AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 226V Comparison

The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V and AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS are both mobile processors aimed at different corners of the laptop market, and their benchmark data reveals a sharp split in personality. The Intel part, built on Lunar Lake, leans heavily on its modern architecture for single-threaded dominance and efficiency, while the AMD chip, a Zen 3+ design from the Rembrandt-R family, counters with its higher thread count and raw compute throughput in specific workloads. The data shows a clear division: Intel wins by a wide margin in most core-performance tests, but AMD takes the crown in several specialized, multi-threaded tasks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V establishes an early and decisive lead in the Cinebench suite. In the single-core tests, the gap is substantial: the Ultra 5 scores 267 in Cinebench R15 single-core versus 232 for the Ryzen 5 7535HS, a 15.1% advantage. That lead widens further in Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel’s 1744 points beat AMD’s 1445 by a massive 20.7%. This pattern is consistent with the Geekbench results, where Intel wins single-core by 16.7% (1930 vs 1654) and multi-core by 16.9% (8598 vs 7354). The Intel chip’s superiority in raw single-thread performance is its most definitive advantage, and it carries over into the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, where Intel’s 9848 score tops AMD’s 8613 by 14.3%.

The Intel part also dominates in several PassMark sub-tests that reward per-core efficiency and modern instruction handling. In PassMark find prime numbers, the Ultra 5 scores 166 versus a mere 49 for the Ryzen, an eye-watering 238.8% delta. Similarly, PassMark physics shows Intel at 1449 versus 844, a 71.7% lead, and PassMark floating point math goes to Intel by 47.1% (52270 vs 35540). The single-thread PassMark test also reflects this, with Intel at 3754 versus 3123, a 20.2% victory.

However, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS does not go down without a fight, and it wins the other major discipline: integer-heavy and data-streaming workloads. The most striking win is in PassMark data compression, where AMD scores 221668 against Intel’s 170687, a 23% advantage. AMD also wins PassMark integer math decisively, posting 62372 versus Intel’s 38647, a 38% lead. In PassMark data encryption, AMD’s 13656 edges out Intel’s 12710 by 6.9%. The AMD chip also takes smaller victories in PassMark extended instructions (15411 vs 14724, a 4.5% lead) and PassMark random string sorting (22781 vs 20813, an 8.6% lead). The overall multithread score is nearly a tie, with AMD at 17914 and Intel at 17850, a negligible 0.4% difference.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark split paints a clear picture of ideal use cases. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V is the choice for latency-sensitive and lightly-threaded applications. Its 20.7% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core makes it the better engine for everyday responsiveness, office productivity, and software that relies on a single fast core. The massive 238.8% margin in prime number finding suggests superior branch prediction and integer execution per clock, which benefits scientific and financial simulation tasks. The 71.7% win in physics simulation and 47.1% lead in floating-point math indicate it is also better suited for 3D rendering physics calculations and scientific computing that uses floating-point operations.

Conversely, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is the stronger option for workloads that scale with threads and benefit from its 12-thread count. Its 23% advantage in data compression shows it can handle archive extraction and database compression tasks with more throughput. The 38% lead in integer math makes it better for general-purpose coding, cryptography, and financial modeling that is integer-based. The wins in data encryption and extended instructions suggest it is also more capable in security-related tasks and software that leverages new CPU instruction sets. The near-tie in the overall multithread score (17914 vs 17850) indicates that for heavily parallel, mixed workloads, the two are functionally equivalent, despite their architectural differences.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs and process nodes. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS uses a larger 6 nm process, also from TSMC. This process advantage allows Intel to pack its 8 cores and 8 threads into a 17 W TDP, whereas the AMD chip, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is rated for a 35 W TDP. Intel’s design uses a "Lunar Lake" architecture, while AMD relies on the older "Zen 3+" architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. The die size difference is notable, with AMD’s chip measuring 208 mm², though Intel’s die size is not listed.

Cache configurations also differ significantly. Intel allocates 192 KB of L1 cache per core and a robust 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 8 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD, in contrast, uses a leaner 64 KB L1 per core and 512 KB L2 per core, but compensates with a much larger 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache on the AMD side likely contributes to its strong performance in data compression and integer tasks, where large working sets can be cached locally. Intel’s higher per-core L1 and L2 caches, combined with its 3 nm process, are key to its single-core dominance.

Memory support is another differentiator. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a listed bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part’s memory support is listed as "unknown" and depends on the motherboard, though it also uses a dual-channel bus. The integrated graphics differ as well: Intel packs an Arc 130V, while AMD uses a Radeon 660M. The PCIe capabilities are distinct, with Intel offering Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only), while AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which could affect expandability for discrete GPUs and storage.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V wins all single-core benchmarks. It leads by 15.1% in Cinebench R15 single-core, 20.7% in Cinebench R23 single-core, 16.7% in Geekbench single-core, and 20.2% in PassMark single-thread.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS outperform Intel in any multi-threaded test?

A: Yes, the AMD chip wins in several specialized tests. It beats Intel by 23% in PassMark data compression, by 38% in integer math, and by 6.9% in data encryption. The overall PassMark multithread score is nearly identical, with AMD at 17914 and Intel at 17850.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V has 8 cores and 8 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite having fewer physical cores, the AMD chip’s simultaneous multithreading gives it more threads.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The Intel processor has a TDP of 17 W, making it a low-power part, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has a TDP of 35 W, indicating a higher power draw for sustained performance.

Q: Which processor has more cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has a larger shared L3 cache of 16 MB, compared to Intel’s 8 MB. However, Intel has larger per-core L1 (192 KB) and L2 (2.5 MB) caches versus AMD’s 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2.

Q: What are the manufacturing process nodes?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V is built on a 3 nm process, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS uses a 6 nm process. Both are manufactured by TSMC.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core Ultra 5 226V | AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.55 GHz |

| TDP | 17 W | 35 W |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Socket | Intel BGA 2833 | AMD Socket FP7 |

| Architecture | Lunar Lake | Zen 3+ |

| Codename | Lunar Lake | Rembrandt-R |

| L1 Cache | 192 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | Unknown (depends on motherboard) | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Arc 130V | Radeon 660M |

| Die Size | Not listed | 208 mm² |

| Release Date | 2024-09-23 | 2023-01-03 |