AMD Ryzen 5 8640U vs Intel Core i7-1370P Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

CORE STATE Hawk Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-1370P

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-P
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1900 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,663
1,649
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
256
232
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
10,433
16,365
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,651
2,310
geekbench_multicore
8,185
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
2,131
N/A
passmark_data_compression
230,080
217,676
passmark_data_encryption
14,013
13,067
passmark_extended_instructions
16,500
12,822
passmark_find_prime_numbers
69
97
passmark_floating_point_math
40,330
54,105
passmark_integer_math
68,051
78,675
passmark_multithread
20,322
20,303
passmark_physics
1,033
1,466
passmark_random_string_sorting
28,066
23,580
passmark_single_thread
3,534
3,557
passmark_singlethread
3,534
3,557
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
6,873
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
970

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 8640U vs Intel Core i7-1370P

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a closely contested matchup between the Intel Core i7-1370P and the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, with Intel securing 8 wins and AMD taking 7 in the head-to-head tests. The most dramatic divergence appears in multi-core rendering workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 16,365 against AMD's 10,433, a 56.9% advantage for Intel. This is the single largest delta in the entire comparison and reflects the substantial core-count difference between the two processors.

However, the Cinebench R15 multi-core test tells a different story. Here, AMD edges out Intel with a score of 1,663 versus 1,649, a margin of just 0.8%. This inconsistency between R15 and R23 results suggests that the two processors scale differently depending on the workload's threading characteristics and duration. The R23 result, being a longer and more demanding workload, likely favors Intel's higher thread count of 20 versus AMD's 12.

Single-core performance shows a similar split. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel leads with 2,310 points against AMD's 1,651, a 39.9% advantage. Yet in Cinebench R15 single-core, AMD wins with 256 points versus Intel's 232, a 9.4% lead. This reversal is noteworthy, as it indicates that AMD's Zen 4 architecture has a clear edge in shorter, lower-intensity single-threaded bursts, while Intel's Raptor Lake architecture pulls ahead when the workload extends over a longer duration.

The PassMark suite reveals a more balanced picture. In integer math, Intel wins decisively with 78,675 versus 68,051, a 15.6% margin. Floating-point math also goes to Intel by a wide margin: 54,105 versus 40,330, a 34.2% advantage. The prime number finding test shows Intel with 97 points versus AMD's 69, a 40.6% lead, and the physics test goes to Intel with 1,466 versus 1,033, a 41.9% margin.

AMD strikes back in several specialized PassMark tests. Extended instructions go to AMD with 16,500 versus 12,822, a 22.3% lead. Random string sorting favors AMD with 28,066 versus 23,580, a 16% advantage. Data compression and encryption also go to AMD, with scores of 230,080 versus 217,676 (5.4% lead) and 14,013 versus 13,067 (6.8% lead), respectively.

The overall multithread score is almost a dead heat. AMD scores 20,322 against Intel's 20,303, a difference of just 0.1%. Similarly, in single-thread PassMark, Intel wins by a razor-thin margin: 3,557 versus 3,534, a 0.7% lead. The passmark_singlethread test repeats this identical result, confirming consistency in that measurement.

Where Each One Wins

The data indicates that the Intel Core i7-1370P is the preferred choice for compute-heavy, multi-threaded rendering and number-crunching tasks. Its 56.9% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 39.9% lead in R23 single-core make it the stronger option for content creation, 3D rendering, and CPU-bound professional applications that sustain high load over extended periods. The 34.2% advantage in floating-point math further reinforces this, as that metric often correlates with scientific computing, financial modeling, and physics simulations. The 41.9% win in PassMark physics also points to an edge in gaming physics calculations and similar real-time simulations.

Conversely, the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U demonstrates superiority in memory-access-heavy and data-movement tasks. The 22.3% lead in extended instructions suggests better optimization for AVX-512 or similar wide vector workloads, which benefit from AMD's Zen 4 design. The 16% advantage in random string sorting indicates faster memory access patterns, likely aided by the Zen 4 memory subsystem. Data compression and encryption wins, at 5.4% and 6.8% respectively, make the AMD part the better fit for file archiving, database operations, and VPN or disk encryption scenarios.

For single-threaded responsiveness in short bursts, the Cinebench R15 single-core result gives AMD a 9.4% edge, which could translate to snappier application launch times and lower-latency interactions in lighter workloads. However, the PassMark single-thread score favors Intel by 0.7%, so the real-world difference in everyday use is likely minimal.

The near-identical multithread scores (0.1% apart) and passmark_single_thread scores (0.7% apart) suggest that for many general-purpose multi-tasking scenarios, users would be hard-pressed to notice a performance difference between the two without running specialized benchmarks.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i7-1370P is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-P variant, using Intel's 10 nm process node. It houses 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that relies on Intel's hybrid design combining performance and efficiency cores. The die size is 217 mm². The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 24 MB shared. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640U is based on Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, all based on a unified core design. The die size is 178 mm², and the chip integrates 25,000 million transistors. Cache allocations are smaller per core: L1 is 64 KB per core, L2 is 1 MB per core, and L3 is 16 MB shared. The integrated graphics are Radeon 760M.

The process node difference is substantial: Intel uses 10 nm while AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC. This explains part of the efficiency and density advantage for AMD, despite the smaller cache and fewer cores. The transistor count for AMD is listed at 25,000 million, while Intel's transistor count is not recorded in the database. The die size difference (217 mm² for Intel versus 178 mm² for AMD) is relatively modest given the core count disparity.

Memory support differs as well. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but AMD's memory bandwidth is listed at 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's memory bandwidth is not recorded. Neither processor supports ECC memory. Both offer PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

The sockets are incompatible: Intel uses BGA 1744, while AMD uses Socket FP8. AMD's part number list includes multiple variants (FP7r2, FP7, FP8), indicating broader platform compatibility within AMD's mobile lineup.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. Core count: Intel has 14 cores versus AMD's 6. Thread count: Intel has 20 threads versus AMD's 12. Base clock: AMD runs at 3.50 GHz versus Intel's 1.90 GHz. Boost clock: Intel reaches 5.20 GHz versus AMD's 4.90 GHz. Both have a TDP of 28 W.

Cache hierarchy differs significantly: Intel provides 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. AMD provides 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Process node: Intel uses 10 nm, AMD uses 4 nm. Foundry: Intel fabricates in-house, AMD uses TSMC. Die size: Intel is 217 mm², AMD is 178 mm². Transistor count: AMD lists 25,000 million, Intel does not list a figure.

Memory support: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, AMD supports DDR5 only. Memory bandwidth: AMD lists 89.6 GB/s, Intel does not list a figure. Integrated graphics: Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, AMD uses Radeon 760M. Release date: Intel launched on 2023-01-03, AMD on 2023-12-05. Launch MSRP: Intel is listed at $438, AMD has no listed MSRP. Sockets: Intel uses BGA 1744, AMD uses Socket FP8.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-1370P scores 16,365 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 56.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U's score of 10,433.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U faster in any multi-core benchmark?

A: Yes, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U scores 1,663 versus Intel's 1,649, a 0.8% advantage. Additionally, in PassMark multithread, AMD scores 20,322 versus Intel's 20,303, a 0.1% lead.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-1370P has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640U has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-1370P has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U's boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How do the cache sizes compare?

A: The Intel Core i7-1370P has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640U has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3.

Q: Which processor wins in data encryption and compression tests?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8640U wins in both. It scores 14,013 in data encryption versus Intel's 13,067 (a 6.8% lead) and 230,080 in data compression versus Intel's 217,676 (a 5.4% lead).

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 8640U
i7-1370P
Core Specs
Cores
6
14 +133.3%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.5
1,900 +54185.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.2 +6.1%
Frequency (GHz)
3.5
1,900 +54185.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.2 +6.1%
Multiplier
35
19 -45.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
28 0.0%
PL1
—
28 W
PL2
—
64 W
Configurable TDP
15-30 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Raptor Lake
Codename
Hawk Point
Raptor Lake-P
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Core i7 (Raptor Lake-P)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
25,000 million
—
Die Size
178 mm²
217 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
No
No
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel BGA 1744
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
—
1400 MHz up to 3.9 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 16 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 760M
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$438
Part Number
100-000001324(FP7r2)100-000001376(FP7)100-000001313(FP8)
SRMJ6
Package
FP8, FP7, FP7r2
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen 5 8640U Details View Core i7-1370P Details