AMD Ryzen 5 7640U vs Intel Xeon D-2752TER Comparison

The Intel Xeon D-2752TER and AMD Ryzen 5 7640U occupy opposite ends of the computing spectrum, yet their average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The Xeon D-2752TER averages 25,530 points, while the Ryzen 5 7640U averages 25,485 points, a difference of just 0.2%. Both sit at the 78th percentile of all CPUs. However, these aggregate scores mask fundamentally different performance profiles. The Ryzen 5 7640U wins 14 of 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, including every Cinebench test, while the Xeon D-2752TER wins only 3. The data paints a clear picture: the mobile Ryzen is the faster processor in most workloads, but the Xeon holds specific strengths in physics simulation and prime number calculations. The Ryzen 5 7640U also does this while consuming 15W TDP compared to the Xeon's 77W TDP.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous regarding general performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms the Intel Xeon D-2752TER in 14 of 17 head-to-head tests, with margins ranging from 5.1% in data compression to a massive 43.5% in single-threaded PassMark tests. The Ryzen wins every single Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 test, both single-core and multi-core, by approximately 9.6% to 9.8%. This is a decisive victory for the mobile AMD chip across rendering, encryption, floating-point math, and integer math workloads.

The Intel Xeon D-2752TER is not without its advantages. It wins the PassMark find prime numbers test by 29.7% (96 vs 74), the physics test by 52% (1,777 vs 1,169), and random string sorting by 8.2% (31,802 vs 29,382). These are specialized workloads where the Xeon's 12 cores and 24 threads provide a distinct edge over the Ryzen's 6 cores and 12 threads. For server workloads involving prime number generation or physics simulations, the Xeon is the better choice.

For buyers, the decision hinges on workload. The Ryzen 5 7640U is the superior processor for general computing, content creation, and most server tasks. Its 3.50 GHz base clock and 4.90 GHz boost clock, combined with the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process, deliver higher performance across the board. The Xeon D-2752TER, with its 1.80 GHz base and 2.80 GHz boost on a 10 nm Ice Lake-D architecture, is slower in most tasks but excels in specific multi-threaded workloads that leverage its higher core count. The Xeon is a server/workstation part with a launch MSRP of $1061, while the Ryzen targets mobile platforms.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER uses the Ice Lake architecture, specifically Ice Lake-D, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. It features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 2.80 GHz. The TDP is 77W, reflecting its server/workstation positioning. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 with a quad-channel bus, providing 85.3 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. The Xeon has PCIe Gen 4 with 32 lanes (CPU only) and no integrated graphics.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The TDP is dramatically lower at 15W, highlighting its mobile focus. The cache is 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported. The Ryzen has PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated Radeon 760M graphics. The Ryzen uses 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm. This explains why the Ryzen achieves higher clock speeds (4.90 GHz boost vs 2.80 GHz) while consuming far less power (15W vs 77W). The Ryzen's higher base clock of 3.50 GHz is nearly double the Xeon's 1.80 GHz. The Xeon compensates with more cores and threads, but the Ryzen's architectural efficiency and clock advantage prove decisive in most benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Xeon D-2752TER has 12 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Xeon has double the core and thread count.

Q: How do the single-threaded performances compare?

A: The Ryzen 5 7640U is significantly faster in single-threaded workloads. In PassMark single-thread tests, the Ryzen scores 3,524 versus the Xeon's 1,990, a 43.5% advantage. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen scores 2,532 versus 2,288, a 9.6% advantage.

Q: Is there a workload where the Xeon D-2752TER wins?

A: Yes. The Xeon wins the PassMark find prime numbers test by 29.7% (96 vs 74) and the PassMark physics test by 52% (1,777 vs 1,169). It also wins random string sorting by 8.2% (31,802 vs 29,382).

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon D-2752TER has a TDP of 77W. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U has a TDP of 15W. The Ryzen consumes dramatically less power.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon D-2752TER and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U support ECC memory. The Xeon uses DDR4 with a quad-channel bus, while the Ryzen uses DDR5 with a dual-channel bus.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U has integrated graphics, featuring the Radeon 760M. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER has no integrated graphics.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon D-2752TER | AMD Ryzen 5 7640U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 6 |

| Threads | 24 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 1.80 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 2.80 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 77W | 15W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 2579 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Ice Lake | Zen 4 |

| Codename | Ice Lake-D | Phoenix |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not specified | 25,000 million |

| Die Size | Not specified | 178 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 32 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon 760M |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2022-02-23 | 2023-05-02 |

| Launch MSRP | $1061 | Not specified |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Ryzen 5 7640U dominates the Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen scores 17,936 versus the Xeon's 16,212, a 9.6% advantage. The pattern repeats in R20 multi-core (7,533 vs 6,809, -9.6%) and R15 multi-core (1,807 vs 1,634, -9.6%). Single-core results are similar: R23 shows 2,532 vs 2,288 (-9.6%), R20 shows 1,063 vs 960 (-9.7%), and R15 shows 255 vs 230 (-9.8%). The Ryzen's higher clock speeds and Zen 4 efficiency deliver consistent wins.

In PassMark tests, the Ryzen wins most categories. Data compression goes to the Ryzen at 240,032 versus 227,763, a 5.1% margin. Data encryption favors the Ryzen at 14,954 versus 13,097, a 12.4% edge. Extended instructions show a larger gap: 17,019 vs 13,846, a 18.6% advantage for the Ryzen. Floating-point math favors the Ryzen at 41,093 vs 33,533, a 18.4% difference. Integer math goes to the Ryzen at 70,483 vs 60,881, a 13.6% margin. The PassMark multithread test shows the Ryzen winning 21,115 vs 19,102, a 9.5% advantage. The single-thread test is the most lopsided, with the Ryzen scoring 3,524 versus the Xeon's 1,990, a 43.5% blowout.

The Xeon D-2752TER wins three specialized tests. The find prime numbers test shows the Xeon at 96 versus 74 for the Ryzen, a 29.7% advantage. The physics test is the Xeon's best result: 1,777 versus 1,169, a 52% margin. Random string sorting also goes to the Xeon at 31,802 versus 29,382, an 8.2% edge. These wins highlight the Xeon's strength in workloads that benefit from its 12 cores and 24 threads. The physics test, in particular, shows a massive 52% advantage that suggests the Xeon's core count is a decisive factor in certain simulation workloads. Overall, the Ryzen wins 14 benchmarks to the Xeon's 3, but the Xeon's wins are substantial in their specific domains.