AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE vs Intel Core i5-12600KF Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE

CORE STATE Phoenix2
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-12600KF

CORE STATE Alder Lake-S
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.7 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Alder Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,808
2,357
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
255
332
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,534
9,824
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,063
1,386
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,940
23,391
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,532
3,302
passmark_data_compression
246,397
343,231
passmark_data_encryption
14,197
18,445
passmark_extended_instructions
17,962
22,003
passmark_find_prime_numbers
79
91
passmark_floating_point_math
39,065
67,074
passmark_integer_math
62,666
87,830
passmark_multithread
21,135
27,575
passmark_physics
1,150
1,539
passmark_random_string_sorting
29,501
35,602
passmark_single_thread
3,914
3,925
passmark_singlethread
3,914
3,925
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
7,956
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
1,995
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
3,806
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
6,128
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
7,952
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
1,016
geekbench_multicore
N/A
12,137
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,157

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE vs Intel Core i5-12600KF

Intel Core i5-12600KF vs AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE — benchmark results show a decisive sweep: the Intel part wins all 17 head-to-head tests, with the widest margins in floating-point math and the narrowest in single-thread performance. Despite the AMD chip’s higher boost clock and smaller process node, the Intel i5-12600KF holds a commanding lead in nearly every workload category, though the Ryzen 5 8500GE counters with drastically lower power draw and integrated graphics.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-12600KF dominates the Cinebench suite with a consistent 30.4% advantage across every version. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 23,391 against AMD’s 17,940; single-core shows 3,302 versus 2,532 — identical 30.4% deltas. This uniformity suggests the gap is structural, not workload-specific.

PassMark results amplify the leadership further. Floating-point math is the biggest blowout: Intel scores 67,074 versus 39,065, a 71.7% lead. Integer math follows at 40.2% (87,830 vs 62,666). Data compression shows a 39.3% delta (343,231 vs 246,397), and encryption trails at 29.9% (18,445 vs 14,197). The pattern is clear: the i5-12600KF’s extra cores and threads translate into large gains on parallel math and data-heavy tasks.

Single-thread performance is the only close contest. PassMark single-thread scores 3,925 versus 3,914 — a 0.3% delta that is almost negligible. This aligns with the boost clocks: AMD’s 5.00 GHz tops Intel’s 4.90 GHz, yet the Intel architecture still edges ahead. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the margin is larger at 30.2% (332 vs 255), but the PassMark result shows the Ryzen 5 8500GE can nearly match Intel when the workload is light on cores.

Other PassMark subtests reinforce the overall verdict. Multi-thread scores 27,575 vs 21,135 (30.5% delta); physics shows 1,539 vs 1,150 (33.8%); extended instructions 22,003 vs 17,962 (22.5%); prime numbers 91 vs 79 (15.2%); random string sorting 35,602 vs 29,501 (20.7%). The smallest margin outside single-thread is prime numbers at 15.2%, still a solid win for Intel. Across all 17 head-to-head tests, Intel wins every one; AMD records zero wins.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. Intel’s Core i5-12600KF uses Alder Lake-S architecture on a 10 nm process fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². AMD’s Ryzen 5 8500GE leverages Zen 4 (Phoenix2) on a 4 nm process from TSMC, packing 20,900 million transistors into a 137 mm² die. The process node advantage is clear — AMD uses a smaller, denser manufacturing technology.

Core counts differ sharply. The Intel chip offers 10 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD part provides 6 cores and 12 threads. This explains the multi-core benchmark gaps. Cache configurations also diverge: Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3; AMD counters with 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Intel’s larger caches at every level contribute to its data-heavy workload wins.

Memory support reveals a generational split. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. Both run dual-channel memory, but AMD specifies 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Intel chip lacks integrated graphics, whereas the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE includes Radeon 740M iGPU — a critical difference for systems without a discrete GPU.

Power and platform targets diverge significantly. Intel’s TDP is 125 W on Intel Socket 1700, aimed at desktop; AMD’s TDP is 35 W on AMD Socket AM5, classified as mobile. Intel has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only), while AMD has 14. AMD supports ECC memory; Intel does not. Both have unlocked multipliers, but the release dates differ: Intel launched on 2021-11-03, AMD on 2024-04-15.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF wins all Cinebench multi-core tests by exactly 30.4%. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 23,391 versus AMD’s 17,940.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE competitive in single-thread tasks?

A: Nearly, but not quite. PassMark single-thread shows Intel at 3,925 and AMD at 3,914 — a 0.3% gap. The AMD chip’s 5.00 GHz boost clock nearly offsets Intel’s 4.90 GHz, but Intel still takes the win.

Q: What is the biggest performance difference between them?

A: Floating-point math shows the largest delta at 71.7% (67,074 vs 39,065). Integer math follows at 40.2% (87,830 vs 62,666).

Q: Does the AMD chip have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 8500GE includes Radeon 740M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-12600KF has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE has a TDP of 35 W, while the Intel Core i5-12600KF has a TDP of 125 W. AMD’s part is far more power-efficient.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-12600KF does not.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core i5-12600KF | AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE |

|-------|------------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.70 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 125 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM5 |

| Architecture | Alder Lake | Zen 4 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 137 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 83.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe Lanes | 20 (Gen 4) | 14 (Gen 4) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon 740M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2021-11-03 | 2024-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | $264 | Not specified |

The Verdict

Benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-12600KF wins every single head-to-head test, making it the faster processor in absolute performance terms. The average benchmark score confirms this — Intel at 27,799 versus AMD at 27,712, a 0.3% gap that favors Intel. Both CPUs sit at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, indicating similar overall standing, but the Intel part achieves that standing with consistently higher workload scores.

The Intel chip’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide a structural advantage over AMD’s 6 cores and 12 threads. This shows up everywhere: Cinebench multi-core, PassMark multi-thread, integer math, and data compression all favor Intel by 30% or more. For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, the i5-12600KF is the clear choice.

However, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is not without merit. Its 35 W TDP versus Intel’s 125 W means dramatically lower power consumption. It includes Radeon 740M integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a separate GPU in basic systems. It supports ECC memory, which Intel does not. And its 5.00 GHz boost clock nearly matches Intel’s single-thread performance, with only a 0.3% gap in PassMark.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Core i5-12600KF wins in every benchmark category tested. The largest advantages come in floating-point math (71.7% lead) and integer math (40.2% lead). It is better for multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and data processing where the 30.4% Cinebench multi-core advantage matters. Its 20 MB L3 cache and larger per-core L1/L2 caches support data-heavy applications. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering platform flexibility. The 125 W TDP indicates a desktop-oriented design that assumes a discrete GPU, making it suitable for high-performance gaming or workstation builds.

AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE wins on efficiency and platform features, not benchmark scores. Its 35 W TDP is ideal for compact or power-sensitive systems. The integrated Radeon 740M means it can run without a dedicated graphics card, suiting office desktops or media centers. ECC memory support targets reliability-focused workloads. Its 4 nm process and 137 mm² die size demonstrate modern manufacturing efficiency. The 5.00 GHz boost clock allows it to nearly match Intel in single-threaded tasks, with only a 0.3% PassMark gap. For users who prioritize low power draw, integrated graphics, or ECC support over raw multi-core performance, the Ryzen 5 8500GE is the logical pick.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 8500GE
i5-12600KF
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.4
3.7 +8.8%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
4.9 -2.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.4
3.7 +8.8%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
4.9 -2.0%
Multiplier
34
37 +8.8%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
125 +257.1%
PL1
—
150W
PL2
—
150W
PPT
47 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Alder Lake
Codename
Phoenix2
Alder Lake-S
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))
Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
—
Die Size
137 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
Z690. H670, B660, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
3.1 GHz up to 3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz up to 3.6 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 740M
—
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$264
Part Number
100-000001495
SRL4U
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Stealth
—
View Ryzen 5 8500GE Details View Core i5-12600KF Details