AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS and Intel Core i7-14701TE are closely matched competitors, sitting within 0.4% of each other in average benchmark score. The AMD chip averages 26,106 points to Intel’s 26,013, yet their performance profiles could not be more different. The Ryzen 5 8640HS claims victory in 9 of the 15 head-to-head tests, while the Core i7-14701TE takes 6, but the margin of those wins matters more than the count. This is a classic split between efficiency-minded mobile silicon and a power-hungry desktop part with a higher ceiling.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic separation comes in single-threaded workloads, where the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS delivers a decisive blow. In PassMark’s single-thread test, the AMD processor scores 3,584 against Intel’s 2,637, a 35.9% advantage. That gap is nearly mirrored in Cinebench R15 single-core, where AMD leads 268 to 242, a 10.7% margin. The Ryzen’s higher base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz, combined with its newer Zen 4 architecture, clearly pay off in latency-sensitive tasks.

Intel’s strongest counterpunch arrives in sustained multi-core rendering. The Core i7-14701TE crushes the Ryzen in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 17,035 against 11,486, a 32.6% deficit for AMD. That result reflects Intel’s 8 cores and 16 threads versus AMD’s 6 cores and 12 threads, plus a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The same pattern appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel wins 2,405 to 1,711, a 28.9% lead, despite losing the older R15 single-core test. This inversion suggests Intel’s architectural efficiency improves under newer and longer-running workloads.

The PassMark suite reveals a more nuanced battlefield. AMD wins data compression 226,544 to 220,520 (2.7%), data encryption 13,551 to 11,699 (15.8%), extended instructions 15,855 to 14,354 (10.5%), integer math 68,173 to 65,792 (3.6%), and random string sorting 27,316 to 22,760 (20%). Intel takes floating-point math 50,219 to 39,725 (20.9%) and find prime numbers 143 to 70 (51%). The prime number result is the single largest percentage swing in either direction, highlighting Intel’s strength in repetitive integer loops.

In aggregate multi-threaded PassMark, the two are nearly inseparable: Intel edges AMD 20,042 to 19,889, a negligible 0.8% difference. The physics test tells a different story, with Intel dominating 1,860 to 970, a 47.8% gap. Overall, the data shows AMD winning the majority of tests but losing the ones that matter most for heavy compute, while Intel’s wins tend to be larger in magnitude.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS is the clear choice for single-thread responsiveness and encryption-heavy workflows. Its 35.9% lead in PassMark single-thread and 15.8% advantage in data encryption make it suitable for interactive applications, password management, and secure communication tasks. The 20% edge in random string sorting also points to strength in database indexing or text-processing workloads. With 9 wins across the benchmark suite, AMD demonstrates broad competence in everyday computing tasks, from compression (2.7% lead) to integer math (3.6% lead).

The Intel Core i7-14701TE is built for raw compute throughput. Its 32.6% victory in Cinebench R23 multi-core signals superiority in video rendering, 3D modeling, and compiler workloads that scale across cores. The 20.9% lead in floating-point math suggests advantages in scientific simulations and financial modeling. The 51% gap in prime number finding indicates exceptional performance in specific algorithmic loops, and the 47.8% physics win points to strength in game physics or engineering simulations. For any task that can saturate 8 cores and 16 threads, Intel’s higher core count and 33 MB of shared L3 cache provide a substantial buffer.

The PassMark multithread result, where Intel leads by just 0.8%, shows that AMD’s 6-core design is remarkably efficient at keeping pace in mixed workloads, but it cannot match Intel’s peak throughput in heavily threaded applications. Users who prioritize burst performance, encryption, or single-core speed should favor AMD, while those who need sustained multi-core muscle should look to Intel.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD’s Ryzen 5 8640HS is built on a 4 nm TSMC process with Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point. It packs 25,000 million transistors into a 178 mm² die. Intel’s Core i7-14701TE uses a 10 nm Intel process with Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, on a larger 257 mm² die. The process node difference explains much of the efficiency gap: AMD achieves its performance at a 28 W TDP, while Intel requires 45 W.

Core configurations diverge sharply. AMD offers 6 cores and 12 threads, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel counters with 8 cores and 16 threads, featuring 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a much larger 33 MB shared L3 cache. The extra L3 cache gives Intel a significant advantage in data-heavy workloads, while AMD’s smaller cache is compensated by higher clock speeds and better instruction-level parallelism.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports only DDR5 dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 dual-channel, though its memory bandwidth is not listed. Intel also supports ECC memory, which AMD does not. For PCIe, AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), giving Intel a generational advantage in storage and GPU connectivity. Both chips feature integrated graphics: AMD’s Radeon 760M versus Intel’s UHD Graphics 770, though no benchmark data is provided for either.

The market segments reflect their intended use. AMD’s chip is a mobile processor on Socket FP8, released in December 2023. Intel’s is a desktop part on Socket 1700, released in June 2024. Neither has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is off the table for both. The AMD part uses the Hawk Point codename, while Intel uses Raptor Lake-R, and both are actively in production.

The Verdict

The benchmark data supports a clear split based on workload priority. Choose the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS if you value single-thread performance, encryption throughput, and energy efficiency. Its 35.9% lead in PassMark single-thread and 15.8% edge in encryption are compelling for interactive and security-focused use cases. The 28 W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops, and its 9 benchmark wins show broad everyday competence. It is also the better choice for random string sorting (20% lead) and extended instructions (10.5% lead), indicating strength in niche but real-world tasks.

Choose the Intel Core i7-14701TE if your workloads are multi-core heavy and you have the power budget. Its 32.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the single most important metric for rendering, video encoding, and compilation. The 51% advantage in prime number finding and 47.8% physics lead further cement its position for scientific and simulation work. The 33 MB L3 cache and 8-core configuration provide headroom that AMD cannot match, even with its efficiency advantage. For desktop users with access to 45 W of power and a need for maximum threaded performance, Intel is the data-backed winner.

Neither chip dominates outright. Both sit at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, and their average scores differ by only 0.4%. The AMD chip wins more tests, but the Intel chip wins the tests that typically matter most for productivity. If you cannot decide based on benchmarks alone, consider the platform: AMD Socket FP8 is mobile-only, while Intel Socket 1700 is desktop-only. The data suggests these are not direct competitors in the same machine, but rather two different answers to the same question of balanced performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 3,584 in PassMark single-thread, which is 35.9% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701TE’s 2,637. In Cinebench R15 single-core, AMD leads 268 to 242, a 10.7% advantage.

Q: How do the two compare in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins Cinebench R23 multi-core with 17,035 points versus AMD’s 11,486, a 32.6% lead. The Intel chip also wins Cinebench R23 single-core 2,405 to 1,711, a 28.9% margin.

Q: Which chip has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel also has a larger shared L3 cache at 33 MB versus AMD’s 16 MB.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45 W. This makes AMD more suitable for mobile devices, while Intel targets desktop systems.

Q: Which processor wins the most benchmark tests?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS wins 9 of the 15 head-to-head tests, including data compression, encryption, integer math, and single-thread tests. The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins 6, but with larger margins in multi-core and floating-point workloads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS does not. Intel also supports both DDR4 and DDR5, whereas AMD supports only DDR5.