AMD Ryzen 5 9500F vs Intel Core i7-13850HX Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 9500F
Core i7-13850HX
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F vs Intel Core i7-13850HX
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and Intel Core i7-13850HX represent two fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD part is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel chip uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant, on Intel's 10 nm process. This process gap is significant: the AMD chip packs 8,315 million transistors into a 70.6 mm² die, while the Intel die is substantially larger at 257 mm². The smaller process node gives AMD a density advantage, though Intel compensates with a hybrid architecture approach.
Core counts differ dramatically. The Ryzen 5 9500F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor with all cores based on the same Zen 5 design. The Core i7-13850HX is a 20-core, 28-thread mobile part using a hybrid layout, though the database does not break down performance versus efficiency core counts. That core disparity alone explains many benchmark differences, as the Intel chip has more than three times the core count.
Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both share the same L1 cache at 80 KB per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD uses 1 MB per core, while Intel uses 2 MB per core. L3 cache is similar in total size: AMD offers 32 MB shared, Intel offers 30 MB shared. So the Intel part has a larger per-core L2 allocation, which can help in latency-sensitive workloads.
The AMD chip is a desktop processor, while the Intel chip is mobile, soldered to the BGA 1964 socket. AMD uses the AM5 socket, which is user-replaceable. Intel's integrated graphics are present (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 9500F has no integrated graphics at all. The AMD part also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes, versus Intel's Gen 5 with 20 lanes. Both support ECC memory. The AMD chip uses DDR5 only, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, which offers more flexibility in memory selection.
Specification Differences
The two chips differ in nearly every specification category. The Ryzen 5 9500F has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Core i7-13850HX starts at a lower 2.10 GHz base but boosts higher to 5.30 GHz. The TDP ratings are close: 65 W for AMD versus 55 W for Intel, a 10 W difference.
Core and thread counts are the largest gap. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads; the Intel has 20 cores and 28 threads. That is 14 more cores and 16 more threads on the Intel side.
Memory bandwidth is only stated for the AMD chip: 89.6 GB/s, running dual-channel DDR5. The Intel chip does not have a listed bandwidth number, but supports dual-channel memory with both DDR4 and DDR5.
The integrated GPU is a major differentiator. The Ryzen 5 9500F has none, while the Core i7-13850HX ships with UHD Graphics 770. For systems without a discrete GPU, the Intel part can output video; the AMD chip cannot.
The Ryzen 5 9500F has an unlocked multiplier (as does the Intel), but the AMD part is listed with a launch MSRP of $219, while the Intel's launch MSRP is $428. The AMD chip's part number is 100-000001406 and was released in September 2025. The Intel part, number SRMEA, shipped in January 2023. Both are listed as Active in production status.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core i7-13850HX has 20 cores and 28 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part has 14 more cores and 16 more threads.
Q: Why does the AMD chip win some benchmarks despite fewer cores?
A: The Ryzen 5 9500F has a higher base clock (3.80 GHz vs 2.10 GHz) and a newer 4 nm process. It wins the PassMark single-thread test by 13%, scoring 4258 versus 3769, and also wins the find-prime-numbers test by 19.6%.
Q: Can either chip work without a dedicated graphics card?
A: Only the Intel Core i7-13850HX has integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770). The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.
Q: Which chip has a larger L2 cache?
A: The Intel chip has 2 MB per core, while the AMD chip has 1 MB per core. The Intel part also has a slightly smaller L3 cache (30 MB vs 32 MB).
Q: Which processor is older?
A: The Intel Core i7-13850HX was released in January 2023. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F came later, with a release date in September 2025.
Q: Which chip ranks higher in the database?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F sits at the 91st percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 52873. The Intel Core i7-13850HX is at the 90th percentile, with an average score of 50761. The margin is about 4%.
The Verdict
The data points to a clear split by use case. For single-threaded and latency-sensitive tasks, the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is the winner. It leads by 13% in PassMark single-thread score (4258 vs 3767) and wins the prime-number test by 19.6%. It also has a higher base clock, a smaller process node, and a higher average benchmark score (52873 vs 50761). It ranks in the 91st percentile, one point above the Intel's 90th.
For heavily multithreaded workloads, the Intel Core i7-13850HX dominates. It wins 8 out of 11 head-to-head benchmark tests, including the multi-thread test by 23.2% (36870 vs 28312), floating-point math by 38.3%, and integer math by 33.4%. The extra cores and threads simply overwhelm the AMD's architectural advantages.
The choice comes down to workload. A desktop user who runs single-threaded applications, or wants the higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s) and lower launch price, should pick the Ryzen 5 9500F. A user who needs heavy multi-threading, or requires integrated graphics for a system without a video card, should pick the Intel Core i7-13850HX. The Intel chip also offers DDR4 compatibility, which can matter for system upgrades.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Intel Core i7-13850HX is the clear winner in the PassMark suite, taking 8 of 11 tests. Its largest advantage comes in data compression, where it scores 441525 versus the AMD's 325678, a 26.2% lead. The encryption test shows an even bigger gap: Intel 26062, AMD 15716, a delta of 39.7%. Floating-point math also favors the Intel heavily: 92319 versus 56570, 38.9% ahead. Integer math follows the same pattern: 126852 versus 84198, Intel leads by 33.6%. The multi-thread benchmark goes to Intel 36830 vs 28355, 23.2% ahead. Physics, random string sorting, and extended instructions round out the Intel wins, with deltas of 25.5%, 30.5%, and 0.8% respectively.
The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F wins the single-thread test by 13%, scoring 4258 versus 3767. It also wins the prime-number test by 19.6%, scoring 220 against 184. The third AMD win is a narrow one in extended instructions, but that is actually an Intel win in the head-to-head list (26,586 vs 26,370, a 0.8% Intel advantage). So the AMD's true wins are single-thread and prime-number tests.
Looking at the averages, the AMD chip has a higher overall benchmark average (52873 vs 50761) despite losing most head-to-head tests. This is because the AMD's single-thread and prime-number wins are large enough to lift its average, and its scores in other tests are closer than the raw deltas suggest. The Intel's multi-thread and math wins are large, but the AMD's single-thread advantage plus its higher placement in the percentile ranking (91st vs 90th) balance the overall picture.
The delta percentages tell the story: the Intel's wins are often large (30% to 40% in math and compression), while the AMD's wins are smaller but meaningful (13% single-thread, 19.6% prime). For users who care about peak multi-thread throughput, the Intel is the stronger choice. For users who care about single-thread responsiveness and overall efficiency, the AMD holds its ground.