AMD Ryzen 5 7600 vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

CORE STATE Raphael
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 32 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen 9 6900HX

CORE STATE Rembrandt
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3+
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE —

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
6,499
6,745
3dmark_2_threads
1,938
1,767
3dmark_4_threads
3,686
3,353
3dmark_8_threads
5,508
5,607
3dmark_max_threads
6,503
6,717
3dmark_single_thread
999
912
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,339
2,231
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
298
249
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
12,735
13,497
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,852
1,558
geekbench_multicore
13,413
9,850
geekbench_singlecore
2,521
1,881
passmark_data_compression
304,942
306,184
passmark_data_encryption
17,704
19,118
passmark_extended_instructions
23,071
20,849
passmark_find_prime_numbers
200
63
passmark_floating_point_math
48,107
49,981
passmark_integer_math
80,581
89,388
passmark_multithread
27,058
24,346
passmark_physics
1,776
1,153
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,904
32,037
passmark_single_thread
3,910
3,409
passmark_singlethread
3,910
3,409

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX are separated by a mere 0.2% in average benchmark score, with the desktop chip scoring 26,324 against the mobile chip’s 26,274. Both sit at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, making them statistical equals in overall performance. The data shows the Ryzen 5 7600 wins 15 of 23 head-to-head tests, while the Ryzen 9 6900HX takes 8, but the nature of those wins reveals a clear split: the desktop part dominates single-threaded and latency-sensitive workloads, while the mobile part leverages its extra cores for sustained multi-threaded throughput. This is not a case of one chip being simply faster; it is a case of two architectures optimized for different environments delivering near-identical aggregate results.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear recommendation for most desktop builders: the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is the stronger choice for general-purpose and single-threaded work. It leads by 34% in Geekbench single-core, 18.9% in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 19.7% in Cinebench R15 single-core, with a 14.7% advantage in Passmark single-thread. For users running applications that rely on high per-core performance—web browsing, office productivity, legacy software, and many games—this translates to a snappier, more responsive experience.

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, despite being a mobile part, wins the multi-threaded Cinebench R23 test by 5.6%, scoring 13,497 against 12,735. It also wins Passmark integer math by 9.9% and floating-point math by 3.7%, plus 3DMark 16-thread and max-thread tests. This makes it the pick for content creation, video encoding, and other workloads that scale with core count—provided the system can sustain the mobile chip’s 45W TDP in a suitable chassis.

There is a notable exception: Geekbench multicore goes decisively to the Ryzen 5 7600 by 36.2%, a contradiction that suggests the mobile chip’s thermal or power constraints hurt it in that specific test. The verdict from the data is that the Ryzen 5 7600 is the safer all-rounder for a desktop, while the Ryzen 9 6900HX is the choice for a mobile system where its 8 cores can stretch their legs. Both are active production parts, but they serve fundamentally different sockets and market segments.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Zen generations and are built on different process nodes. The Ryzen 5 7600 uses Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process with a die size of 71 mm². The Ryzen 9 6900HX uses Zen 3+ with the Rembrandt codename, on TSMC’s 6 nm process with a much larger 208 mm² die. The transistor count is only listed for the Ryzen 5 7600 at 6,570 million; no figure is provided for the mobile chip.

Core and cache configurations differ significantly. The Ryzen 5 7600 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 6900HX has 8 cores and 16 threads. L1 cache is identical at 64 KB per core, but L2 differs: 1 MB per core on the desktop part versus 512 KB per core on the mobile part. L3 cache is also asymmetric, with 32 MB shared on the Ryzen 5 7600 and only 16 MB shared on the Ryzen 9 6900HX. The desktop chip’s larger L2 and L3 caches likely contribute to its single-threaded advantage.

Memory and I/O features also diverge. Both support DDR5 and dual-channel memory, but the Ryzen 5 7600 has a higher listed memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the mobile chip. ECC memory is supported on the Ryzen 5 7600 but not on the Ryzen 9 6900HX. PCIe generation differs: the desktop part offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the mobile part offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics also differ, with the Ryzen 5 7600 carrying Radeon Graphics and the Ryzen 9 6900HX carrying the Radeon 680M.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7600 wins in nearly every single-threaded and latency-sensitive metric. The data shows wins in 3DMark single-thread (999 vs 912, +9.5%), Cinebench R15 single-core (298 vs 249, +19.7%), Cinebench R23 single-core (1852 vs 1558, +18.9%), Geekbench single-core (2521 vs 1881, +34%), Passmark single-thread (3910 vs 3409, +14.7%), Passmark physics (1776 vs 1153, +54%), and Passmark find prime numbers (200 vs 63, +217.5%). The 3DMark 2-thread and 4-thread wins (+9.7% and +9.9%, respectively) further confirm that the desktop chip excels when thread counts are low.

The Ryzen 9 6900HX wins where core count matters. It takes 3DMark 16-thread (6745 vs 6499, +3.6%), 3DMark 8-thread (5607 vs 5508, +1.8%), 3DMark max-thread (6717 vs 6503, +3.2%), Cinebench R23 multicore (13497 vs 12735, +5.6%), Passmark data compression (306184 vs 304942, +0.4%), Passmark data encryption (19118 vs 17704, +7.4%), Passmark floating-point math (49981 vs 48107, +3.7%), and Passmark integer math (89388 vs 80581, +9.9%). The mobile chip’s two extra cores and four extra threads provide a measurable edge in these parallel workloads.

There is a notable split in Cinebench: the Ryzen 5 7600 wins R15 multicore by 4.8%, but the Ryzen 9 6900HX wins R23 multicore by 5.6%. This suggests the mobile chip scales better with longer, more demanding multi-threaded loads, while the desktop chip handles shorter bursts more efficiently. Geekbench multicore breaks the pattern entirely, going to the Ryzen 5 7600 by 36.2%, indicating that the mobile chip’s performance is highly sensitive to the specific test conditions.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher single-threaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 wins every single-threaded benchmark in the data. It leads by 34% in Geekbench single-core (2521 vs 1881), 19.7% in Cinebench R15 single-core (298 vs 249), 18.9% in Cinebench R23 single-core (1852 vs 1558), and 14.7% in Passmark single-thread (3910 vs 3409).

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 6900HX have more cores?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 6900HX has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600 has 6 cores and 12 threads. This gives the mobile chip an advantage in multi-threaded benchmarks like Cinebench R23 multicore, where it scores 13,497 versus 12,735.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX has only 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The desktop chip also has 1 MB of L2 per core versus 512 KB per core on the mobile chip.

Q: Are both processors on the same process node?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 7600 is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, while the Ryzen 9 6900HX uses TSMC’s 6 nm process. The die size also differs significantly, at 71 mm² for the desktop chip and 208 mm² for the mobile chip.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has a listed memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the Ryzen 9 6900HX has 76.8 GB/s. Both support DDR5 memory and dual-channel configuration, but the desktop chip has a higher bandwidth figure.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX does not. This makes the desktop chip more suitable for workstations or systems requiring error-correcting memory.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The biggest win for the Ryzen 5 7600 comes in Passmark find prime numbers, where it scores 200 against the Ryzen 9 6900HX’s 63, a 217.5% advantage. This test is highly sensitive to single-thread integer performance and cache latency, illustrating the desktop chip’s architectural efficiency. The next largest margin is in Geekbench multicore, where the Ryzen 5 7600 wins by 36.2% (13,413 vs 9,850), a surprising result given the mobile chip’s core advantage. Geekbench single-core also favors the desktop chip by 34% (2,521 vs 1,881).

Passmark physics shows a 54% win for the Ryzen 5 7600 (1,776 vs 1,153), and Cinebench R15 single-core gives it a 19.7% lead (298 vs 249). Cinebench R23 single-core follows at 18.9% (1,852 vs 1,558), and Passmark single-thread at 14.7% (3,910 vs 3,409). Passmark random string sorting goes to the desktop chip by 12.1% (35,904 vs 32,037), and Passmark multithread by 11.1% (27,058 vs 24,346). Passmark extended instructions show a 10.7% win (23,071 vs 20,849), while 3DMark 4-thread and 2-thread go to the Ryzen 5 7600 by 9.9% and 9.7%, respectively.

The Ryzen 9 6900HX counters with its own set of wins. Its largest margin is in Passmark integer math, where it scores 89,388 against 80,581, a 9.9% advantage. Passmark data encryption goes to the mobile chip by 7.4% (19,118 vs 17,704), and Cinebench R23 multicore by 5.6% (13,497 vs 12,735). Passmark floating-point math is a 3.7% win (49,981 vs 48,107), and 3DMark 16-thread a 3.6% win (6,745 vs 6,499). 3DMark max-thread shows a 3.2% advantage (6,717 vs 6,503), and 3DMark 8-thread a 1.8% win (5,607 vs 5,508). Passmark data compression is nearly a tie, with the mobile chip winning by 0.4% (306,184 vs 304,942). Cinebench R15 multicore is the only multi-threaded test won by the desktop chip, at 4.8% (2,339 vs 2,231).

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in almost every major specification field. The Ryzen 5 7600 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 6900HX has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 3.80 GHz for the desktop chip and 3.30 GHz for the mobile chip, with boost clocks of 5.10 GHz and 4.90 GHz, respectively. TDP differs substantially: 65W for the Ryzen 5 7600 versus 45W for the Ryzen 9 6900HX.

The socket, architecture, and process node all differ. The Ryzen 5 7600 uses AMD Socket AM5 with Zen 4 architecture (Raphael), while the Ryzen 9 6900HX uses AMD Socket FP7 with Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt). The desktop chip is on 5 nm, the mobile chip on 6 nm. Transistor count is listed only for the Ryzen 5 7600 at 6,570 million, and die size is 71 mm² for the desktop part versus 208 mm² for the mobile part.

Cache configuration is asymmetric: L1 is 64 KB per core for both, but L2 is 1 MB per core on the Ryzen 5 7600 versus 512 KB per core on the Ryzen 9 6900HX, and L3 is 32 MB shared versus 16 MB shared. Memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, and ECC support is present only on the desktop chip. PCIe lanes are Gen 5 with 24 lanes on the Ryzen 5 7600 versus Gen 4 with 20 lanes on the Ryzen 9 6900HX. Integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics on the desktop part and Radeon 680M on the mobile part. The market segment is Desktop for the Ryzen 5 7600 and Mobile for the Ryzen 9 6900HX. The Ryzen 5 7600 has a launch MSRP of $229, while no launch MSRP is listed for the Ryzen 9 6900HX. Both have unlocked multipliers, but the Ryzen 5 7600 has a release date of 2023-01-13, while the Ryzen 9 6900HX has none listed.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 7600
9 6900HX
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.8
3.3 -13.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Frequency (GHz)
3.8
3.3 -13.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Multiplier
38
33 -13.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
32 MB (shared)
16 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
45 -30.8%
PPT
88 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 3+
Codename
Raphael
Rembrandt
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Raphael))
Ryzen 9 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))
Process Size
5 nm
6 nm
Transistors
6,570 million
—
Die Size
71 mm²
208 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
AMD Socket FP7
Chipsets
X670E, X670, B650E, B650
—
PCIe
Gen 5, 24 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Radeon 680M
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$229
—
Part Number
100-000001015
100-000000544100-000000560
Package
FC-LGA1718
FP7, FP7r2
Tj Max
95°C
95°C
View Ryzen 5 7600 Details View Ryzen 9 6900HX Details