AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE vs Intel Xeon 6337P Comparison

The benchmark data presents a clear contrast between the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE and the Intel Xeon 6337P. Both processors feature 6 cores and 12 threads, but the recorded performance metrics show distinct strengths in different workloads, with the Intel Xeon 6337P claiming a majority of the test victories.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Xeon 6337P dominates the Cinebench suite with a consistent performance margin. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Xeon scores 1893 against the Ryzen's 1808, a 4.5% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows the same pattern: 267 versus 255, also a 4.5% lead for Intel. This consistency carries through Cinebench R20 and R23. In R20 multicore, the Xeon records 7888 compared to 7534, and in R23 multicore it reaches 18783 versus 17940. Every Cinebench test, whether single-core or multi-core, shows the Xeon ahead by exactly 4.5%.

The Passmark suite reveals a more nuanced picture. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE wins four of the eleven Passmark tests. Its largest victory comes in extended instructions, where it scores 17962 against Intel's 15366, a 16.9% advantage. The Ryzen also leads in data encryption, scoring 14197 versus 12604, a 12.6% margin, and in random string sorting, where it posts 29501 against 26135, a 12.9% lead. In data compression, the AMD part scores 246397 compared to the Xeon's 237373, a 3.8% edge.

The Intel Xeon 6337P counters with decisive wins elsewhere. The largest delta appears in Passmark physics, where the Xeon scores 1729 against 1150, a 33.5% advantage. Find prime numbers also favors Intel heavily, with 108 versus 79, a 26.9% gap. Floating point math shows the Xeon at 53150 versus 39065, a 26.5% lead, and integer math comes in at 72301 against 62666, a 13.3% margin. The Passmark multithread test goes to the Xeon at 22098 versus 21135, a 4.4% edge, and single-thread performance favors Intel at 4104 versus 3914, a 4.6% difference.

Overall, the Intel Xeon 6337P wins 13 of the 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks. The average benchmark score for the Xeon sits at 28333, compared to 27712 for the Ryzen, a modest overall advantage. The percentile rankings are close as well, with the Xeon at the 80th percentile of all CPUs and the Ryzen at the 79th.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix2 codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Xeon 6337P employs Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The AMD chip contains 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, while the Intel die measures 163 mm² with no transistor count recorded.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The Ryzen 5 8500GE provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Xeon 6337P offers larger cache tiers: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. These differences align with the Intel part's higher base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz, compared to the Ryzen's 3.40 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost.

Platform support also diverges. The AMD processor uses Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory exclusively, with a measured memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel Xeon runs on Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though its memory bandwidth figure is not recorded. Both support ECC memory. The Ryzen offers PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the Xeon brings PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The AMD part includes integrated Radeon 740M graphics; the Intel Xeon has no integrated graphics. The Ryzen has an unlocked multiplier, while the Xeon is locked. The Ryzen targets the mobile market segment, whereas the Xeon is positioned for server and workstation use.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon 6337P boosts to 5.30 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE reaches 5.00 GHz.

Q: How much larger is the Intel processor's L3 cache?

A: The Xeon 6337P has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Ryzen 5 8500GE has 16 MB, a difference of 2 MB.

Q: Which processor performs better in encryption workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE wins the Passmark data encryption test with a score of 14197, compared to 12604 for the Intel Xeon 6337P, a 12.6% advantage.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE and the Intel Xeon 6337P list ECC memory support as enabled.

Q: What is the release date of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE was released on April 15, 2024. The Intel Xeon 6337P followed on February 23, 2025.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Xeon 6337P has a TDP of 80 watts.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in almost every major specification category. The Xeon 6337P has higher clocks, at 3.50 GHz base and 5.30 GHz boost, against the Ryzen's 3.40 GHz and 5.00 GHz. Power draw favors AMD, with the Ryzen rated at 35 watts TDP versus 80 watts for the Xeon. The sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket AM5 for the Ryzen, Intel Socket 1700 for the Xeon.

Architecture and manufacturing differ completely. The Ryzen uses Zen 4 on a 4 nm TSMC process with 20,900 million transistors and a 137 mm² die. The Xeon uses Raptor Lake on a 10 nm Intel process with a 163 mm² die and no transistor count recorded. Cache configurations are larger on the Intel part at every level: 80 KB versus 64 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB versus 1 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB versus 16 MB L3 total.

Memory support diverges, with the Ryzen limited to DDR5 and the Xeon supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. The Ryzen records 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, while the Xeon has no bandwidth figure listed. PCIe capabilities favor Intel with Gen 5 and 16 lanes, against Gen 4 and 14 lanes for AMD. The Ryzen integrates Radeon 740M graphics, while the Xeon has none. The Ryzen has an unlocked multiplier; the Xeon does not. The Ryzen targets mobile, and the Xeon targets server and workstation. The Xeon carries a launch MSRP of $375. Production status for both is listed as active.

The Verdict

The recorded data points toward the Intel Xeon 6337P as the stronger overall performer. It wins the majority of benchmarks, including every Cinebench test and the Passmark multithread and single-thread metrics. Its average benchmark score of 28333 exceeds the Ryzen's 27712, and it holds a higher percentile ranking at 80 versus 79. For workloads that rely on physics simulation, prime number finding, floating point math, or integer math, the Xeon's advantages range from 13.3% to 33.5%, making it the clear choice.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is not without its own strengths. It wins in data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting, with its best margins coming in encryption and string sorting. The Ryzen also offers a dramatically lower TDP of 35 watts against 80 watts, integrated graphics where the Xeon has none, and a smaller die size. For scenarios where power efficiency is paramount, or where workloads emphasize encryption and instruction handling, the Ryzen presents a compelling alternative despite lower raw throughput in most tests.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon 6337P takes the lead in compute-heavy and physics-oriented tasks. Its 33.5% margin in Passmark physics makes it the preferred option for simulation workloads. The 26.9% advantage in find prime numbers and the 26.5% lead in floating point math indicate strength in mathematical and scientific processing. Integer math, with a 13.3% edge, further supports the Xeon for general compute tasks. The 4.4% multithread and 4.6% single-thread wins make it the better all-around choice in Passmark's core metrics, and the consistent 4.5% Cinebench lead across all versions confirms a broad multi-core and single-core advantage.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE wins in specialized data handling tasks. Its 16.9% lead in extended instructions suggests efficient execution of advanced instruction sets. The 12.6% encryption advantage makes it suitable for security-related workloads. Random string sorting shows a 12.9% edge, pointing to strength in data organization tasks. Data compression, with a 3.8% win, rounds out a pattern of superiority in data-centric operations. The Ryzen also holds the efficiency crown with its 35 watt TDP, making it the better fit for thermally constrained or power-sensitive environments. Its integrated Radeon 740M graphics provide display output capability that the Xeon lacks entirely.