AMD Ryzen 5 8600G vs Intel Core i7-1360P Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1360P and AMD Ryzen 5 8600G occupy different corners of the processor market, yet their benchmark results place them in a surprisingly close overall performance tier. The Intel part is a 12-core mobile processor built for thin-and-light laptops, while the AMD chip is a 6-core desktop APU aimed at compact systems. Despite the Core i7’s higher core count and thread count, the benchmark data shows the Ryzen 5 8600G winning all 17 head-to-head comparisons, often by significant margins. The data reveals a clear performance hierarchy, but the context of each processor’s intended platform is essential for interpretation.

Where Each One Wins

Looking strictly at the head-to-head results, the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G wins every single benchmark category. There is no benchmark where the Intel Core i7-1360P takes the lead. However, the magnitude of the wins varies substantially, which points to different strengths. The Ryzen 5 8600G’s largest advantages come in heavily multithreaded and extension-heavy workloads. For instance, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 21503 against Intel’s 11266.5, a 47.6% delta. Similarly, in PassMark extended instructions, the Ryzen 5 8600G posts 22610 versus 11581, a 48.8% gap. These results indicate that the AMD processor is the clear choice for content creation, rendering, and any task that scales with many threads or leverages modern instruction sets.

The Intel Core i7-1360P’s best showing is in floating-point math, where it trails by only 4% (45997 vs 47919). That narrow margin suggests that in certain scientific or mathematical workloads, the two processors are nearly equivalent. The Intel chip also stays relatively close in integer math, with an 11.8% deficit (67963 vs 77042). For single-threaded tasks, the Ryzen 5 8600G is still ahead, but the gap is smaller at 10.8% in PassMark single-thread (3461 vs 3878). This means that for everyday responsiveness, web browsing, and lighter productivity apps, the Intel processor is competitive, even if it is not the top performer.

The use-case split is therefore stark: the Ryzen 5 8600G is the dominant choice for demanding workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Intel Core i7-1360P is more suited for power-constrained environments where its 28 W TDP and 12-core configuration provide a balance of performance and efficiency, particularly in mobile form factors where the AMD part’s 65 W TDP would be impractical.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The Intel Core i7-1360P uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-P variant, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It features a hybrid design with 12 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is based on Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. This process advantage is significant; the 4 nm node allows AMD to pack 25,000 million transistors into a 178 mm² die, though the Intel part’s transistor count and die size are not listed in the data.

The core configurations differ substantially. Intel’s 12-core part offers 16 threads, while AMD’s 6-core part offers 12 threads. Despite having fewer physical cores, the Ryzen 5 8600G achieves higher performance, indicating that Zen 4’s per-core execution is far more efficient than Raptor Lake’s. The base clocks tell a similar story: Intel’s base clock is 2.20 GHz, while AMD’s is 4.30 GHz. Both processors boost to 5.00 GHz, but the AMD part starts from a much higher baseline.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD offers 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has more total cache, yet it still loses in performance, underscoring that architectural efficiency matters more than raw cache capacity. Memory support is another divergence: Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. The AMD part also has a listed memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, a figure not provided for Intel. Both use dual-channel memory buses and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ as well. Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while AMD uses Radeon 760M. The data does not provide graphics benchmarks, so a direct comparison is not possible, but the AMD part’s desktop-class positioning suggests different design priorities. The Intel processor targets mobile with a 28 W TDP, while the AMD desktop part has a 65 W TDP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victory for the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 21503 against Intel’s 11266.5. That is a 47.6% advantage, meaning the AMD chip completes the render nearly twice as fast. This is the largest delta in the entire benchmark suite and highlights the Zen 4 architecture’s multithreaded prowess. The Cinebench R20 multi-core test shows a similar pattern: AMD scores 9031 versus Intel’s 6530, a 27.7% gap. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD’s lead narrows to 14.3% (2167 vs 1858), suggesting that the gap grows as the workload becomes more sustained and complex.

Single-core performance is also dominated by AMD, but the margins are smaller. In Cinebench R23 single-core, AMD scores 3035 versus Intel’s 1829, a 39.7% delta. This is a substantial lead, but it is less than the multi-core gap. Cinebench R20 single-core shows AMD ahead by 27.7% (1274 vs 921), and Cinebench R15 single-core shows a 15.4% lead for AMD (305 vs 258). These results indicate that even in lightly threaded tasks, the Ryzen 5 8600G’s higher base clock and newer architecture provide a clear advantage.

PassMark results reinforce the pattern. In data compression, AMD scores 293306 versus Intel’s 203746, a 30.5% lead. In data encryption, AMD is ahead by 27.5% (17181 vs 12463). The extended instructions test shows AMD’s largest PassMark win at 48.8% (22610 vs 11581), indicating that Zen 4’s AVX-512 or similar extensions are far more effective. Integer math shows AMD ahead by 11.8% (77042 vs 67963), while floating-point math is the closest contest at 4% (47919 vs 45997). The multithreaded PassMark score shows AMD at 25294 versus Intel’s 18632, a 26.3% lead. Physics tests show a smaller 11.7% gap (1450 vs 1280), and random string sorting shows AMD ahead by 35.8% (35067 vs 22522). Finally, single-thread PassMark confirms AMD’s lead at 10.8% (3878 vs 3461).

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is significantly faster. It wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 47.6% (21503 vs 11266.5) and PassMark multithread by 26.3% (25294 vs 18632).

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-1360P competitive in single-threaded tasks?

A: It is competitive but not faster. The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G leads in both Cinebench R23 single-core (3035 vs 1829, a 39.7% gap) and PassMark single-thread (3878 vs 3461, a 10.8% gap).

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-1360P has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the closest benchmark result between the two?

A: The closest result is in PassMark floating-point math, where the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G leads by only 4% (47919 vs 45997).

Q: Do both processors support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, both support DDR5. However, the Intel Core i7-1360P also supports DDR4, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G supports only DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has a base clock of 4.30 GHz, compared to the Intel Core i7-1360P’s base clock of 2.20 GHz. Both have a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Specification Differences

The most obvious difference is in core count: the Intel Core i7-1360P has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The base clocks differ dramatically, with Intel at 2.20 GHz and AMD at 4.30 GHz, though both have a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The TDP is another major split: Intel is rated at 28 W, while AMD is rated at 65 W. The sockets are incompatible, with Intel using BGA 1744 and AMD using Socket AM5.

The manufacturing process differs, with Intel on 10 nm and AMD on 4 nm. AMD’s process node is fabricated by TSMC, while Intel uses its own foundry. The cache configurations are different: Intel has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of L3 shared; AMD has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 shared. Memory support is narrower on AMD, which supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while Intel does not provide this figure. The integrated graphics are also different: Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 EU, while AMD uses Radeon 760M. Finally, the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core i7-1360P does not.