AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE vs Intel Core i7-13700H Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE
Core i7-13700H
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE vs Intel Core i7-13700H
The Intel Core i7-13700H and AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE present a fascinating contrast in mobile computing priorities. The data shows two processors with identical boost clocks of 5.00 GHz but radically different approaches to achieving performance, with the Intel part relying on a hybrid core layout and higher power envelope, while the AMD chip uses a more modern manufacturing process and fewer, faster cores. Benchmark results reveal a split personality: Intel dominates legacy multi-threaded workloads, while AMD claims victory in the newest Cinebench tests and single-thread PassMark scores.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core i7-13700H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE has 6 cores and 12 threads. This core count difference drives Intel's substantial lead in most multi-threaded benchmarks.
Q: How do their single-thread performances compare?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3914, which is 8.2% ahead of the Intel's 3594. However, in Cinebench R15 single-core, Intel wins by 5.5% (269 vs 255), while AMD takes Cinebench R23 single-core by a significant 26.7% margin (2532 vs 1856).
Q: Which CPU has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 27712, compared to Intel's 27355. Both processors sit at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, and AMD's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X with a deltaPct of 0.3%.
Q: What are the manufacturing process differences?
A: The Intel Core i7-13700H is built on Intel's 10 nm process, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE uses TSMC's 4 nm process. The AMD chip also has 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, while Intel's transistor count and die size are not listed in the data.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE supports ECC memory and has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s with DDR5 support. The Intel Core i7-13700H does not support ECC memory but supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with no memory bandwidth figure listed.
Q: How many benchmark wins does each processor claim?
A: The Intel Core i7-13700H wins 13 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE wins 4. Intel's wins are concentrated in older Cinebench versions and nearly all PassMark workloads.
Architecture Differences
The two processors could not be more different in their underlying designs. The Intel Core i7-13700H uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, featuring a hybrid configuration with 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE employs the Zen 4 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm node, packing 6 cores and 12 threads. This process advantage gives AMD a transistor count of 20,900 million on a 137 mm² die, whereas Intel's transistor count and die size remain undisclosed in the data.
Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD counters with 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel design clearly prioritizes larger caches to feed its higher core count. Memory support also differs: Intel accepts both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, while AMD exclusively supports DDR5 with a rated memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is available only on the AMD part.
PCIe connectivity shows another split. Intel offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while AMD relies on the Radeon 740M. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, a feature absent on the Intel part. Power envelopes differ notably, with the Intel rated at 45W TDP versus AMD's 35W TDP, which helps explain the thermal headroom Intel uses for its extra cores.
The Verdict
The data paints a clear picture for different use cases. The Intel Core i7-13700H is the choice for users who need raw multi-threaded throughput in legacy and intermediate workloads. It wins 13 of 17 benchmarks, with crushing margins in floating-point math (69.8%), integer math (48.1%), physics (50%), and data encryption (26.6%). This processor excels in applications that scale across its 14 cores and 20 threads, making it suitable for content creation, scientific computing, and heavy multitasking.
The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE presents a more compelling case for single-thread dominance and efficiency. Its 26.7% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 8.2% advantage in PassMark single-thread suggest superior per-core performance, likely benefiting from the 4 nm process and Zen 4 architecture. The AMD chip also wins the critical Cinebench R23 multi-core test by 13.7%, despite having fewer cores. This suggests newer, better-optimized workloads favor AMD's architecture. However, AMD's wins are fewer and more concentrated, making Intel the safer choice for broad compatibility across diverse software.
For mobile users prioritizing battery life and modern efficiency, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE's 35W TDP and advanced process node make it attractive. For users who value raw computational power in legacy multi-threaded applications and don't mind a higher power draw, the Intel Core i7-13700H is the data-backed winner. The AMD chip's unlocked multiplier also appeals to enthusiasts seeking tuning flexibility, though the Intel part offers a higher launch MSRP of $502, which is not directly comparable since AMD's launch MSRP is null.
Specification Differences
| Specification | Intel Core i7-13700H | AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 14 | 6 |
| Threads | 20 | 12 |
| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.00 GHz |
| TDP | 45 W | 35 W |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 83.2 GB/s |
| ECC Memory | No | Yes |
| PCIe | Gen 5, 8 Lanes | Gen 4, 14 Lanes |
| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Radeon 740M |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | AMD Socket AM5 |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2024-04-15 |
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Intel Core i7-13700H dominates the most decisive benchmark wins. In PassMark floating-point math, Intel scores 66322 against AMD's 39065, a 69.8% lead that represents the largest margin in the entire comparison. Integer math shows a 48.1% advantage (92811 vs 62666), and physics tests reveal a 50% gap (1725 vs 1150). Data compression and encryption also favor Intel significantly, with margins of 24.9% and 26.6% respectively. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows Intel winning 2496 to 1808, a 38.1% gap, while Cinebench R20 multi-core has Intel ahead by 22.5% (9231 vs 7534). Even in extended instructions, Intel edges out AMD by 1.9% (18303 vs 17962).
The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE claims its biggest victory in Cinebench R23 single-core, scoring 2532 against Intel's 1856, a 26.7% advantage. The Cinebench R23 multi-core test also goes to AMD, with 17940 versus 15474, a 13.7% lead. PassMark single-thread shows AMD winning 3914 to 3594, an 8.2% margin. Interestingly, AMD wins the newer Cinebench R23 versions while losing the older R15 and R20 iterations, suggesting the benchmark evolution favors AMD's architecture. Intel's Cinebench R20 single-core win of 22.6% (1303 vs 1063) contrasts sharply with AMD's R23 single-core dominance, highlighting the divergent performance across software generations.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i7-13700H is the clear winner in legacy multi-threaded applications. Its 14 cores and 20 threads power through Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core tests with leads of 38.1% and 22.5%, respectively. The PassMark suite shows Intel's strength across the board: data compression (24.9% lead), data encryption (26.6%), find prime numbers (30.4%), floating-point math (69.8%), integer math (48.1%), multithread (24.9%), physics (50%), and random string sorting (13.9%). This pattern indicates Intel's dominance in general-purpose computing, encryption workloads, and math-heavy simulations. The 5.5% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core also gives Intel an edge in some older single-threaded applications.
The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE wins in the most modern benchmarks and pure single-thread workloads. Its 26.7% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core is the largest single-thread margin in the comparison, suggesting Zen 4's efficiency shines in contemporary applications. The 13.7% win in Cinebench R23 multi-core is particularly notable given AMD's 6-core disadvantage, indicating that newer multi-threaded software scales better with AMD's architecture. The 8.2% PassMark single-thread win (3914 vs 3594) reinforces AMD's per-core superiority. These wins position the AMD chip as the choice for users running the latest software versions, single-threaded productivity tools, and workloads optimized for Zen 4. The 35W TDP also suggests AMD achieves these results with lower power consumption, a critical factor for mobile users.