AMD Ryzen 5 9500F vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and the Intel Core 7 350 are both six-core processors, but they target entirely different segments of the market. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap, with the AMD chip winning all 11 recorded head-to-head tests. The largest margin is in integer math, where the Ryzen 5 9500F scores 84,198 against the Intel Core 7 350's 33,734, a 149.6% advantage. Data compression also shows a massive gap, with the AMD part at 325,678 versus 143,123, a 127.6% lead. Extended instructions follow closely, with the Ryzen 5 9500F at 26,370 against 12,045, a 118.9% difference.

The single-threaded contest is the only close call. The Ryzen 5 9500F scores 4,258 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the Intel Core 7 350 scores 4,100, giving the AMD chip a modest 3.9% lead. This indicates that while the Intel part is competitive in lightly threaded workloads, it falls behind quickly once more cores are engaged. The multithread test shows the Ryzen 5 9500F at 28,312 versus 15,170 for the Intel Core 7 350, an 86.6% advantage. The physics test also favors AMD, with scores of 1,851 and 1,173 respectively, a 57.8% lead. Floating-point math shows a 32.1% gap, with 56,570 against 42,809.

The remaining tests continue the trend. Find prime numbers shows the Ryzen 5 9500F at 220 versus 107, a 105.6% lead. Random string sorting has the AMD part at 34,174 against 17,238, a 98.2% advantage. Data encryption shows 15,716 versus 10,933, a 43.7% lead. These results confirm that the Ryzen 5 9500F delivers roughly double the throughput of the Intel Core 7 350 in several compute-heavy tasks, while the Intel chip's only competitive showing is in single-thread performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in their fundamental design. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, built on a 3 nm process at Intel. The database does not list transistor count or die size for the Intel part, so a direct transistor-density comparison is not possible from the recorded data.

Threading is a major differentiator. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. This means the AMD chip can process two instruction streams per core, effectively doubling its scheduling capacity in multithreaded workloads. The Intel part is limited to one thread per core, which explains much of the observed performance gap in tests like multithread and integer math.

Cache hierarchies also differ substantially. The Ryzen 5 9500F has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and a much smaller 6 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD part's larger L3 pool is likely a factor in its superior data compression and random string sorting scores, as those workloads benefit from keeping more working data close to the cores.

Clock speeds tell another story. The Ryzen 5 9500F has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 7 350 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The low base clock on the Intel part is typical of a mobile-focused design, but its boost clock comes within 200 MHz of the AMD chip. The single-thread test results reflect this, with only a 3.9% gap between them.

Memory support is a critical split. The Ryzen 5 9500F supports DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and it supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 350 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but over a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth, and it has no ECC support. The AMD part's higher memory bandwidth is another contributor to its large leads in memory-sensitive benchmarks.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The Ryzen 5 9500F provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with only 6 lanes. Integrated graphics are present only on the Intel part: Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD chip has no integrated graphics, which is typical for an F-series part.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data records 11 wins for the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and zero wins for the Intel Core 7 350. The AMD part dominates every category, but the margin varies by workload type. The largest leads are in integer math (149.6%), data compression (127.6%), and extended instructions (118.9%). These are heavily parallel tasks that benefit from both higher thread counts and larger caches. The Ryzen 5 9500F's 12 threads and 32 MB L3 cache give it a structural advantage that the Intel chip cannot overcome.

The smallest gaps are in single-thread performance (3.9%) and floating-point math (32.1%). In single-threaded tasks, the Intel Core 7 350's high boost clock of 4.80 GHz nearly matches the AMD chip's 5.00 GHz boost. This makes the Intel part a reasonable choice for legacy applications or lightly threaded software that does not scale beyond one or two cores. The floating-point gap is moderate, meaning the Intel chip can handle scientific or financial workloads with acceptable performance, though it still trails.

The middle range of tests, including multithread (86.6%), random string sorting (98.2%), and find prime numbers (105.6%), shows a consistent pattern. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F roughly doubles the Intel Core 7 350's output in these areas. The physics test shows a 57.8% lead for AMD, and data encryption shows a 43.7% lead. For users running simulation software, encryption workloads, or data processing, the AMD chip is the clear choice.

The Intel Core 7 350's only practical advantage is its mobile form factor. It is a BGA 1516 part with a 15 W TDP, designed for compact systems. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F uses Socket AM5 with a 65 W TDP, which requires a larger cooling solution and a desktop-class motherboard. The Intel part's integrated graphics also makes it usable without a discrete GPU, while the AMD chip requires one.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 350 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. TDP is a major split: 65 W for AMD versus 15 W for Intel. The AMD part has 12 threads versus 6 threads for Intel. The AMD chip uses Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses BGA 1516.

Memory support differs in type and width. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X on a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. ECC is supported only on the AMD part. PCIe generation and lane count also differ: Gen 5 with 24 lanes for AMD, Gen 4 with 6 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics exist only on the Intel part, with Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe).

Cache sizes are different at every level. The AMD part has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. The Intel part has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. Process node differs: 4 nm TSMC for AMD versus 3 nm Intel for the Intel part. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked. Release dates differ as well: the AMD part is dated 2025-09-07 and the Intel part is dated 2026-04-15.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 threads. This is because the AMD chip supports simultaneous multithreading, while the Intel part does not.

Q: How much faster is the AMD chip in multithread benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 9500F scores 28,312 in the PassMark multithread test, which is 86.6% higher than the Intel Core 7 350's score of 15,170.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 7 350 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The AMD part uses dual-channel memory, while the Intel part uses single-channel.

Q: Which chip has a higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F scores 4,258 in the single-thread test, a 3.9% lead over the Intel Core 7 350's 4,100. The margin is small, but the AMD chip wins.

Q: Is there integrated graphics on either processor?

A: Only the Intel Core 7 350 has integrated graphics, using Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has no integrated graphics and requires a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has a TDP of 65 W, while the Intel Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 W. The Intel part is designed for low-power mobile systems.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F wins all 11 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, with the largest margins exceeding 100% in integer math, data compression, and extended instructions. Its 12 threads, 32 MB L3 cache, and dual-channel DDR5 support give it a structural advantage in nearly every workload category. The Intel Core 7 350 is only competitive in the single-thread test, where its 4.80 GHz boost clock keeps the gap to 3.9%.

The Intel Core 7 350's strengths lie outside raw compute. Its 15 W TDP and BGA 1516 socket target compact, low-power devices, and its integrated graphics remove the need for a separate GPU. Its 3 nm process node is a generation ahead of the AMD part's 4 nm node, and its larger L1 and L2 caches per core show thoughtful design for its intended segment. However, the recorded benchmarks show that these features do not translate into competitive performance against the Ryzen 5 9500F.

For desktop builders who need maximum throughput in multithreaded applications, the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is the only choice between these two. Its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support high-end storage and graphics. For mobile system designers who prioritize power efficiency and integrated graphics, the Intel Core 7 350 serves a different purpose. The database's percentile rankings reflect this split: the AMD part sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 71st. The Ryzen 5 9500F also carries a launch MSRP of $219, while the Intel Core 7 350 has a launch MSRP of $469. The benchmark results confirm what those positions imply: the AMD chip is the higher performer, while the Intel chip is a specialized low-power part.