AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE vs Intel Core i5-13490F Comparison

The Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE represent two distinct approaches to modern desktop computing, with the database recording 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons between them. The Intel part secures 15 wins, while the AMD part takes 2, reflecting a fundamental split in their design priorities. The Core i5-13490F is a high-core-count desktop processor built for maximum throughput, while the Ryzen 5 8500GE is a low-power, mobile-derived chip with integrated graphics, aimed at efficiency and compact systems. The following analysis breaks down where each processor wins, what their architectural differences mean, and which user should consider each part.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13490F dominates nearly every performance category in the head-to-head data. Its largest margin of victory comes in PassMark physics, where it scores 1915 against the Ryzen 5 8500GE’s 1150, a 66.5% advantage. This indicates a substantial lead in workloads that rely heavily on processor core count and raw execution resources. Similarly, in floating-point math, the Intel part scores 60273 versus 39065, a 54.3% lead, showing clear superiority in scientific and engineering calculations. The Intel chip also wins in data compression (328397 vs 246397, 33.3% ahead), integer math (83723 vs 62666, 33.6% ahead), and prime number finding (114 vs 79, 44.3% ahead). These are all multi-threaded tasks that scale with the Intel part’s higher core and thread count.

The Intel processor also wins all six Cinebench tests, both multi-core and single-core. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 22747 versus 17940 for the AMD, a 26.8% lead, while its single-core score of 3211 versus 2532 also shows a 26.8% advantage. This consistency across the Cinebench suite indicates that the Intel architecture delivers higher performance per clock in addition to having more cores. The only two wins for the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE come in PassMark single-thread tests, where it scores 3914 versus the Intel’s 3828, a 2.2% margin. This is a narrow victory, but it does indicate that the AMD part has a slight edge in lightly threaded, latency-sensitive workloads where its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz can be leveraged.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different platforms. The Intel Core i5-13490F uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, manufactured by Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and has no integrated graphics. The TDP is 65 watts, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE uses Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename, built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its cache is smaller: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports only DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, and includes integrated Radeon 740M graphics. It also supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not. The TDP is only 35 watts, and it uses the AMD Socket AM5. The AMD part has a smaller die at 137 mm² but packs 20,900 million transistors, compared to the Intel part which has no listed transistor count. The AMD chip is also multiplier unlocked, allowing overclocking, while the Intel chip is locked.

These differences explain the benchmark results. The Intel part’s higher core count (10 vs 6) and larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB) drive its multi-threaded wins. The AMD part’s higher boost clock (5.00 GHz vs 4.80 GHz) helps it win the PassMark single-thread test. The AMD part’s much lower TDP (35 vs 65 watts) and integrated graphics make it suitable for systems where power draw and space are critical, while the Intel part requires a discrete GPU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a clear pattern: the Intel Core i5-13490F wins almost everything, often by significant margins. The largest single win is in PassMark physics, with the Intel scoring 1915 against the AMD’s 1150, a 66.5% lead. This is followed by floating-point math, where the Intel scores 60273 versus 39065, a 54.3% advantage. In prime number finding, the Intel scores 114 versus 79, a 44.3% lead. Integer math shows a 33.6% lead (83723 vs 62666), and data compression shows a 33.3% lead (328397 vs 246397). Data encryption is also a clear win for Intel, with 17902 versus 14197, a 26.1% margin.

The Cinebench suite shows a uniform 26.8% lead for Intel across all tests, including R15, R20, and R23, in both multi-core and single-core variants. For example, Cinebench R23 multi-core shows 22747 versus 17940, and single-core shows 3211 versus 2532. This uniformity suggests that the Intel architecture has a consistent IPC advantage over the AMD part in these rendering workloads. The Intel part also wins PassMark extended instructions (20837 vs 17962, 16% ahead), multithread (26569 vs 21135, 25.7% ahead), and random string sorting (34042 vs 29501, 15.4% ahead).

The only AMD wins are in PassMark single-thread and singlethread, which are the same test recorded twice. The AMD scores 3914 versus the Intel’s 3828, a 2.2% margin. This is a modest but real victory, indicating that for purely single-threaded tasks, the AMD part’s higher boost clock provides a slight edge. However, this narrow win does little to offset the Intel part’s dominance across the rest of the benchmark suite.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F wins all multi-core tests in the database. It leads by 26.8% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (22747 vs 17940) and by 25.7% in PassMark multithread (26569 vs 21135).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3914 versus the Intel’s 3828, a 2.2% margin. This appears twice in the database as both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark physics, where the Intel part scores 1915 versus 1150 for the AMD, a 66.5% advantage. The second largest is in floating-point math, with a 54.3% lead.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE includes Radeon 740M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-13490F has no integrated graphics, so it requires a discrete GPU.

Q: Are both processors overclockable?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. The Intel Core i5-13490F has a locked multiplier, so it cannot be overclocked.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i5-13490F for any workload that benefits from multi-threading. It wins 15 of 17 head-to-head comparisons, often by substantial margins. Its 26.8% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 33.6% lead in integer math make it the stronger choice for content creation, rendering, and compilation tasks. The 66.5% lead in PassMark physics and 54.3% lead in floating-point math further cement its position for simulation and scientific workloads. Users who need maximum throughput and already have a discrete GPU should choose the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is the better pick for different reasons. Its 2.2% lead in PassMark single-thread performance shows it can handle lightly threaded tasks slightly better. More importantly, its 35-watt TDP, compared to the Intel’s 65 watts, makes it suitable for low-power or compact systems. The integrated Radeon 740M graphics eliminate the need for a separate GPU, which is critical for space-constrained builds. ECC memory support also makes it viable for certain workstation or server applications where data integrity is paramount. Users prioritizing efficiency, small form factor, or integrated graphics should choose the AMD part, accepting the significant multi-core performance trade-off.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-13490F | AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.50 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM5 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 4 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-S | Phoenix2 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 137 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 20,900 million |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 83.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon 740M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2023-02-09 | 2024-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | $235 | Not listed |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |