AMD Ryzen 5 7530U vs Intel Core i9-11900H Comparison

The benchmark data is unequivocal: the Intel Core i9-11900H outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U in every single head-to-head test recorded. With 15 wins for Intel and zero for AMD, the comparison is less about competition and more about measuring the scale of Intel’s advantage in this particular matchup. The largest gap appears in multi-core workloads, where the Intel chip’s extra cores and higher power envelope deliver a dominant lead, while single-threaded performance remains a closer contest.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel Core i9-11900H scores 16,772 against the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U’s 8,361. That is a 100.6% difference, meaning Intel delivers more than double the multi-threaded rendering performance. This is the single biggest win in the entire dataset. The gap narrows but remains substantial in Cinebench R15 multi-core, with Intel leading 1,690 to 1,415, a 19.4% advantage. Clearly, when all cores are engaged, the Intel part’s 8-core/16-thread configuration crushes the AMD’s 6-core/12-thread setup.

Single-core results tell a different story, but Intel still wins. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 2,367 versus AMD’s 1,441, a 64.3% lead. The older Cinebench R15 single-core test shows a much tighter race: Intel at 238 and AMD at 231, a mere 3% difference. PassMark single-thread tests also show a narrow margin, with Intel at 3,102 and AMD at 3,049, just 1.7% ahead. This suggests that in lightly-threaded tasks, the AMD chip is competitive, but the Intel silicon still holds the edge.

Across the PassMark suite, Intel’s wins are consistent and often large. In integer math, Intel scores 72,882 against AMD’s 57,609, a 26.5% lead. Floating-point math shows Intel ahead at 43,094 versus 31,063, a 38.7% margin. Data compression favors Intel heavily: 239,366 versus 185,860, a 28.8% difference. Extended instructions show Intel at 16,123 versus AMD’s 12,264, a 31.5% gain. The largest percentage win outside of Cinebench R23 is in prime number finding, where Intel scores 87 versus AMD’s 47, an 85.1% advantage. Even in data encryption, where the gap is smallest in absolute terms, Intel leads 12,232 to 11,826, a 3.4% edge.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i9-11900H is built on Intel’s Tiger Lake architecture, specifically the Tiger Lake-H variant, using a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The chip has a 35W TDP, indicating a higher power draw for sustained performance. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The die size is 190 mm².

The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U is based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Barcelo-R, and uses a 7 nm process from TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2,000 MHz (2.00 GHz) and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Its TDP is much lower at 15W, marking it as an ultra-low-power part for thin-and-light laptops. The cache is smaller: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The die size is 180 mm², and AMD lists 10,700 million transistors.

Memory support is identical on paper: both use DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. However, the PCIe implementation differs significantly. Intel offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while AMD provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives Intel a potential advantage in bandwidth for discrete GPUs and high-speed storage. Integrated graphics also differ: Intel uses UHD Graphics 750, while AMD pairs with Radeon Graphics (Vega 6). The Intel chip supports ECC memory? No — the data shows Intel has ECC memory as false, while AMD lists ECC memory as true.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the Intel Core i9-11900H wins every measured category, making it the clear choice for performance-oriented users. Its biggest wins are in multi-threaded workloads: Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it doubles the AMD score, and passmark_multithread, where it scores 20,162 versus 15,534, a 29.8% lead. This makes it superior for video rendering, 3D modeling, compilation, and any task that scales across cores. The Intel chip also dominates in physics simulations (PassMark physics: 953 versus 670, a 42.2% lead) and random string sorting (28,328 versus 19,477, a 45.4% gain), indicating strong memory and cache performance under load.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U does not win a single benchmark, but its results show where it is least disadvantaged. Single-threaded performance is its strongest area relative to Intel: PassMark single-thread shows only a 1.7% gap, and Cinebench R15 single-core shows a 3% gap. This means for everyday tasks that rely on one or two cores — web browsing, office applications, light coding — the AMD chip is nearly as fast. Its lower TDP of 15W also suggests it would generate less heat and potentially offer longer battery life, though the data does not include battery tests.

Specification Differences

The core specification differences are stark. Intel has 8 cores and 16 threads, while AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel’s base clock is 2.10 GHz versus AMD’s 2,000 MHz, and Intel’s boost clock is 4.90 GHz versus AMD’s 4.50 GHz. Intel’s TDP is 35W, more than double AMD’s 15W. The process node favors AMD: 7 nm (TSMC) versus Intel’s 10 nm. Cache sizes differ: Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3; AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Intel’s die size is 190 mm², slightly larger than AMD’s 180 mm². Intel supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while AMD supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. AMD supports ECC memory; Intel does not. Intel’s integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 750; AMD’s are Radeon Graphics (Vega 6). Intel’s production status is end-of-life, while AMD is active. Intel was released on 2021-05-10, and AMD on 2023-01-03. Intel has a launch MSRP of $546; AMD’s launch MSRP is not listed.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i9-11900H is significantly faster. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 16,772 versus AMD’s 8,361, a 100.6% advantage. In PassMark multithread, Intel scores 20,162 versus 15,534, a 29.8% lead.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U competitive in single-threaded tasks?

A: It is close but still loses. In PassMark single-thread, AMD scores 3,049 against Intel’s 3,102, a 1.7% gap. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the difference is 231 versus 238, a 3% margin.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The Intel Core i9-11900H has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U uses a 7 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i9-11900H uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Do these CPUs support the same memory type?

A: Both support DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. However, the AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i9-11900H has a TDP of 35W. The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U has a TDP of 15W.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: choose the Intel Core i9-11900H if raw performance is the priority. It wins every benchmark in the dataset, often by wide margins. Its 8-core/16-thread configuration, higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and larger 24 MB L3 cache provide a decisive edge in multi-threaded applications like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 100.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is not a marginal gain; it is a generational leap within this comparison. The Intel chip also offers PCIe Gen 4 support and a higher 35W TDP, which typically allows for sustained performance under load.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U is not a bad processor, but in this matchup, it simply cannot match Intel’s performance. Its 6-core/12-thread design and lower 15W TDP make it suitable for power-efficient laptops where battery life is more important than peak performance. Its single-threaded scores are within 1.7% of Intel’s in PassMark, so for everyday computing it will feel responsive. It also supports ECC memory, which Intel lacks, and uses a smaller 7 nm process. However, the benchmark results show Intel wins in every single test, from data compression to floating-point math. If the question is which CPU is faster, the answer is always Intel. If the question is which is more efficient, the data suggests AMD, but in this head-to-head, efficiency does not translate into a single benchmark win.