AMD Ryzen 5 9500F vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

CORE STATE Granite Ridge
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 32 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-14490F

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
325,678
340,026
passmark_data_encryption
15,716
18,225
passmark_extended_instructions
26,370
21,731
passmark_find_prime_numbers
220
122
passmark_floating_point_math
56,570
66,558
passmark_integer_math
84,198
87,844
passmark_multithread
28,312
28,662
passmark_physics
1,851
2,093
passmark_random_string_sorting
34,174
35,608
passmark_single_thread
4,258
3,873
passmark_singlethread
4,258
3,873
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,318
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
327
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,660
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,363
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
23,000
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,247

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F vs Intel Core i5-14490F

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The PassMark suite records 11 comparable workloads between the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and the Intel Core i5-14490F. The Intel part takes 7 wins, while the AMD processor claims 4. The largest margin belongs to the AMD side. In the prime number search test, the Ryzen 5 9500F scores 220 against Intel's 122, a delta of 80.3%. That is the single biggest gap in either direction across the entire benchmark set.

The AMD processor also leads clearly in extended instructions, scoring 26,370 versus 21,731, a 21.3% advantage. Single-thread performance favors AMD as well: the Ryzen 5 9500F records 4,258 points in both single-thread tests, while the Intel chip scores 3,873, a 9.9% difference. These three wins show where the Zen 5 architecture pulls ahead: raw per-core throughput and specialized instruction workloads.

The Intel Core i5-14490F answers with consistent wins across the remaining workloads. Data compression goes to Intel at 340,026 versus 325,678, a 4.2% edge. Data encryption favors Intel more decisively: 18,225 against 15,716, a 13.8% margin. Floating point math shows a 15% gap, with Intel scoring 66,558 and AMD at 56,570. Integer math is close, Intel at 87,844 versus 84,198, a 4.2% difference. Random string sorting goes to Intel by 4% (35,608 vs 34,174). Physics simulation favors Intel by 11.6%, 2,093 vs 1,851. The multithread score is nearly even, Intel at 28,662 and AMD at 28,312, a 1.2% margin.

The overall benchmark average confirms the split. The Ryzen 5 9500F sits at 52,873 average benchmark score, while the Core i5-14490F averages 38,149. That difference is explained by the fact that AMD's average includes its strong single-thread and extended instruction results, whereas Intel's average is pulled down by its weaker prime number and single-thread scores. The percentile ranking places AMD at 91st percentile of all CPUs, Intel at 86th. Both processors sit within 1% of their nearest rivals in the database, with AMD's closest competitor being the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 at a -0.1% delta, and Intel's closest being the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at -0.1%.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F wins in workloads that depend on single-core speed and instruction-level parallelism. The prime number test, which is heavily dependent on integer division and loop efficiency, shows an 80.3% advantage. Extended instruction workloads, which exercise SIMD and newer instruction set extensions, favor AMD by 21.3%. Single-threaded applications, represented by the 4,258 score on both single-thread tests, give AMD a 9.9% lead. These results indicate that lightly threaded tasks, such as older games, scripting workloads, or latency-sensitive applications, will see a measurable benefit on the AMD part.

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in throughput-oriented tasks. Data compression and encryption both show double-digit or near-double-digit margins, with encryption at 13.8% and compression at 4.2%. Floating point math, which includes heavy numerical computation, gives Intel a 15% edge. Physics simulation, often used as a proxy for game physics or scientific simulation, favors Intel by 11.6%. Integer math and random string sorting are closer, but still Intel wins. The multithread score, which reflects overall parallel processing capability, goes to Intel, but only by 1.2%. For users running heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or database operations, the Intel part shows an advantage.

The wins are not uniform in magnitude. AMD's prime number lead is massive, but that test is narrow. Intel's floating point and encryption wins are broad and applicable to real-world scientific and security workloads. The multithread gap is small enough to be considered a tie in practice, despite Intel taking the win.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F uses Zen 5 architecture on the Granite Ridge codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, on a 10 nm process at Intel. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which explains part of the efficiency and clock behavior.

Core counts differ substantially. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel provides 10 cores and 16 threads, using a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores. The base clocks reflect this: AMD runs at 3.80 GHz base, Intel at 2.50 GHz base. Both boost to 5.00 GHz. The higher base clock on AMD suggests better sustained per-core performance at lower loads, while Intel's lower base clock is offset by more cores.

Cache configurations also differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. AMD uses 1 MB of L2 per core, Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The shared L3 cache is larger on AMD: 32 MB versus 24 MB on Intel. The total transistor count for AMD is 8,315 million, while Intel's is not recorded. The die size tells a different story: AMD's die is 70.6 mm², Intel's is 215 mm². That size difference reflects the process node advantage and the different core layouts.

Memory support separates them. AMD supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a measured bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is supported on AMD, not on Intel. PCIe lanes also differ: AMD provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, Intel is locked. Integrated graphics are absent on both.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F scores 4,258 in both single-thread tests, while the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 3,873. That is a 9.9% advantage for AMD.

Q: Does the Intel part win in multithreaded workloads?

A: Yes, but narrowly. The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 28,662 versus 28,312 for the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, a 1.2% difference.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The prime number test shows an 80.3% lead for the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, with a score of 220 versus 122 for the Intel Core i5-14490F.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not.

Q: How do the memory support options differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no bandwidth figure is recorded.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F ranks at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14490F ranks at the 86th percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 9500F | Intel Core i5-14490F |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 70.6 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 5, 24 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Launch MSRP | $219 | Not recorded |

The specifications show a clear trade-off: AMD uses fewer cores but a more advanced process and larger L3 cache. Intel uses more cores and a larger die, but older process technology. The base clock difference (3.80 GHz vs 2.50 GHz) is notable, though both reach the same 5.00 GHz boost.

The Verdict

The data supports a split decision based on workload type. For single-threaded and instruction-heavy tasks, the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is the stronger choice. Its 9.9% single-thread lead, 21.3% extended instruction advantage, and 80.3% prime number margin are decisive. The 91st percentile ranking and the larger L3 cache reinforce this profile.

For multithreaded and data-intensive workloads, the Intel Core i5-14490F takes the edge. It wins 7 of the 11 head-to-head benchmarks, including data compression, encryption, floating point math, and physics. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration provides more parallel resources, and the results show in the multithread score, even if the margin is slim.

The average benchmark score favors AMD (52,873 vs 38,149), but that average is weighted by AMD's strong single-thread results. The percentile gap (91 vs 86) is meaningful but not overwhelming. The Core i5-14490F sits within 0.3% of its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F within 0.8%. Both are competitive in their respective strengths.

The AMD part offers ECC memory support, an unlocked multiplier, and a smaller die on a more advanced process. The Intel part offers DDR4 compatibility, more cores, and a higher L2 cache per core. The launch MSRP for the AMD is $219; no launch MSRP is recorded for the Intel.

Users prioritizing per-core performance, instruction throughput, or ECC reliability should select the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F. Users prioritizing parallel throughput, data compression, or encryption should select the Intel Core i5-14490F. The multithread score difference is only 1.2%, so the Intel advantage there is marginal. The single-thread difference is 9.9%, which is more substantial. The data does not declare an overall winner; it declares two distinct strengths.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 9500F
i5-14490F
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.8
2.5 -34.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.8
2.5 -34.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5 0.0%
Multiplier
38
25 -34.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
32 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
65 0.0%
PL1
65 W
PL2
148 W
PPT
88 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Granite Ridge
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge))
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,315 million
Die Size
70.6 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 5, 24 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1800 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$219
Part Number
100-000001406
SRN35
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Stealth
View Ryzen 5 9500F Details View Core i5-14490F Details