AMD Ryzen 5 8400F vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and the Intel Core i5-14501TE. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark entries, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. This means a direct numeric comparison of the two processors is not possible from the recorded data.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, however, has a substantial set of benchmark scores. Its 3DMark results include 6091 in the 16-thread test, 1874 in the 2-thread test, 3563 in the 4-thread test, 5275 in the 8-thread test, 6165 in the max-thread test, and 951 in the single-thread test. In Cinebench, it scores 2101 in R15 multi-core, 296 in R15 single-core, 8757 in R20 multi-core, 1236 in R20 single-core, 20851 in R23 multi-core, and 2943 in R23 single-core.

PassMark results for the AMD part show 288158 in data compression, 16646 in data encryption, 22175 in extended instructions, 89 in find prime numbers, 46217 in floating point math, 74021 in integer math, 24389 in multithread, 1332 in physics, 34604 in random string sorting, and 3685 in single-thread tests. The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is 25005, placing it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs.

Since the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark scores in the database, the head-to-head comparison must rely on the nearest rival data for the AMD part. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F sits 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H in average benchmark score. It trails the AMD EPYC 9474F by 0.4%. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the 8400F performs within a narrow band of these competitors.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a percentile rank of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the absence of recorded scores rather than actual performance. The database does not provide enough data to state which processor wins any specific test.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head benchmark scores, the win distribution cannot be determined from direct measurements. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F shows strong multi-threaded performance in its recorded scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 6165 indicate solid parallel processing capability. Single-thread performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 951.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE cannot be assigned wins because it lacks benchmark data. Its specifications, however, suggest areas where it might differ. It has a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz compared to the AMD's 4.70 GHz, which could favor single-threaded workloads, but this is not confirmed by any recorded score. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, which is absent on the AMD processor, potentially making it suitable for error-sensitive tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a base clock of 4.20 GHz, significantly higher than the Intel's 2.20 GHz. This could translate to better sustained performance in lightly threaded tasks, but again, no direct benchmark data confirms this. The database records indicate the AMD part is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted, which is not the case for the Intel processor.

For use-case splits, the data shows the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F delivers consistent multi-threaded scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests. The Intel Core i5-14501TE, with its lower TDP of 45 watts compared to 65 watts for the AMD part, may be designed for power-sensitive environments, but the database offers no performance figures to validate this.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename, built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. It contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel. Its die size is 215 mm², and the transistor count is not recorded in the database.

Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads, but their cache hierarchies differ. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor therefore holds larger caches at every level.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also with a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. ECC memory is supported on the Intel part but not on the AMD part.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770, while the AMD part has no integrated graphics.

The process node difference is notable: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. This typically indicates denser transistors and potentially better power efficiency for the AMD part, though the database does not provide efficiency measurements. The AMD part has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 45 watts.

The sockets differ entirely. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700. This means they are not interchangeable in any motherboard.

The release dates also differ. The AMD processor was released on 2024-03-31, while the Intel processor was released on 2024-06-30. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of $170, while the Intel part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The recorded data does not permit a direct verdict on which processor outperforms the other in benchmark tests. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has extensive benchmark scores, with an average score of 25005 and a 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking, which reflects missing data rather than performance.

For users selecting between these two processors, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F offers measurable performance in multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads based on the database. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 and single-core score of 2943 are recorded and can be compared to other CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14501TE offers features the AMD part lacks, such as ECC memory support, integrated graphics, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity.

The Intel part also has a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz compared to 4.70 GHz for the AMD part, and a lower TDP of 45 watts versus 65 watts. These specification differences could matter in specific scenarios, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm performance advantages.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is the only one of the two with recorded performance metrics, so it is the only one that can be evaluated numerically. The Intel Core i5-14501TE remains unmeasured in the database, and any performance claims about it would lack support.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: Yes, it has scores across 3DMark, Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, and multiple PassMark tests. Its average benchmark score is 25005.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the recorded data shows no benchmark entries for this processor. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the cache sizes for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has no integrated graphics.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and the Intel Core i5-14501TE:

• Series: 8000 series versus Core 14th Gen
• Base Clock: 4.20 GHz versus 2.20 GHz
• Boost Clock: 4.70 GHz versus 5.10 GHz
• TDP: 65 watts versus 45 watts
• Socket: AMD Socket AM5 versus Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture: Zen 4 versus Raptor Lake
• Codename: Phoenix versus Raptor Lake-R
• Generation: Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Phoenix)) versus Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
• Process Node: 4 nm versus 10 nm
• Foundry: TSMC versus Intel
• Transistors: 25,000 million versus not recorded
• Die Size: 178 mm² versus 215 mm²
• L1 Cache: 64 KB per core versus 80 KB per core
• L2 Cache: 1 MB per core versus 1.25 MB per core
• L3 Cache: 16 MB shared versus 24 MB shared
• Memory Support: DDR5 versus DDR4, DDR5
• Memory Bandwidth: 83.2 GB/s versus not recorded
• ECC Memory: not supported versus supported
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) versus Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only)
• Integrated Graphics: N/A versus UHD Graphics 770
• Release Date: 2024-03-31 versus 2024-06-30
• Launch MSRP: $170 versus not recorded
• Multiplier Unlocked: true versus false
• Part Number: 100-000001591 versus Q49KSRNJN