1551 against 782 for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, a delta of 98.3%. That is nearly double the multi-threaded output, which is exactly what the core and thread count difference would suggest. The Ryzen 7 2700 brings 8 cores and 16 threads to the table, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 fields 4 cores and 8 threads.

Single-core performance also favors the Ryzen 7 2700, though by a smaller margin. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Ryzen 7 2700 posts 161 points versus 110 for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, a 46.4% lead. This is notable because the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 actually has a higher base clock at 3.50 GHz compared to 3.20 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700. The Ryzen 7 2700 compensates with a much higher boost clock of 4.10 GHz against 3.70 GHz, and the newer 12 nm process node helps it extract more performance per clock than the older 14 nm node.

Looking at the broader average benchmark score, the Ryzen 7 2700 lands at 2320, placing it in the 48th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 averages 2246, which is the 47th percentile. The 74-point average gap is modest relative to the Cinebench R15 multi-core delta, but the advantage consistently sits with the Ryzen 7 2700.

The two chips also sit near different groups of rivals in the database. The Ryzen 7 2700 is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon E-2134 at 2319 (0% delta), the Intel Core i7-8809G at 2307 (0.6% ahead), and the Intel Core i5-10400H at 2303 (0.7% ahead). It trails the Intel Xeon E3-1285 v6 by 1.2%. The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, meanwhile, is nearly even with the Intel Core i7-10710U at 2248 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core i5-9400 at 2254 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Xeon D-1715TER at 2238 (0.4% ahead). It sits 0.6% behind the Intel Core i7-1068NG7.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear winner for users who need multi-threaded throughput: the AMD Ryzen 7 2700. Its 98.3% advantage in Cinebench R15 multi-core is the single largest recorded difference between the two, and it stems directly from having twice the physical cores and threads. Any workload that scales across cores, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, will see a near-doubling of performance on the Ryzen 7 2700.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 does have one practical edge: a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz versus 3.20 GHz. That means in lightly threaded tasks where the boost clock is not engaged, the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 can feel responsive. But the single-core benchmark tells the real story. The Ryzen 7 2700's 4.10 GHz boost clock and 12 nm process node deliver 46.4% higher Cinebench R15 single-core scores, so even in single-threaded workloads, the Ryzen 7 2700 wins.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is the better pick only for a very narrow scenario: if the workload is strictly single-threaded and the system runs at base clocks without boosting, or if the user needs the older 14 nm platform for compatibility reasons. In every recorded benchmark, the Ryzen 7 2700 wins. The verdict is straightforward. The Ryzen 7 2700 is the faster processor across the board.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 2700 wins in all measured categories. In multi-core workloads, it dominates. Cinebench R15 multi-core at 1551 versus 782 means the Ryzen 7 2700 finishes rendering tasks in roughly half the time. This matters for 3D artists, video editors, and developers running parallel builds. The 16 threads allow the operating system to schedule more concurrent work, and the 16 MB shared L3 cache helps keep all cores fed.

The Ryzen 7 2700 also wins in single-core performance. A 46.4% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core means that even tasks that use one thread, such as legacy applications or lightly threaded games, run faster on the Ryzen 7 2700. The higher boost clock of 4.10 GHz is the primary driver here. The 12 nm process node from GlobalFoundries also contributes to better efficiency per clock, which shows up as a higher score despite the lower base clock disadvantage.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has no benchmark wins in the recorded data. Its 47th percentile average score of 2246 places it slightly below the Ryzen 7 2700's 48th percentile at 2320. The only area where the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 could be preferred is in a theoretical scenario where the higher 3.50 GHz base clock matters more than boost performance. That scenario is not represented in any of the recorded tests. All benchmark results indicate the Ryzen 7 2700 is the superior choice for both multi-threaded and single-threaded work.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 2700. It scores 1551 in Cinebench R15 multi-core versus 782 for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, a 98.3% advantage.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 better in single-core performance because of its higher base clock?

A: No. Despite the 3.50 GHz base clock versus 3.20 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700, the Ryzen 7 2700 wins Cinebench R15 single-core with 161 points against 110, a 46.4% lead. The Ryzen 7 2700's higher 4.10 GHz boost clock matters more.

Q: How do these chips compare in overall average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 2700 averages 2320, placing it in the 48th percentile of all CPUs. The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 averages 2246, placing it in the 47th percentile.

Q: What are the closest rivals for each processor in the database?

A: The Ryzen 7 2700 is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon E-2134 at 2319 (0% delta), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is nearly even with the Intel Core i7-10710U at 2248 (0.1% behind).

Q: Do both processors support the same memory type?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Ryzen 7 2700 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, both have the multiplier unlocked, so enthusiasts can adjust clock speeds on either chip.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same Zen architecture and codename, but they come from different generations and process nodes. The Ryzen 7 2700 is part of the 2000 series, built on the 12 nm node at GlobalFoundries. Its generation is listed as Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)). The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 belongs to the 1000 series, built on the 14 nm node, also at GlobalFoundries, with the generation listed as Ryzen 5 (Zen (Summit Ridge)).

The core counts differ significantly. The Ryzen 7 2700 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has 4 cores and 8 threads. Both share the same per-core cache layout: 96 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core. The L3 cache is also identical at 16 MB shared across all cores. The transistor count is the same at 4,800 million for both, but the die size differs. The Ryzen 7 2700 has a die size of 213 mm², while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has a smaller die at 192 mm². This makes sense because the Ryzen 7 2700 packs double the cores onto a slightly larger die, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 uses a smaller die with fewer active cores.

The process node difference is the key architectural distinction. The 12 nm node on the Ryzen 7 2700 is a refinement of the 14 nm node used on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500. This allows the Ryzen 7 2700 to reach a higher 4.10 GHz boost clock while maintaining the same 65 W TDP as the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, which boosts to only 3.70 GHz. Both processors use the AMD Socket AM4, and both lack integrated graphics. Neither supports ECC memory according to the recorded data.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. Core and thread counts are the most obvious: the Ryzen 7 2700 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks differ as well, with the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 running at 3.50 GHz compared to 3.20 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700. The boost clocks reverse the order, with the Ryzen 7 2700 hitting 4.10 GHz versus 3.70 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500.

The process node separates the generations: 12 nm for the Ryzen 7 2700 and 14 nm for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500. The die size also differs at 213 mm² for the Ryzen 7 2700 and 192 mm² for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500. The release dates are about ten months apart, with the Ryzen 7 2700 launching on 2018-04-18 and the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 launching on 2017-06-28. The Ryzen 7 2700 has a recorded launch MSRP of $299, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has no launch MSRP in the database.

Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the Ryzen 7 2700 at 46.9 GB/s; the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has no figure listed. PCIe specifications also differ: the Ryzen 7 2700 lists Gen 3 with 16 Lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has no PCIe data recorded. Both have unlocked multipliers, both support DDR4 dual-channel memory, and both lack ECC support and integrated graphics. The part numbers are YD2700BBM88AF for the Ryzen 7 2700 and YD150BBBM4GAE for the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500.